Moved to @ube@tsundere.love
ube@spergia.net
5
0
1
Moved to @ube@tsundere.love
ube@spergia.net
1
0
0
SuperDicq
SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo@ube You are wrong. The license says nothing about the software’s quality.
2
0
1
Moved to @ube@tsundere.love
ube@spergia.net
3
0
0
SuperDicq
SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo@ube I mean the only reason they might do that is because they have more money that is unethically gained by exploiting their users.
1
0
3
Moved to @ube@tsundere.love
ube@spergia.net
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
Moved to @ube@tsundere.love
ube@spergia.net
1
0
0
@SuperDicq @ube @nigger "Responsive" my ass! Retvrn to skeuomorphism with mid-2000's overtones!
1
1
5
@VD15 @ube @nigger You can’t make pixel perfect designs like this anymore because phones and high res desktop monitors fuck everything up with their insane DPI.
Like seriously you make a website and set you border-width: 1px; and the client browser is just like “let me make this 3 pixels wide or someshit because I’m a phone” and I as the developer am like I SPECIFICALLY SAID MAKE IT 1 PIXEL. WHY IS 1 PIXEL NOT 1 PIXEL.
2
0
2
@SuperDicq @ube @nigger Sanest non-trivial web browser quirk tbh
0
0
0
@hj @nigger @SuperDicq @ube "device pixel" implies the existence of some kind of abstract, deviceless pixel
2
0
1
1
0
2
@VD15 @hj @nigger @ube I am also of the opinion that 1920x1200 is literally the perfect resolution for desktop pc usage.
Anything higher and you will start to get into high DPI bullshittery and everything starts looking terrible and half the applications don’t scale correctly and fonts become all blurry.
3
0
3
@hj @nigger @SuperDicq @ube Same, I run 2560*1440, but I don't scale shit. I like everything slightly smaller so I have more screen real-estate.
1
0
0
2
0
0
@SuperDicq @hj @ube @nigger God knows how you fuck up scaling a vector font, but they manage it
1
0
1
1
0
0
2
0
1
Gay, loud and annoying ! 
hj@shigusegubu.club
3
4
5
0
0
0
1
0
1
RedTechEngineer
RedTechEngineer@fedi.lowpassfilter.link
0
0
0
Listens to Baroque while coding murder.exe 
newt@stereophonic.space
0
0
0
Listens to Baroque while coding murder.exe
newt@stereophonic.space
>But 2560x1440 is only slightly more pixels than 1920x1200.
60%.
(2560*1440) / (1920*1200) = 1.6
1
0
0
1
0
0
Listens to Baroque while coding murder.exe
newt@stereophonic.space
>needing to set desktop scaling to "200%" to be able to see anything like on 4K.
why would you?
2
0
0
1
0
0
Listens to Baroque while coding murder.exe
newt@stereophonic.space
Basically, 200-250dpi is perfect for computer screens.
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
Listens to Baroque while coding murder.exe
newt@stereophonic.space
0
0
3
Even going based off shallow functional matters, most proprietary software is complete and utter garbage - the users just suck it up and always accept that they can't do certain things.
Free software early in development is usually functionally poor (the same is true of proprietary programs that become functionally good), but if a lot of work is put into a free program, often it turns out great, with no parallel when to comes to proprietary software.
Most complaints I see when it comes to free software is massive skill issues and the main issue is that the proprietary slave has shit and mediocre skills.
0
0
0
If it's GPLv3-or-later or AGPLv3-or-later or GPLv2-or-later and the project says it's free software and stands for the users freedom, it's great.
If it's GPLv2-only, usually the software has some defects, but is pretty decent.
If it's under a weak license, the software is generally poor.
If it's under a proprietary license, it's usually dogshit (there's only a handful of proprietary temptation that's actually functionally good really).
0
0
0
Meanwhile, GNU gives the great user experience of GNU/Freedom.
0
0
0
1
0
1
RedTechEngineer
RedTechEngineer@fedi.lowpassfilter.linkSome laptops like MacBooks have them. The BenQ RD240Q is one standalone.
But why settle for 8:5 when 3:2 perfection is in reach?
0
0
0