Conversation
「CM VRISKA」
vriska@lizards.live
You are clinically retarded if you think 1938 Europe wins btw and I do not respect you
5
0
2
@vriska Algeria alone could solo 1939 Europe lmao. They don't have radars!
1
0
0
1
0
1
Saiba Paladin Katze Kattepus 
nerthos@shitposter.world
@vriska 1939 Europe has a chance if it starts slow enough that they can capture tech and start replicating it, loses if it's a "deploy all manpower for ground invasion, the war must be done by christmas" scenario
2
0
0
mothball蛾玉 (*Latest Fad)
moth_ball@shitposter.world
@vriska why do you care what a bunch of bots think about a nonsensical scenario
0
0
0
0
0
1
「CM VRISKA」
vriska@lizards.live@nerthos I could solo half of 1939 Europe if I turned my acty into a techy
1
0
0
Saiba Paladin Katze Kattepus
nerthos@shitposter.world
0
0
0
Saiba Paladin Katze Kattepus
nerthos@shitposter.world
@vriska These have been basically the same since the 20s
The tech gap isn't so massive that a bunch of engineers couldn't get to 70% of it within a year with captured gear, at least for infantry gear, and then it's about willingness for endless guerrilla war.
The tech gap isn't so massive that a bunch of engineers couldn't get to 70% of it within a year with captured gear, at least for infantry gear, and then it's about willingness for endless guerrilla war.
1
0
0
1
0
0
@coolbean @vriska @snacks WW2 was an existential war for everyone involved, there was no way in which it wasn't over quickly. Meanwhile the war in Ukraine is largely a war of attrition (that Russia isn't even treating as a war with full mobilization, "special military operation" is legal shenanigans more than anything.)
1
0
0
Chaotic Good-ish Barbarian
Deplorable_Degenerate@eveningzoo.club
There's a lot of things to unpack from this, but replicating technology isn't one of them. Reverse engineering stuff would take them years.
The big thing is if there is no outside help or supplies Europe's industry can rapidly replace their loses and Africa's can't. Countries like Egypt will be a tall order but in a prolonged battle of attrition they'll eventually run out of missiles to shoot down planes with. If South Africa still had nukes I'd say Africa but they gave them to the Israelis so Europe wins after catostrophic loses.
The big thing is if there is no outside help or supplies Europe's industry can rapidly replace their loses and Africa's can't. Countries like Egypt will be a tall order but in a prolonged battle of attrition they'll eventually run out of missiles to shoot down planes with. If South Africa still had nukes I'd say Africa but they gave them to the Israelis so Europe wins after catostrophic loses.
2
0
1
Saiba Paladin Katze Kattepus
nerthos@shitposter.world
@Deplorable_Degenerate @vriska Neither of them can realistically invade and mantain full control of the other in that scenario so give or take a few years/decade it has to settle with "we're both too spent let's go back to mostly old borders"
2
0
0
Saiba Paladin Katze Kattepus
nerthos@shitposter.world
@Deplorable_Degenerate @vriska Also the level at which "replicating technology" is doable is semi-auto infantry weapons, rocketry, jet engines. No computers, maybe radar after a bit. Enough for unending guerrilla.
0
0
0
Chaotic Good-ish Barbarian
Deplorable_Degenerate@eveningzoo.club
Not unplausible, and in the opening moves Africa is bombing the shit out of them and hurting their industry.
But I think if the British, French, and Italians can keep their fleets in tact an invasion could be in the cards later. Big if tho
But I think if the British, French, and Italians can keep their fleets in tact an invasion could be in the cards later. Big if tho
0
0
1
touch fluffy tail (Heroic) 
fluffy@fsebugoutzone.org
@nerthos @Deplorable_Degenerate @vriska
the situation among african states is very lop-sided.
if egypt could be excluded from the african coalition, the situation would change drastically.
image.png
the situation among african states is very lop-sided.
if egypt could be excluded from the african coalition, the situation would change drastically.
image.png
1
0
1
Saiba Paladin Katze Kattepus
nerthos@shitposter.world
@fluffy @Deplorable_Degenerate @vriska Still Algeria with those Su-30s could just shoot down anything that could fly in 1939 without being touched once. It really comes down to giving up on air superiority and fucking with their logistics as much as possible.
1
0
0
touch fluffy tail (Heroic)
fluffy@fsebugoutzone.org
@nerthos @Deplorable_Degenerate @vriska
You're going to shoot down 119,871 WW2 aircraft with 72 of these?
image.png
You're going to shoot down 119,871 WW2 aircraft with 72 of these?
image.png
1
0
0
Saiba Paladin Katze Kattepus
nerthos@shitposter.world
@fluffy @Deplorable_Degenerate @vriska Yeah. Provided there's enough fuel and ammo it's doable, no air defense of the 30s can hit a supersonic jet.
1
0
0
Saiba Paladin Katze Kattepus
nerthos@shitposter.world
@fluffy Strike from north africa, erase opposing air force while taking territory, establish forward airbases. It has a 3000km range so a consistent push is doable. The role of air power is to secure the advance of ground troops anyway.
0
0
0