Conversation

@redmp

What happened to the normal human:

{aᵢ | i ∈ [1,n] }

?

1
0
0
@lucy @redmp i fucking hate programmers so much
1
0
0
@lucy @redmp if i see this shit again i will only use shit like apl
1
0
0
@naaksit @redmp 😭why it's a simple explanation i wish i had in school when i learned that stuff.. the code is much more intuitive than "sum of 3n from n=0 to 4"
0
0
2

@futurebird @josh0 @Red_Shirt_no2 @elithebearded @redmp

at the risk of killing the frog, i used to know math like this and i forgot

care to explain?

2
0
0

@futurebird @josh0 @Red_Shirt_no2 @elithebearded @redmp

{ 𝑚∈𝕄 ; 𝑙𝑎𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑎𝑛(𝑚)>0 }

1
0
0

@futurebird @josh0 @Red_Shirt_no2 @elithebearded @redmp
I feel like induction is the way to go here, but I can't be bothered to rig it up visually right now.

1
0
0

@futurebird @josh0 @Red_Shirt_no2 @elithebearded @redmp
There's also probably a real good way to do it with sets, but that's outside my area of expertise.

1
0
0

@futurebird @josh0 @Red_Shirt_no2 @elithebearded @redmp

Here's my very professional Graph Theory version because graphic design is my passion.

0
0
1

@jrm4 @futurebird @josh0 @Red_Shirt_no2 @elithebearded @redmp I think(?) something is snarled up, but i=0 to infinite is an infinite series.

0
0
0

@jrm4 @josh0 @Red_Shirt_no2 @elithebearded @redmp

It's a riff on operators like the summation symbol and the infinite product symbol.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summation

Mine makes no sense don't overthink it.

1
0
0