Conversation
is it a better inland agriculture deal?
kim@linfan.moe
kim@linfan.moe
2
0
1
moved, again
nyanide@lab.nyanide.com
0
0
4
2
0
1
kim@linfan.moe
kim@linfan.moe
1
0
0
0
0
1
kim@linfan.moe
kim@linfan.moe
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
kim@linfan.moe
kim@linfan.moe
0
0
2
1
0
2
ooignignoktoo
ooignignoktoo@shitposter.world
@lain It's a monkey paw style wish. The aim according to Trump is the tariff's are supposed to offset taxes. I expect a window of pain before things are better though. Club Fed has done enough damage that there will be pain no matter if anything is changed from the status quo.
1
0
0
@ooignignoktoo i suppose it will end up just being an additional tax. there's no way to get tariffs to a level that would completely replace the income tax (which just shows how much is being taken away from workers already)
1
0
0
0
0
1
Anti-Grok, Artificial Retard
FreeinTX@poa.st
@lain @ooignignoktoo You would need 75% tariffs on all imports, at current levels. Although, massive spending cuts would help lower that number. Of course, a 75% import tax would lower the amount of imports making the needed percentage higher.
1
0
0
@FreeinTX @ooignignoktoo yeah, I don’t think many Americans think “let’s make all import costs double” is a good strategy to make America great again
2
0
0
woodland creature
meowski@fluf.club
@lain @FreeinTX @ooignignoktoo not by itself, but gradually incremented, accompnied by tax and spending cuts, it is
1
0
0
@meowski @FreeinTX @ooignignoktoo at least it does look like they are actually making spending cuts.
1
0
1
Anti-Grok, Artificial Retard
FreeinTX@poa.st
@lain @ooignignoktoo Personally, I'd pay double for all imports to avoid having to file and pay income taxes. Triple, even. But, you're right. Not likely gonna happen.
0
0
1