Conversation

https://www.idrlabs.com/dark-core-faces/test.php

decades of survival training have finally paid off
i can detect male assholes on sight

4
0
3

@mia this test seemed like a load of bullshit because they all have neutral expressions. i think their actions are more important than profiling someones face

2
0
2
@Mondobizarrro @mia this kind of crap is a good example of using biased data to build a model and then turning around and using that model to somehow prove that that bias is innate, very similar to the "gender detection" apps. that being said, i'm posting my results because i think they're funny.
3
0
4

@rowb1t @Mondobizarrro i mean, yeah. that’s of course true.

if anything, i think the apparent correllation between physiognomy and personality traits can be traced back to things like family backgrounds and socioeconomic hardship in the sample of people who participated in that study, which certain groups of the population are more affected by than others

0
0
2
@rowb1t @Mondobizarrro @mia maybe i'm just having a certified autism moment but i also felt like every pair of faces was just one that was slightly more conventionally attractive than the other, i couldn't tell what else was different about them
4
0
3
@swampwitch @Mondobizarrro @mia that's literally it. people are conditioned to have an absolutely massive bias toward conventionally attractive people, to the point that when asked they will usually assume attractive people are more friendly, successful, intelligent, even less likely to have committed a crime.

there was an absolutely batshit theory i read a long time ago (i don't remember who originated) that tries to explain this away by saying that intelligent and kind men were historically able to mate with the most attractive women, resulting in a correlation between intelligence, kindness, and attractiveness -- rather than recognizing the very simple reality that people are just biased toward hot people. xf_creatura
3
0
2
@rowb1t @Mondobizarrro @mia i did exactly as well as a monkey on a typewriter smh
0
0
2

@elementals @swampwitch @rowb1t @Mondobizarrro all that being said gaydar is still a real thing

as well as the trauma radar. i’ve spotted other trans people (closeted or passing) because they all tend to have a distinct habitus and body language. if not on sight, it’s obvious once you talk about how you relate to the world you’ve grown up in, and the regrets you may have. i don’t think most people would notice these traits, but, as they say, real recognize real

1
0
1
@mia I can barely differentiate the faces blobcatautism
0
0
0

@rowb1t @swampwitch @Mondobizarrro kinda funny because the more conventionally attractive males in this test tend to be psychos

4
0
2
@rowb1t @Mondobizarrro @mia yeah i was pretty sure i'd heard about that, and knowing about it kept tripping me up like, "does this quiz think hot people or normal people are the good ones?"
0
0
2

@rowb1t @swampwitch @mia yeah it just looked like one was more conventionally attractive than the other

0
0
0

@rowb1t @swampwitch @Mondobizarrro (i’m willing to believe there’s a kernel of truth in that, given how climbing the ladder of success in this society requires dark traits especially of the male population)

1
0
1

@mia @rowb1t @swampwitch @elementals i always noticed this with other autistic people

0
0
1

@mia @rowb1t @swampwitch it requires dark traits because the system screws over others. the only way to get anywhere is to sell out. nice people wish to see it replaced by one that rewards kindness

0
0
1
@Mondobizarrro @mia @rowb1t @swampwitch why even do all that this is just pop psyhcology you all know it's going to be ass already
1
0
2

@kittenlikeasmallcat @mia dawg, these NTs are hella cooked. they cant go 5 seconds w/o reinventing phrenology

1
0
1

@Mondobizarrro @mia bb wake up new phrenology dropped they added "read my paid blog about how everyone I don't like is a Narcissist and I am inherently a victim because I am morally superior."

0
0
4
@mia @rowb1t @Mondobizarrro @swampwitch
>abusechads get preferentially selected
/r9k/ was so right femalejoker
0
0
0

@swampwitch @rowb1t @Mondobizarrro @mia a lot of them kinda just looked like slightly different photo angles or w/ different lighting to me.

also this "study" that made this thing sucks (obviously).

I obtained self-reports and peer reports of personality as well as expression-neutral photographs of targets, and then I created prototypes of people high and low on each of the three dimensions by digitally combining select photographs of Caucasian targets. The results indicated that unacquainted observers reliably detected the dark triad composite, especially in female prototypes. Thus, not only is the dark triad a set of psycho-social characteristics—it may also be a set of physical–morphological characteristics.

maybe it means more like whoever they showed this to had a slightly in-common bias about what others look like? and that a few of whoever's in the images, and their peers, might have saw themselves slightly the same way a bit? wow, how surprising. also this

1
1
2