@coolbean english spelling reform is impossible for infinity reasons, logographies are objectively the worst writing system, and both of these things are more true in the age of the computer than they have ever been.
plus english spelling really isnt as bad as people think, and most of the time the spelling → sound relationship is predictable. like sure, the -ough words are annoying, but they are the exception. it especially kills me when people are like "erm uhm technically u can spell fish like "ghoti". first of all, word initial gh is always /g/, it is only ever /f/ at the end of words as part of the larger -ough spelling. same sort of complaint with the -ti, except it's even worse because -ti as 'sh' is absolutely predictable.
Third of all, and more to the general point, you cannot touch english vowel spellings. you cannot. there is no way to reform english vowel spelling. consonants you might get away with, but vowels being written the same by everyone is like half of what keeps english from turning into a bunch of semi-mutually intelligible sister languages
also also, changing English spelling would make the KJV and Shakespeare less accessible, and that is the opposite of how things should go. (on the topic of education, i think it is morally indefensible to not teach children shakespeare and that the decline in biblical literacy is a very bad sign for society as a whole ― im not saying this in a religious way, i'm saying this in a "Everything that was written in English for the past 400+ years, and all products of English (and Canadian and American) culture as a whole, assumed that anyone who interacted with them would know the Bible and Shakespeare." way