Conversation
Kinda think Snap may just be a better flatpak in skme respects
2
1
2
@meeper Polished turd is better than unpolished turd! Many such cases!
1
1
1
@Zergling_man Mainly that it can be used for system paxlagw stuff


Flatpak is actually good they just need to make it a little more flexible ig

It's simply a better /opt/ with isolation out of the box

I'd like it to be more behond the scenese and work with the system packagw manager ig
2
0
2
@Zergling_man stroke haver spelling lmao
0
0
2
@meeper So, flatpak and snap are basically solutions to apt being shit. I actually don't begrudge them for not wanting to try to work with apt.
If you are not using apt, you basically don't need either of those.
1
1
1
@Zergling_man not really, maybe snap but idk how it works.

Essentially flapak is a combination of two things a less retarted version of the android style of isolation (necessary to prevent apps you don't trust to sell your ~/Pictures/Camera/feet) Plus a common runtime thay proprietary slop can depend on, so basically allows you to do whatwver the shit in your arch or even alpine and everythinf else just werks.


Problem with flapak is that you kinda have to package everythijg to use this and you can separate the functionality(ig u can rawdog bwrap)
1
0
1
@Zergling_man yeah basically coming from this direction
0
0
1