Conversation
according to google we briefly passed 50% last month. sadly thats probably just due to selection bias/fluctuating samples. still we're getting there i think
given this data it is FUCKING RIDICULOUS that of that 50% of isps, the vast majority dont even have a transition mechanism like 6to4 in place to allow their customers to reach ipv6-only servers (something that would very likely become much more common once such a mechanism is in place). what the fucketh
given this data it is FUCKING RIDICULOUS that of that 50% of isps, the vast majority dont even have a transition mechanism like 6to4 in place to allow their customers to reach ipv6-only servers (something that would very likely become much more common once such a mechanism is in place). what the fucketh
0
0
2
Big Shallot 
tisanae@brain.worm.pink
@coolbean i have no means of contacting them (nor do they, they only know me as $(date -I)@example.com ) 
1
0
3
1
0
2
@coolbean i have a /48 prefix all to my own iirc
1
0
1
@snacks like i have a /64 and i still cant come up with enough subnets to make full use of the 18 QUINTILLION addresses available to me
1
0
1
@coolbean ipv6 addresses are just plentiful and not worth a lot. We're too used to ip addresses being a valuable limited resource for no good reason
1
0
1
@snacks i know i know but a /48 is like... thats a small isp at that point
2
0
0
@snacks you could feasibly host a 6to4 setup for our ipv4bros (though not really cause that ones supposed to be on 2002::)
1
0
1
@coolbean ypu don't want to use my cursed network tho
1
0
1
@snacks 6to4 is the setup for ipv4 clients reaching ipv6 networks. i dont know why either
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0