Conversation
амадалузя
amadaluzia@brain.worm.pink
@fiore can we just replace Akkoma with XMPP and PubSub, XMPP is better social media anyway
2
0
1
@amadaluzia we literally have xmpp
2
0
1
@fiore correct. we could all move to XMPP :3
1
0
2
@amadaluzia @coolbean loves pubsub
1
0
1
@fiore @amadaluzia i do!
though since ive been looking at gnunet the past few days secushare/psyc is also kinda interesting rn
though since ive been looking at gnunet the past few days secushare/psyc is also kinda interesting rn
1
0
0
@dagda @amadaluzia why would you want an xmpp account on worm.pink like genuinely
1
0
0
@dagda you probably want https://queer-spark.org, they have plenty of Slidge bridges and Biboumi
@fiore
@fiore
1
0
1
@fiore @amadaluzia me when i push a gnu to the roof of my mouth (i have to link against part of libtool but libtool doesnt support pkg-config because its libtool and not pkg-config and i have to email the gnunet mailing list asking wtf is up in this regard
1
0
1
chris 
@amadaluzia @fiore a. the one true xmpp client does not exist
b. xml based federation has already been tried and it was apparently even worse than the abysmal state of current activitypub i would not like to see this jab at it
b. xml based federation has already been tried and it was apparently even worse than the abysmal state of current activitypub i would not like to see this jab at it
2
0
1
@chris @amadaluzia @fiore vaguepost king can you tell me more about xml based federation ive never heard of this
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
@amadaluzia @fiore i remember a particular burn i got whilst trying to dm someone in a gc, think i used some sort of 'whisper' feature that most clients didn't support and the 'whisper' was sent to every client in the gc and since the clients didn't actually implement the standard it just.. posted onto the gc like a public message. it was super weird and ass backwards. xmpp gc stuff seems fragile, especially when e2ee is involved
1
0
1
@chris @amadaluzia mucs are good , but omemo2 makes things way nicer
0
0
0