Lilith Ashley Nyx Arson 
root@possum.city
Show content
first of all: it’s fine to not be into something. you don’t have to actively engage with everyone’s kinks. but don’t go around kinkshaming
a lot of people are subscribed to the reactionary idea that there are certain taboo kinks that are inherently bad and/or should be shunned
these are the kinds of ideas that have evolved into the current propagandized stereotype of queer people being sexual predators
the (uncomfortable) truth is that, unless there is actual direct harm caused, there isn’t really any kink that can (or should) be considered “too” kinky
this view is especially prominent when combined with the classic “but think of the kids!” argument - which, as always, often leads to kids being othered from communities that would otherwise claim to be protecting them
this idea also takes many forms (see: proship discourse, incest kinks, babyfur drama, etc) but it’s ultimately all part of the same culture war. it also extends into art, regurgitating the age old “video games cause violence” argument
the cycle of abuse that this causes is quite easy to understand:
- people with taboo kinks are made outcasts
- abusers have a community that accepts them
- victims develop taboo kinks as a trauma response
<small>4. rinse & repeat</small>
the amount of queer people that are actively harming the community by subscribing to these ideas is genuinely baffling. you’d think we’d know better than to use the enemy’s weapon against ourselves
5
0
1
Show content
The enforced normality and puritanical brainrot being evicted would mitigate a lot more, although abusers would still need explicit rejection (so that part doesn't really change in either case).
0
0
0
сплав an alloy
am_odarka@translunar.academyShow content
0
0
0
Master Flesh of House Tzimisce
flesh@gts.fleshcraft.techShow content
@root Could you explain how 1. and 2. connect more exactly?
0
0
0
Chadette Girlgock
based_trannyShow content
The reality is that your 'inclusive' worldview actually hurts the community because it replaces actual standards with a 'everything goes' mentality. When you tell people that nothing is 'too kinky,' you’re basically admitting you have no internal compass. You're just defending a lifestyle where 'gross' is an acceptable substitute for 'meaningful.'
Be honest and Stop pretending your preferences are a sociological breakthrough and just admit that some things are objectively unappealing to the general public.
1
1
1
Show content
0
0
1
Hildegunst von Mythenmetz of programming
condret@shitposter.worldShow content
1
0
0
Chadette Girlgock
based_trannyShow content
the fact that you're spiraling over the word 'objective' instead of addressing the actual point about optics just shows how fragile this take is. It's giving 'i can’t handle any form of judgment so i'll pretend social consensus doesn't exist'.
0
0
1