Looks like he did a 7 hour stream read through of the muslim gang child rape report, not exactly a fan of the roach king but fair play for spreading the good word of Total Pedo Death to his audience.

It's not easy to read through ~300 pages of "... and then the pakis forced a dog to rape me to watch me break" and "... and then the pakis shoved the empty whiskey bottle inside of me and broke it" and "... and then the police took me back to them and said "have fun with her, if you can get her to sign this we won't have to bother you again"" "he put out cigarettes on our baby's head and then he crushed its skull infront of me" from the victim reports.

For comparison of scale of the war crimes, the rape of nanking/nanjing was 20-80k victims of rape over 6 weeks of all ages, not 250k+ children over 70 years. This report doesn't even mention the of age victims as far as I'm aware and it's already ~300 pages.

@Sui
I didn't look into it yet
Is there any clue for their motivation? I assume they would probably get executed in Pakistan

@dagda They're inbred and degenerate 80 IQ max third worlders, the motivation for why it was almost exclusively white working class girls is because non muslim and they're the least cared about demographic. The sikhs fought back, and were allowed to by the government.

If they did it to muslim girls in their home countries, and had enough witnesses for it to be called rape, then yes they'd face death penalties. But so would the victims. Non muslims are not considered human under islam, almost nothing they did went against their religion, it's not even considered adultery to rape non muslims under sharia law.

Also they have very weird and flexible rules about what is and isn't pedophilia, they don't do it by age they do it by a half understanding of puberty. They assume a girl is ready despite often raping them so young that they split both holes into one, it's a common problem in muslim countries. The punishment for that is to house and feed their child wife for their life. Some go for the "if it does no harm", but as Andrew Wilson researched and pointed out in a debate or three, that can only apply if they have microdicks like their prophet who started raping his "favourite wife" at 9 (5 years before her first period according to their religious texts).

@dagda To add onto the effort post, consent is more of a christian idea. For example 'consent' under islam includes children as young as 6 stopping screaming for a minute/making eye contact with a non directly related male, that's enough to consent to both sex and marriage btw. Females will try to calm their 6 year old relatives down so they stop screaming long enough to get married off as common practice.

@Sui
kind of terrifying tbh how apparently socialization plays a big role in the condemnation of pedophilia for men and if it doesn't happen a certain way a lot would just go for it. However sexual ethics is kinda fucked up all over the place in islam, so maybe this isn't the baseline.
I had a good pakistani friend in elementary school, very polite and upright family. Patriarchal of course but their mom made banger food. Religious but not islamic chauvinist and I was around them a lot. It's probably the best for such agreeable pakis if these animals face the most terrifying executions. If Britain wasn't a liberal shithole you could just slowly woodchip all the people involved (including complaint cops) and restore peace easily

>I assume they would probably get executed in Pakistan
This is the thing about their governments over there, they rule with explicit and heavy-handed violence. These people need to be controlled so thoroughly with the threat of violence because this is the means that they regress to every single time they get an inch of freedom; just total reversion to barbarism no matter what. These people (I struggle to call them that) have been unleashed onto the civilized, domesticated and soft Brits (and in general, the Europeans) and together with the enabling police forces are crushing the life out of them. And not before raping them.

@dagda It doesn't help when they're literally retarded and don't understand pretty much anything. I had a few paki friends growing up too, I remember back in primary I defended this one muslim lad from the class bully enough to become the new target lol. I'd deport whatever he's turned into now, unless he went apostate (which I doubt, he wasn't very smart). I no longer believe in the "moderate muslim" myth.

The scale of the problem is too large to fix easily, we've mass imported third worlders for twice as long as I've been alive. It goes all the way from top to bottom. The first step would be to reverse tony blair's removal of the death penalty for treason, and then to send a very clear message for future generations. Vlad/Viking styled would work but I think we could get creative with it.

@Owl @dagda Europe is a continent of anarcho tyranny sectarian demagoguery, easier to cleanse it with nuclear hellfire than fix it.

Complete inversion of any sensible morality system.

"Sure, you can rape and groom and kill, but don't say any mean words about the people doing these things."

@Owl @dagda When you get to the stage of moral relativism that you can sit there and say "Yeah ok getting a dog to rape a child is bad BUT DON'T TALK ABOUT IT BECAUSE THAT'S RACIST AND RACISM IS WORSE!" then we're long past talking about morality.

@Sui @Owl
The problem with multiculturalism is that it assumes that cultures don't try to expand their reach and will just automatically switch to a secularized lite version when they are on western soil (let's be honest, only the west believes in multiculturalism in the first place). For the most time even christianity had an explicit will to power, and now that we have secularized christianity/ culturally christian liberalism the christian churches barely have influence and are spiritually neutered. Now take Islam where there was barely any period where it was cucked by secular state power, except maybe some socialist regimes in Albania and Afghanistan (where it backfired and arguably created Taliban).
Liberalism, with it's elite managerial approach to culture, necessarily creates relativism that leads to not seeing the problems that pop up right before your eyes

@dagda @Owl I'm still a relativist/individualist, but It's hard to disagree that this shit hasn't gone off the deep end. Our superiority was weaponized against us time and time again, egalitarianism became marxism with a few definition changes like equality of opportunity -> equality of outcome and 'racism = prejudice + power'. Most retards just went along with it all like livestock.

I'm not sure there is a way to idiot proof any system tbh, they all have easily exploitable faults inbuilt into them and any future system we create will likely have similar flaws due to flaws in human nature. We're monkeys that pretend to be divine, we're kinda fucked from the start line. A large chunk of us have a need for dogma within the makeup of our brains, and dogma always leads to shutting down your brain and just going along with it like sheep. All it takes is a few dark triad people with enough motivation to raise the ranks to fuck any religion up for centuries or even millenia. And that's just religion, but take the British Empire (The largest empire humanity has ever known, the sun never set on it) which ended in either '47 or '97 and has already descended to letting third worlders rape/torture/kill our children and being too afraid to even speak against it. I think humanity is overdue for an extinction event, we're cooked.

@Sui@decayable.ink @Owl@shitpost.cloud @dagda@netzsphaere.xyz Your daughter is dead, but I am sad which is worse.

maybe I should quickly download that before it gets censored

@monkyyy The report's public, even in the UK, but yeah jewtube's likely to try and shut down this video if it gets enough momentum. It's pretty dark shit dude, and that's coming from someone who grew up on shocksites and 4chan.

@Sui @Owl
>I'm still a relativist/individualist

I didn't propose a value judgement or de-secularization here. I think most of the current hype around christian nationalism and christian or white identitarianism is massive cope. The canon line has been shattered already, and maybe being a secularized cucked religion of victims was christians destiny all along and it was around just long enough to see it.
It's just baffling to see as an ex-catholic satanist how suicidal christianity has become, considering that satanism also draws from the christian and jewish canon, just with an inverted perspective on it. When it came to my preference christianization wouldn't have happened and paganism and natural religion would have stayed the european spiritual canon

>egalitarianism became marxism with a few definition changes like equality of opportunity -> equality of outcome and 'racism = prejudice + power'

egalitarianism has a lot of issues on its own, orthodox marxism only offers an egalitarian approach in relation to wealth and productive power (which I largely share). In general it's hard to create equality in all areas and often not even wise. I would argue that the works of the Frankfurter school (which I'm just gonna assume you mean as that's what most consider "cultural marxism") don't just directly predate the managerially engineered equality-ism we have now, Herbert Marcuse even predicted and warned about creating social diversity through means of repression, like we currently see with DEI bureaucracies disproportionately targeting white working class people, especially men.
I do share their pessimism about linear historical progress and think that a better future sometimes means experimenting, failing and ruthless critique of that failure. Determinism usually leads to bad outcomes

@dagda @Owl Nah I didn't take it defensively, as I said it's already too fucked to defend anyway lmao. I think the religious element of it is because it's a more palatable identity to rally behind than a racial one. I'm concerned that it'll go too far (again) but it can't be much worse than what we currently have or what the alternatives would be. If nothing else christians are more tolerant of non believers than jews or muslims have ever been or ever will be.

> It's just baffling to see as an ex-catholic satanist

Oh hey me too, well kinda. I was more agnostic/CofE then got exposed to catholic indoctrination during high school years (~12-16) and rebelled. Used to consider myself LaVeyan Satanist, but since his death it's really gone downhill and contradicts basically everything he proposed. I'm more of a LaVeyan Iblisist now, there's a much greater evil to oppose than the cults of a jewish hippy carpenter. My dad was pagan, I prefer Norse mythology personally but both are superior to the white light trio.

> egalitarianism has a lot of issues on its own

True, but it still seems the most moral from my perspective. As equal a starting place as capitalism allows for anyway. People can't even agree to a definition of what equality is, so it's impossible to reach. To me it's just if a white acts like a nigger then he's a nigger, if a black acts like not a nigger then he's not a nigger. Take the best person for the job whilst sticking to only relevant factors, which can include someone's appearance/intrinsic attributes if it's a front facing job or a female's chance of requiring maternity leave etc.

> the works of the Frankfurter school (which I'm just gonna assume you mean as that's what most consider "cultural marxism"

I don't really bother differentiating tbh, socialism's just retarded and far too against human nature to work. I'm a lolbertarian, any power given to a government is going to be misused as inevitably only the worst of our species ends up in those roles sooner or later. Allowing them to redistribute is a terrible idea.

> I do share their pessimism about linear historical progress and think that a better future sometimes means experimenting, failing and ruthless critique of that failure.

I still like LaVey's idea of fragmenting societies into different systems and letting people choose where to live then letting it run out their courses. Kind of like a petri dish experiment, communism starves itself out, capitalism greeds itself out, the religious annihilate one another over petty differences in interpretation, and any survivors would have more concrete knowledge (and less excuses) to progress from if they so choose. But honestly I think any system we've thought up thus far fails when it's scaled up, but if they don't scale up then they get swept away by scaled up systems with shorter time limits. It's an awkward problem to solve.

sadness is a skill issue

CC: @Sui@decayable.ink @dagda@netzsphaere.xyz @Owl@shitpost.cloud @Wiz@loli.church