Conversation
why does the american food label distinguish between sugar and added sugar and even pretend you need different amounts per day?
5
0
4
@snacks capitalism

I think it's too bad they don't add GI (glycemic index) to the label, carbs are carbs anyway sugar or not,
2
0
1
@sampler simpler carbs usually cause more insulin to be released don't they?
1
0
1
@snacks the difference is that simpler carbs (eg sugar) cause insulin to be released more rapidly, more complex carbs (eg whole wheat bread, many vegetables, beans) are processed more slowly so the rate at which insulin is produced & absorbed is slower, makes them easier on the body / more friendly to type 2 diabetics and larger people, keeps you fuller longer and keeps giving you energy over the longer term for everyone

t. type 1 diabetic , so glycemic index is not a huge thing for me personally but still something i have learned about for the sake of educating type 2 diabetics and adjacents
1
0
2
@snacks a tragic amount of type 2 diabetics in indonesia think chowing down on mountains of rice and instant noodles is totally fine because "it's not sugar!" but from a nutrition standpoint they are not really that different from sugar
1
0
2
@snacks it's helpful for knowing which sugar amounts are just fiber. Also it's not about how much sugar you need per day but the recommended max amount because we eat too much
1
0
2
@eris but it already says what's fiber? As well as what part of the carbs are sugars
3
0
1

@snacks @eris stop trying to make sense of the stupid shit americans do

1
0
1
@eris and yeah, "non-added" sugar doesn't seem to factor into the % daily value which is just nonsensical
1
0
0
@snacks the percentage is for both combined
1
0
1
@eris then it's in a really awkward spot for that but at least makes sense
0
0
1
@snacks @eris and all carbs that are not fiber equally become glucose in your body so from one point of view, sugar and grains/fruit/beans/etc are not that different
0
0
1

@fiore @snacks @eris im still confused on what y’all think is confusing about this

2
0
0
@karebu @fiore @eris what changes about sugars when they're added? Also because of the placement of the % daily value i assumed it's only added sugars
1
0
1

@snacks @fiore @eris its for making informed purchasing decisions, not necessarily a health distinction, like a bottle of juice, you can see how much sugar is from the fruit itself and if they add extra sugar exactly how much they’re adding

2
0
1
@karebu @fiore @snacks yeah no one gets diabetes from just eating whole foods all the time. It's the insane amount of sugar dumped into everything
0
0
1

@snacks @fiore @eris but also like important to consider, if a fruit already has a bunch of sugar you don’t want to constantly drink bottles with added sugar thats why there’s a recommended daily limit

1
0
0
@karebu @fiore @snacks @eris i literally used to work with an older guy who gave himself diabetes because he would drink like a fucking half gallon of "no sugar added" mango juice literally every day.
1
0
2
@sampler @snacks third worlders have outdated views of nutrition due to famine shocks, however this should solve its due to hormuz oil shock #massdeath
0
0
0
@snacks i always thought the added sugar was "the this is what we put in for taste" vs the normal sugar that came from idk.. fruit or something.
tbh ive never thought much about it
0
0
2

@sampler @snacks isn’t glycemic index harder to calculate?

1
0
0

@sampler @snacks idk if you had a large scale system for it you could probably do it okay. would help a lot

0
0
1