Conversation

opening up a job position for text editors , requirements:

  • not gnu
  • terminal based
  • easily extensible . i like lua , but ill take whatever
  • vi binds . not kakoune binds . vi binds .
  • will be mantained in one year

nvi is an option , but im looking for others too

please boost 🔁, and send your applications

9
1
2
@fiore >Application excludes all good text editors.
0
0
0
also rule 2, while it can be used in terminal, I feel like the experience is a lot better with the actual GUI

CC: @twinspin6@outerheaven.club
0
0
1
@snacks @fiore that is nvi in most cases

also nvi isnt really easily extensible tbh. thats part of its charme for me theres nothing to fiddle with its perfect as is
2
0
3
@fiore visual studio enterprise 2026
0
0
2
isn't that also breaking rule 1

CC: @fiore@brain.worm.pink
1
0
0
@fiore @coolbean i don't think it's maintained anymore tbh
0
0
2

@twinspin6 i nevr say that but theres 3 ppl ragebaiting in my replies rn sorry 😭

1
0
1
@snacks @fiore realistically ex mode in any vi-like editor can do similar things even if structural regex is a way better language for doing this
0
0
3
@eris @fiore ehm i just forgor that's also gnu
don't tell the extremists
1
0
1

@twinspin6 genuinely the one piece of software that singlehandedly generated my hate for gnu software

3
0
1
@fiore well yeah it is kind of annoying
especially the man page
1
0
1
@twinspin6 @fiore @eris We already know all the popular GNU programs off by heart.
0
0
1

@coolbean @snacks i consider “being able to display shell output in its ui , and run shell commands” already extensible

2
0
1
@coolbean @fiore @twinspin6 I had nothing to do with the pre-existing hate of GNU/Freedom.

All I've done is make the freedom shine brighter.
1
0
0
Idk about the extensible part, but kate and/or gnome builder
both have vim bindings and especially kate is a very solid text editor which I never really had to extend at all since it did everything i needed
1
0
0

@rose requirement 2 is quite important to me unfortunately , hell even gnome-text-editor has a vi mode , but like . bweh

1
0
1

@lizzie im so sorry its so confusing wdym d deletes one character 😭 that s so so wrong

2
0
2
@fiore @lizzie you delete more than one character by selecting more than one character, say by hitting w
2
0
1

@coolbean @fiore yeahh it all works in terms of selections

1
0
1

@lizzie @coolbean vim too but like . i want vims binds . they make more sense to me . dd deletes a line . dw deletes a word

0
0
2

@fiore @coolbean ohhh. im ngl i never got used to the vi world so i was really happy when i found helix and it seemed a lot more intuitive and composable

2
0
1
@lizzie @fiore did they finally mainline the plugin system?
1
0
1

@lizzie @coolbean w selects a word in kakoune ???????? wtf ?????? hell no

1
0
2
@fiore @lizzie thats how it works in vim too just the other way around
1
0
1

@fiore @coolbean @lizzie in vi, dw selects the delete action and then selects a word to delete. kakoune just flips the two steps so you can see the selection being made before committing to deleting it.

1
0
0

@shitpostalotl @coolbean @lizzie that is not normal that is an abomination of the natural order of things .

2
0
1

@shitpostalotl @coolbean @lizzie wdym selecting a word is eb ?? thats not intuitive at all…

viw : visual mode , i for inside meaning without the surrounding delimeters, w for word . select the word . simple . vaw for including the delimeters

0
0
0

@fiore @coolbean @lizzie ok that’s stupid. just because something isn’t what you’d expect or are used to doesn’t make it an abomination. you’re being cucked by your familiarity.

the actual abomination with kakoune is the config language. it’s turing complete but everything is text expansions and shell calls.

1
0
0

@shitpostalotl @coolbean @lizzie im being silly calling it an abomination sorry i didnt make it clear , id just like to have smth familiar that makes more sense to me

1
0
1