Like islam did enter through foreign invasions, the invaders did make slavery a widespread practice when it was far.more niche in antiquity and significantly curbed, theu did promote a forgeign hegenomy and in many cases carried out forced conversions. There was also times to abject hostility towards non muslims.
Obviously did had many harmful effects to the culture.

And add to that the whole creation of pakistan on the rhetoeic of "Hindus and Muslims are separete nations", in that sense one nation was constantly hostile and carried out constant invasions unto the other....

As for india and pakistan

Not to.mention hindus there are a single digit percentage now the muslim population here has only increased in proportion from the pre partition era
(hate to say it like that but it is safe to assume that despite a bunch of horrifying stuff the treatment of minorities between nations is heavily skewed)
Not to mention that pakiatan is an openly religious state promoting one religion and who knows if that os abused or not.

Meanwhile while hindus definitely abuse their majority and carry out hostile acts at leaat we are a a secular country which has some laws to precent.majority abuse. (and rhe whole hell with the waqf board ignored)

Also that there were boards to manage sitea for minority religions in pakistan and an agreement was to make board members of these groups but they are all muslims there and the sites are ofc in a terrible state

And then the actions in Bengal which are simply horrifying...


Like obviously most people are just fine, and innocent people hatwd are abused and hurt in turn for no fault of their own

I hate that but I still feel that the relationship is outrageously whitewashed and one directional.

@meeper when the Enemy has slaughtered five of your siblings, telling the remaining three you must be peaceable is an act of treason. you and anybody else saying "at least we are secular!" must be taught a lesson by your own, lest the Enemy teach you the same lesson and more harshly.