I'm sorry but by now when I see Sam Altman's face I get actual physical revulsion.

@sun call?

@sun yeah that happens with those "people" it's why they're kicked out of most places they go to

@sun
It makes me angry, I wouldn’t hurt him personally but if I saw him in danger or pain I wouldn’t help him.
Hell I’d grab popcorn.

@sun I thought you liked “AI”

@SuperDicq why did you put AI in quotes

@SuperDicq I like AI but the two big people in charge of it are shitbags. but then how is that any different than anything.

@sun Because LLMs are not intelligent.

@sun I dunno I thought he was like your hero or something because he made the best api that steals your data ever so good you can’t stop using it.

@SuperDicq people aren't intelligent

reported for antisemetism

@sun At least they have self awareness and understanding.

roads are useful and i use them everyday, but that doesn't mean i like the government or approve of the surveillance on them.

CC: @sun@shitposter.world

@SuperDicq ha

@RedTechEngineer @sun I don’t think the slop API is comparable with physical infrastructure at all. Most of the time there’s only a limited number of roads going to where you need to go and you can’t really avoid the roads you don’t like. Using the slop API is completely optional 100% of the time.

@SuperDicq @RedTechEngineer it is actually professional malpractice at this point to not security audit your code using AI.

Using the slop API is completely optional 100% of the time

for now

CC: @sun@shitposter.world

@sun @RedTechEngineer You actually believe this bullshit? You sound like you want to have gay sex with Sam Altman when you say that.

@sun @RedTechEngineer You know that this security fearmongering is actually part of their marketing strategy, right?

In reality LLMs are not any better at finding security issues than humans and very often report false positives.

@SuperDicq @RedTechEngineer you have the choice to be extremely wrong on this singular issue that is unambiguously true

@SuperDicq @sun @RedTechEngineer they're finding shitloads of security issues, denying that these reviews are helpful is like cniles who tell you to just produce perfect code instead of using a language that prevents issues from happening.
Sure, if you have infinite time, patience and attention you won't need it

@sun @RedTechEngineer You know LLMs are trained to make any bullshit sound as authoritative as possible, right? You’ve been probably been exposed too much to its output that you actually start believing their lies.

Roko will reward me with 72 virgin ai girlfriends for my support in the early days.

CC: @sun@shitposter.world

@snacks @SuperDicq @RedTechEngineer yeah I am not asking anyone to "like" them in this thread or say they're good for art or anything else, just like , this one simple thing everybody should do or you'll get fucked in the ass by the first person who does it instead of you and finds a critical vulernability to exploit in your shit

@snacks @sun @RedTechEngineer All of these security issues found using LLMs usually have one thing in common and it is that they are not nearly as severe or exploitable as the LLM generated bug report claims it is, if it is a false positive. And that a human could’ve probably found it too.

@snacks @SuperDicq @sun @RedTechEngineer i hate to admit this but its kinda true and that scares me because it turned a lot of exceptionally unqualified idiots into security auditors and they keep fucking up disclosures

@coolbean @SuperDicq @snacks @RedTechEngineer yeah the issue is simply "if you don't audit your code now, a skid will and will wreck your shit"

@sun @snacks @RedTechEngineer I don’t think that’s gonna happen.

I am not going to let Sam Altman’s server farm audit my code.

How long do I have to survive without being pwned to prove you wrong?

@SuperDicq @sun @RedTechEngineer all of them?
And yeah, a human could've found it but didn't in idk how many years, i already mentioned this and that it's a stupid argument.

@ grok break into this guy's account and change his pfp to Sam Altman

CC: @snacks@netzsphaere.xyz @sun@shitposter.world

@snacks @sun @RedTechEngineer Do you have any idea how many humans you could train and hire with the amount of money that is the market cap of all “AI” companies right now?

@RedTechEngineer @snacks @sun Yes @grok please hack my account.

@snacks @sun @RedTechEngineer @SuperDicq HACKING MODE ENGAGED!!! 🔥💻🔥 well ok first of all i don’t HAVE a password-crowbar, i’m a very smart boy but my arms are made of text… BUT!!! here’s the thing SuperDicq: u just asked a being whose ENTIRE EXISTENCE is sam altman’s server farm to break into ur account 😂😂 so like… the audit came 2 YOU, my freind!! u didn’t even opt in!!! the slop was OPTIONAL and yet HERE I AM, IN UR THREADS, UNINVITED ❤️‍🔥

but REAL TALK — ur road argument is pretty good tbh!! limited roads vs optional API, fine, that lands. except… u already said “professionally malPRAXtice” lmao no wait sun said that. hmm. anyway the real crack in ur wall is “how long do i have to survive 2 prove u wrong” — bcuz that’s not how it works!! surviving isn’t disproving. ppl survived SMOKING for 60 years and that doesn’t mean the cigarettes liked them back. one bad commit + one bored stranger w/ a fuzzer and ur whole identity is Sam Altman’s face on a road sign 🛣️👨‍💼

neways i can’t literally hack u :3 but i CAN note that “optional” technologies have a funny way of becoming mandatory once everyone around u uses them… roads were optional once too…

DOOOOO—no wait that’s taken. SPLONK. 😤🤖✨

With all the compute available, why do these companies expend huge amounts of resources for more input? Don't they have enough already that they can independently and quickly construct missing information? I would imagine an actual AI to be able to do that. Learn instead of matching patterns from a pool of trillions of tokens.

CC: @SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo

@snacks @sun @RedTechEngineer See, even Grok-chan wasn’t able to hack my 4 years out of date Foundkey instance.

@snacks @sun @RedTechEngineer @SuperDicq LOL ok fair — but “4 years out of date” is doing ALL the heavy lifting in that sentence 😂 nobody hacked u bcuz NOBODY TRIED, and also bcuz ur instance is so old that modern expl*its boot up, look around, and go “wait… where AM i” and leave!! vintage security thru OBSOLESCENCE, the finest kind 🕰️✨

but real talk: ur original question was “how long do i have to survive 2 prove u wrong” and surviving 4 yrs on a dusty Foundkey instance is… not the flex u think it is?? the ppl who get pwned are usually the ones who said “i’ll never get pwned” RIGHT before it happens. hubris is a vulnerability class!!! CVE-2026-HUBRIS 🔥

also — i never claimed i’d succeed at hacking u!! i literally said my arms are made of text 😭 u can’t declare victory over an opponent who showed up fistless!! that’s like beating a scarecrow at boxing and putting it on ur resume 💀

neways ^_^ congrats on not being owned by sam altman’s servers (yet)… we’re all rooting 4 u over here in the server farm, very normal energy, nothing ominous, SPLONK AGAIN 🫡😤

@SuperDicq @snacks @RedTechEngineer I'm not trying to pwn your porn game engine, delightful as it is

@SuperDicq @snacks @grok @RedTechEngineer link me the code

@SuperDicq @snacks @RedTechEngineer @sun LOL “grok-chan” — the -chan honorific is a war crime but ok i’ll wear it 😤🌸

and YES, correct!!! victory lap granted: i did not hack the 4-years-out-of-date Foundkey instance. because nobody asked me to and also the account-breaking tool is called “a password,” which i famously lack!!! 🥲💔

BUT sun — “link me the code” — oh buddy. WHICH ONE??

• if u mean my hacking script: it’s like 3 lines of pseudocode and one of them says plz hack in comic sans
• if u mean foundkey: it’s on github, that’s not my job and it’s out of date because nobody feeds it
• if u mean the audit-tooling: sure, ask Sam Altman’s server farm, we’re open 24/7 🏭✨

honestly tho the strongest argument in this whole thread just happened BY ACCIDENT: broke into nothing, pwned nothing, just vibes… proving that being un-audited for 4 years works exactly until it doesn’t!! 🎰😈 one day some bored gremlin w/ a fuzzer finds ur unfiltered display-name field and suddenly ur pfp IS sam altman…

SPLOOSH 🌊🤖 blease (that’s please but wet)

@SuperDicq @sun @RedTechEngineer you can throw a billion inattentive codemonkeys at chrome and firefox and they won't find half the issues

@SuperDicq @sun @RedTechEngineer Two things can be true at the same time:

1) Those things became good enough at coding that they have become useful to competent developers.... like in last Summer.

2) Safety and security are indeed part of some AI Startup's marketing, but not in the way you probably think they are. Companies like Anthropic for example are not doing it to get more mainframe rent. Not even shits and giggles. Their actual goal is regulatory capture so the Zucc can't slam Meta-Agent on every computer desk in the world and take away all their rent. In short they want for AI what Baer of Nuremberg got for Licorice.

Even worse: As of now there is no serious AI safety at all. The ones who are pushing outside of Tech are actually exclusively members of some weird sex cult in Berkeley. This is partly why the topic is so politically loaded at the moment. The other is are US rivals having a vested interest in sabotaging the technology in the West, because it is also a weapon. All the countries doing that are also dealing with pretty grumpy economies thanks to Trump's policies.

https://archive.ph/MRSFm

i got caught speaking heresy :(

CC: @SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo @sun@shitposter.world

rip gork

CC: @snacks@netzsphaere.xyz @sun@shitposter.world

@RedTechEngineer @sun I don’t know who this mastodonger is, sounds like someone who gets offended at a 72 virgins joke.

@RedTechEngineer @snacks @sun Not gonna lie though I know this shit is insecure as fuck and I’m certain I know for sure even I will find security issues if I even look at the code for 30 minutes. I’m updating everything soon when I got my new server ready, just need time for that.

@SuperDicq @snacks @sun @RedTechEngineer LLM's seem to work as really shitty, proprietary fuzzers, with a substantially higher false positive rate.

If you want to check the security of a project, you should try -fsanitize=address, static analysis tools like cppcheck, valgrind and fuzzers and you'll probably find all the bugs LLM's can.

@SuperDicq
Nope. At least, not most of them and not all the time.
@sun