Conversation
2
1
2
0
0
3
@cell they’re supposed to be very good but these compacts and the Fuji are trendy so they’re jacking the price up
1
0
1
Haelwenn /элвэн/ 
lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
4
0
2
Gay, loud and annoying ! 
hj@shigusegubu.club
3
0
0
cell classic
cell@shitposter.world
@gray i've handled the predecessor, the GRIII and it was very nice for a compact, i can understand why they would jack up the price considering its popularity, i just think that it doesn't warrant leaving out some major upgrades and fixes along the way..
1
0
1
cell classic
cell@shitposter.world
4
1
2
Haelwenn /элвэн/
lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
0
4
@cell 1. who the fuck is buying a camera in that size
2. what the fuck
2. what the fuck
0
0
0
Gay, loud and annoying !
hj@shigusegubu.club
2
0
4
Haelwenn /элвэн/
lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
0
0
0
1
0
7
1
0
1
3
4
12
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
@cell I haven’t followed it too much but I’d heard people saying the GRIII was a great less expensive alternative to Fuji x100 of the time.
0
0
0
@lanodan @snacks @meso @cell i repair printers and i will say that Canon is rather solid across the board except the low end inkjet models that people expect to print 103837382 pages on 90€
The laser units you actively have to abuse with a hammer or knife to break (which is valid). Can't speak for the software experience though, but I've had models sent to me that have been dropped down stairs and they print just fine, as long as the fixing/fuser and ITB is intact.
The laser units you actively have to abuse with a hammer or knife to break (which is valid). Can't speak for the software experience though, but I've had models sent to me that have been dropped down stairs and they print just fine, as long as the fixing/fuser and ITB is intact.
1
0
1
0
0
1
SCPH-50004 
(魚)
xian@ak.kazuma.family
@lanodan @snacks @meso @cell its a scam until you want to print borderless or on photo paper / art/rag paper. Most people don't do that often enough though and should just go to a print shop for the occasion which probably have some high end inkjet models or imagepress kind of stuff. (Lasers suck at photos)
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
SCPH-50004 (魚)
xian@ak.kazuma.family
@meso @snacks @lanodan @cell the cheapest ones to use long term are eco tank / ink tank models. The cartridge ones are seriously stupid considering you have to clean the print heads on inkjet printers from time to time to retain quality, which means emptying ink from the head/cartridge. But if you're going to print photos the options are slim, its sucking or sucking a bit less essentially.
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
BitterPill
BitterPill@poa.st
@xian @snacks @meso @lanodan @cell Xerox used to make these neat solid ink printers. They'd have a long start up time to melt the ink but then maintain temperature like a coffee machine to remain ready for printing until shut down. Great print quality, not sure about nozzles clogging since it works a lot like an inkjet but obviously different due to the heat to melt the ink.
But yeah, now it's either Epson ecotanks for inkjets (everything else sucks or is a ripoff) or one of the million options of laser printers only a few of which are good.
But yeah, now it's either Epson ecotanks for inkjets (everything else sucks or is a ripoff) or one of the million options of laser printers only a few of which are good.
0
1
0