the issues around christian soteriology are so one-sided. why can't monergism be true in some rare cases while synergism is true in most? why can't some be genuinely chosen by God not for any positive merits, and others by their own good samskaras combined with the movement of grace? why can't infant baptism be appropriate in some cases and a baptism of believers in others?
and why can't the eucharist sometimes have the real presence of Christ and sometimes be only a remembrance, depending on the holiness of the priest, on the virtue of the person who eats/drinks it, and foremostly on the will of the divine presence to manifest? why can't all things occur by God's sweet will, including the free will of humans? and why can't we just leave it to this will whether or not someone is saved without making assumptions about the unbaptized and the "heretic"?