@GoyGirl @Terry i don't like the language of 'war crimes,' because it is legalist-positivist slop. crimes are constructs of a state, and there is not currently a one world state, nor should there be. ergo, each state can define war crimes its own way, so if committing war crimes justifies x, y, and z actiona against you, states can simply twist definitions to justify x, y, z, and history tells us, somehow also.significantly more violent w against anybody and anything that stands between them.and maximum tax revenue.
nevertheless, the instinct to recoil at some of the stuff israel does is not entirely unsound. as i said in another thread, open bloodlust is a symptom of anger, and wanton bloodlust of a man consumed by anger. any people, subjected to isra'el's present condition in the middle east, would do what they're doing to palestinians -- at least, any people that has a shred of self-respect and wants to live. isra'el's excesses are in trying to maliciously rope other nations into their conflicts, cheat them out of resources, attack and destroy nations that are not in their way, and abuse the mandate of a nation to defend its people in an attempt to restore entirely imagined irredenta of their fictional jew-empire.