Posts
66579
Following
388
Followers
2011
weclome to my website!!
$PAGE_VIEWS
blobcatnompeachblobcatautismblobcatgrimacing

georiga on telegram
georgia@trashserver.net on xmpp
(response times may vary)

debianxfcelineageos2fdroidraspberrypi

तत् त्वम् असि

I post silly cats
sad!
0
0
0
Calvin had this guy burned at the stake for his religious views btw
0
0
0
fuck man
0
1
2
I love this anecdote
0
0
1
bro is talking about egregores
0
0
1
LUTHER SUCKS!!
3
1
2
I get Eckhart's God vs Godhead now. basically God as involved with his creation and the transcendent Brahman
1
0
1
okay here huxley is based, certainly for his time
0
0
0
huxley needs to shut the fuck up
1
0
0
@meso the worst part is how he compares pseudoscience to the different kinds of yoga and then says "science affirms the ancient ways, see?"
0
0
0
this is so freaking silly
4
0
0
bro is comparing bhakti/karma/jnana yoga division to this pseudoscience
1
0
0
right after that passage. theyre the same thing huxley!!! what the duck!! (keeping that typo)
1
0
0
bro really seems to think some english poet preist guy is a better yogi than the rishis/sages. perhaps I'm being uncharitable with this heights and fullness thing.
1
1
1
God doesnt grant siddhis for sins (self infliction of pain) huxley
1
0
0
so it turns out Huxley just doesnt know what hes talking about and describes two paths to yoga as fundamentally different, without realizing that each path yields both results (knowledge of God within and knowledge of God without). he seems deceived by one path leading to reincarnation and the other to nibanna (allegedly). what I see here is non-preference for pairs of opposites so that they merge into one nondual, or a form of yajna (sacrificing ones will to the divine will)/karma yoga (selfless service). this is yoga!!
0
0
1
Show older