@nerthos @shibao honestly wielding God as a weapon isnt Christlike so its not just disagreeable to Toraic sensibilities

@nerthos @shibao oh I agree with you on that

@Hyperhidrosis @vitalis what

@Vo @nova so am I

@nova

NOVA PLEASE ACCEPT MY FOLLOW REQUEST

@genmaicha @vriska about what? who knows

@shibao the worst sin in Christianity is denying the Holy Spirit when youve personally experienced it or seen its miracles. blasphemy can be defined as like, saying anything negative about God or Jesus. I dont think saying "the Bible isnt entirely of God" is blasphemy.

@vitalis taping a knife to a turtle isnt funny smh

@shibao God is perfect, Gods Word is perfect. the Bible isnt entirely Gods Word.

@shibao if the Bible isnt entirely Gods Word, then none of Gods Word is being rejected. you are operating by the axiom of total biblical infallibility, which is not axiomatic.

@genmaicha unitarian universalism is just progressivism plus God loves you

@shibao youre being irrational. if you believe Jesus was the messiah you are by definition a Christian. biblical infallibility is not part of the definition.

@Ree @shibao @toiletpaper miracles have happened to me even without prayer, of course prayer works then

@toiletpaper Etteilla, yeah :) I'm getting an etteilla based deck when benebel wen finishes it...

@toiletpaper @shibao renounce the fruits of your actions and devote every thing you do and experience as a sacrifice to God, and your sin can't touch you

@shibao Gods Word is perfect, the Bible is imperfect: partly Gods Word and partly not Gods Word. Partly man and partly God. if I were to break it down, the Torah being the oldest has the most human adulteration and Judean national myths, while the prophets who are later are more true to the people alleged to have spoken them. the writings which are even later are not even alleged to be divinely inspired. the New Testament would be the least dubious. Christ being God was infallible, but of course the New Testament wasnt written by Christ or even by prophets, it was written years later. if Christ is the Logos and reflects Gods Word completely, then the Q source if accurate would be totally infallible, but it hasnt been found. it really isnt hard to understand when you stop seeing the Bible as a monolith entirely from God. revelation is progressive and is perfect and entirely self consistent--its the Bible which doesnt entirely accurately reflect revelation.

@shibao the parts of the Bible about the Bible being totally infallible are fallible. simple.

the poasties aren't sending their best