Posts
66582
Following
388
Followers
2011
weclome to my website!!
$PAGE_VIEWS
blobcatnompeachblobcatautismblobcatgrimacing

georiga on telegram
georgia@trashserver.net on xmpp
(response times may vary)

debianxfcelineageos2fdroidraspberrypi

तत् त्वम् असि

I post silly cats
this entire chapter sucks bad honestly.
1
0
0
much of this buddhist shit I just dont understand yet I understand the hindu scripture here quite intuitively.
1
0
0
I hate this quotation so freakin much!! God wouldnt make a trap of samadhi.
0
0
0
kabir is so freakin based
1
0
0
or its meant to mean personal vs impersonal God I guess smdh
0
0
1
yeah I dont like when people distinguish God from Godhead in that way. like one is superior to the other for its involvement in the material world. for me it is nirguna brahman, saguna brahman, atman, and ishvara
1
0
1
you lost me man, what does this mean
1
0
0
I mean sola fide and sola scriptura are literally soul killing
1
0
2
honestly in my view it is despite muhammad and despite luther that great mystics came from either persuasion
1
0
2
yeah huxley you should really explain who these people are
1
0
0
without a doubt the greatest muslims are Sufis and yet modern political muslims would love to have Sufism extinguished, it is such a crime
2
0
0
repeated
this kitten was in my yaoi folder for some reason
4
5
9
@shibao you can tell he has some degree of incredulity over Buddhists not believing in God or the soul its pretty hilarious
0
0
0
@shibao I mostly love reading the quotations and Huxley doesnt get in the way too much with his analysis of them
1
0
0
yeah I still dont understand why Buddhism doesnt believe in Atman
1
0
1
okay the perennial philosophy slaps so far
1
2
2
unlike catholicism in my understanding protestantism has produced few to no major saintly people with genuine experiential knowledge of the absolute, though it seems that the christian theosophists (not to be confused with the later theosophy movement) had a general philosophical idea of it it
0
0
0
Show older