Posts
70383
Following
406
Followers
2036
weclome to my website!!
$PAGE_VIEWS
blobcatnompeachblobcatautismblobcatgrimacing

georiga on telegram
georgia@trashserver.net on xmpp
(response times may vary)

debianxfcelineageos2fdroidraspberrypi

तत् त्वम् असि

I post silly cats sometimes
@technicallydifficult @lizzie @sathariel @waypastfuture I havent eaten beef in like four years though, that has been consistent
0
0
2
@technicallydifficult @lizzie @waypastfuture @sathariel I also feel naughty af when I eat pork but I made like five or six vows not to. yet I recently partook in bushs baked bean comfyblood
3
0
2
@Alex sorry for the lack of glossary lol
0
0
1
imo bodhisattvas have a role to play in Gods lila but they aren't above buddhas and they certainly aren't above God. God is mankinds infinitely compassionate helper, by His grace all are liberated in their time. isnt that enough?
1
0
0
lowkey livetooting this book lol
1
0
3
huxley calls out Buddhism on the absurdity of some of its doctrines earlier in the book but more or less loudly espouses the idea that mahayanas are more enlightened than yogis/buddhas who dont reincarnate
1
0
2
some of this guys ideas are half-baked, and I know half-baked
0
0
0
huxley's distinction between the heights (nibbana) and the fullness (not preferring nibbana nor samsara, and thus effectively choosing samsara but also youre wholly enlightened apparently? dubious) of realizing the "Ground" is nonsensical. when someone dies in nibbana or mahasamadhi they become Brahman. Brahman is the height and the fullness, it is the transcendent Godhead and everything in samsara--purusha and prakriti. Huxley calls something else "the heights and the fullness", which I have yet to read. I'm sure it will annoy!
1
0
0
fucked up that quietism is talked about on wikipedia without mention of yoga.

imagine a hindu imprisoning another for lack of orthodoxy? suppressing an innocuous and even virtuous sect? unthinkable!
0
0
1
@Guiles I like Taoism but the idea of an extinction of consciousness due to the wrong kind of dhyana is pure evil. the bodhisattva ideal is very different from what the Buddha taught, which was the beauty of nibbana.

1
0
0
this entire chapter sucks bad honestly.
1
0
0
much of this buddhist shit I just dont understand yet I understand the hindu scripture here quite intuitively.
1
0
0
I hate this quotation so freakin much!! God wouldnt make a trap of samadhi.
0
0
0
kabir is so freakin based
1
0
0
or its meant to mean personal vs impersonal God I guess smdh
0
0
1
yeah I dont like when people distinguish God from Godhead in that way. like one is superior to the other for its involvement in the material world. for me it is nirguna brahman, saguna brahman, atman, and ishvara
1
0
1
you lost me man, what does this mean
1
0
0
Show older