Posts
75104
Following
406
Followers
2071
weclome to my website!!
$PAGE_VIEWS
blobcatnompeachblobcatautismblobcatgrimacing

georiga on telegram
georgia@trashserver.net on xmpp
(response times may vary)

fedoradebiankdenewxfcesailfishoslineageos2fdroidraspberrypi

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि त्वं ब्रह्म असि अयम् आत्मा ब्रह्म सर्वं खल्विदं ब्रह्म
@RustyCrab ive only heard of Morgan freeman ive never seen one of his movies
1
0
1
@anemone its hard to explain. especially since in truth there is neither living nor inert. all is pure consciousness (the mind of God)
1
0
0
@RustyCrab Rupert has a soul which is immaculate compared to Cosby
1
1
0
@anemone something that has a soul and thus transmigrates, its karma leading it to rebirth after rebirth until by grace it is liberated and returns to God
1
0
0
@anemone hmmm I guess youre right but still, whatever has a soul is alive. and souls can only be given by God.
1
0
0
@anemone I mean there kinda is: is it a taxon of life? would say with the exception of prions and viruses its kinda black and white.
1
0
0
@f0x @pwm @graf new dont tread on me: "hands off my rangoons"
0
0
1
@anemone pretty sure he addresses your point and says its the unique configuration of a brains parts that allows it to understand chinese. like how he says the room with pipes and hydraulics made in the configuration of a brain can understand chinese. (I havent read the paper in a while I may be missing something) I do disagree that computers can have souls, although they may be possessed by spirits I guess. inert matter doesnt gain a soul because it is treated with a special process, only God can ensoul a being.
1
0
0
@f0x @pwm @graf I only have one genetic disease and its a very minor single nucleotide polymorphism
0
0
0
@anemone the syncretism of Hellenic and Hebraic thought is the foundation of the west but the concept of the free world ought to be rejected
1
0
2
@f0x @pwm @graf I dont like crab or cream cheese so not a fan
2
0
1
PRAKRITI IS INSENTIENT AND WILL ALWAYS BE INSENTIENT!!!
0
0
0
ive heard it called the Virat but I think Viraj is more common
0
0
0
@anemone what's your take on it? I very much agree with the traditional perspective, except that I think only humans can understand chinese because we have souls which is different from his milquetoast opinion that a sufficiently advanced computer could understand chinese.
1
0
2
@vriska Iran sucks but were even worse
0
0
0
Show older