[3/3] a killer who is on their side.

[2/3] good". The implicit assumption is that the people that can use the data to punish you are good, and will always and only punish bad acts. The reality of surveillance is the opposite of that. Massive surveillance helps deportation thugs find immigrants and attack them, sometimes lawfully and sometimes not. But it doesn't deter the deportation thugs from murdering people[1] [2] on the street. The trumpets who control the surveillance don't allow access to the surveillance data to catch

[1/3] https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/26/xprize-founder-says-humans-behave-better-when-theyre-being-watched/
https://stallman.org/glossary.html#thug
https://stallman.org/glossary.html#thug
https://stallman.org/archives/2025-nov-feb.html#12_January_2026_(Masked_deportation_thug_murdered_Renee_Nicole_Good)
https://stallman.org/archives/2025-nov-feb.html#29_January_2026_(Alex_Pretti_shot_dead_by_deportation_thugs)

A number of tech bros argue that total surveillance will make everyone "be

Carte-de-visite from my collection, 1880s. If you don’t know what a carte-de-visite is: https://www.britannica.com/technology/carte-de-visite

Mauritian tomb bat (Taphozous mauritianus)

📸 Frank Vassen (CC BY)

💬 Suggest alt text: https://github.com/querkmachine/bat-bot/issues/new?labels=image+description&template=image-description.yml&title=Image+description%3A+Taphozous%20mauritianus%201.jpg&filename=Taphozous%20mauritianus%201.jpg