Posts
74720
Following
404
Followers
2066
weclome to my website!!
$PAGE_VIEWS
blobcatnompeachblobcatautismblobcatgrimacing

georiga on telegram
georgia@trashserver.net on xmpp
(response times may vary)

fedoradebiankdenewxfcesailfishoslineageos2fdroidraspberrypi

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि त्वं ब्रह्म असि अयम् आत्मा ब्रह्म सर्वं खल्विदं ब्रह्म
@sun honestly i should just read sankaras commentary on the upanishads and stop bothering you lol. although i do have one last question, what tier of kagi did you use for this? is this their research AI model?
1
0
0
@lain funny, kagi said that vasanas are within the causal and samskaras in the subtle, and claude the opposite. i like this though.
1
0
0
@lain i didnt check the links i just read the screenies, and the answer to my first question is in line with my current understanding while i find the answer to the second question quite egregious. the brahman is sacchidananda. i can find nothing on the "golden trap" as well.
0
0
1
i still think ai sucks and that if i were really smart i would have a proper guru and not an llm. but you know, im stupid and impatient.
0
0
0
@lillian @genmaicha i think hes joking about basil being an ingredient
1
0
0
@sun sorry to keep bothering you, but can you ask it "why is prajna is called the lord of all/the knower of all/and the inner controller and doesnt that refer to saguna brahman/ishvara in vedanta"
1
0
0
and its not a sheath, but something something upadhis. upadhis explain everything in advaita vedanta, okay.
0
0
1
so sankara calls it a sheath, but the word used is embodied self. interesting!
1
0
1
@anemone @lain @sun it makes mistakes all the time though
1
0
0
@paula8 i know this actually. its compared to intoxication, and alcohol is haram. so, only religious music is allowed.
1
1
2
@sun well, i wanted more opinions and ramanujas take was only slightly useful (because the bhashya im reading already translates anandamaya as full of bliss). i havent read sri bhashya yet, but clearly he agrees with badarayana. but i agree with sankaras take based mostly on what im reading right now (i can screeny if you want) but also on this certainly. (honestly, i dont think it matters all that much! the scripture works either way. both arguments are compelling)

more helpful though is its explanation of the mandukya, which i never understood as i havent read shankaras commentary on the upanishads in full (only of the upansihads i really like). Turiya isnt the enjoyment of bliss, it is bliss itself.
1
0
0
googles llm says that without a doubt anandamaya is a sheath, not brahman itself. sankara 1, badarayana 0
0
0
0
@jeru most of my ideas are very half baked and i have no executive functioning skills, so im waiting for my best self to do things like write blog posts
1
0
1
rangtong buddhism sucks!!! (by this i mean all shunyavada buddhism, not just tibetans with this perspective)
0
0
0
@jeru did you just accuse me of being a buddhist angryduck
1
0
1
@jeru what does socmed mean was my question lol
1
0
1
kagi gave me a much better understanding of samskaras/vasanas than my prior education mostly from wikipedia and various blogs. but honestly, im not that interested in advaita vedanta! i want to learn trika!
0
0
0
Show older