Posts
74952
Following
405
Followers
2069
weclome to my website!!
$PAGE_VIEWS
blobcatnompeachblobcatautismblobcatgrimacing

georiga on telegram
georgia@trashserver.net on xmpp
(response times may vary)

fedoradebiankdenewxfcesailfishoslineageos2fdroidraspberrypi

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि त्वं ब्रह्म असि अयम् आत्मा ब्रह्म सर्वं खल्विदं ब्रह्म
Being/Knowledge isnt an action by God, it IS God. an action implies activity and it implies duality.
1
0
0
its a shame because theres much i love about trika
1
0
0
also, doesnt movement imply time as well as causation?
0
0
0
if trikas really do believe God is never at rest (static) even when the universe is dissolved and that God needs to vibrate in some way (subtly or grossly) to recognize Himself, i disagree. energy is moving consciousness, but consciousness isnt inherently energetic. but maybe reading source texts would persuade me otherwise. probably not, because "it moves--yet it moves not" is in the isha upanishad and i take the isha upanishad as absolutely divine. and God is called unmoving in other places in the upanishads as well.

anyway, i think i see where the trikas are coming from. if God knowing Himself is the universe and this process of self-understanding (called vimarsa) involves spanda inherently, then why wouldnt God knowing Himself involve spanda when the universe ceases? a trika would presumably say, consciousness inherently manifests as spanda, like shiva manifesting as shakti, but you know, oh well. it moves not! to me spanda is less an inherent vibration of self-knowledge, the heartbeat of consciousness, and more the deliberate creative vibration that vibrates and thus contracts consciousness, creating apparent limitations and diversity. to me it is mahamaya Herself.

a synthesis between monism of the vedantins and the tantrics would be very useful here! must i become such an acharya? right now my ideas are so half-baked... who knows... maybe God will talk to me more...
1
0
0
passibilists and process theologians: you can make God suffer and God cant affect your free will.

monists: God isnt us, we are God.
0
0
1
instead of diminishing God for the sake of theodicy the process theologians and passibilists (despite my former post im not a passibilist, im an absolute monist who believes the world is real) should just be universalists (and ideally, monists, but you cant have everything)
1
0
1
i have a tummy ache smdh. pooping this one out will be highly unpleasant.
1
0
3
but of course, trika is superior to them both, naming this one thing God is--- consciousness!
0
0
0
somehow im a vaisnava and not a jew when the vaisnavas get this wrong and my ancestors gets this right
2
0
0
God both experiences everything we do and remains detached from it, obviously.
0
0
1
hmmmmm yes. why i like divine passability from a monist perspective, i do not like process theology.
2
0
1
can someone find my post on "i am that i am"
2
0
0
cant believe i let myself forget devanagari
0
0
0
white person spotted
0
0
2
list of bible translations to reject
2
0
3
dammit kagi i dont want a "reconstructed analysis" i want the real thing from real trika masters
0
0
0
bro kagi quick cited a goddamn instagram post, what the fuck
1
1
1
Show older