Posts
70315
Following
404
Followers
2029
weclome to my website!!
$PAGE_VIEWS
blobcatnompeachblobcatautismblobcatgrimacing

georiga on telegram
georgia@trashserver.net on xmpp
(response times may vary)

debianxfcelineageos2fdroidraspberrypi

तत् त्वम् असि

I post silly cats sometimes
okay here huxley is based, certainly for his time
0
0
0
its amusing to hear him describe christians of his time as following a cult of "things will be better in future time thanks to limitless progress" whereas now christians hanker after previous times and only Godless capitalists and consumers worship the future
3
0
2
he just calls good and correct religions like taoism vedantic hinduism and early christianity cerebrotonic. maybe theyre just good and correct.
1
0
2
huxley needs to shut the fuck up
1
0
0
his criticism of protestantism is quite funny
1
0
0
bro is comparing bhakti/karma/jnana yoga division to this pseudoscience
1
0
0
basically I read this book for the quotations
2
0
1
bro really seems to think some english poet preist guy is a better yogi than the rishis/sages. perhaps I'm being uncharitable with this heights and fullness thing.
1
1
1
God doesnt grant siddhis for sins (self infliction of pain) huxley
1
0
0
huxley thinks I speak french for some reason, lots of frenchisms in this book including whole passages which I will NOT care to translate
1
0
1
huxley tires me. of course God is in the world! why all the pomp in declaring a way different from realization of God within that isnt actually different, but is understood by all those who find God within? to find God in the world is literally a kind of jnana yoga, no?
0
0
1
Huxley also quotes people who are only philosophically similar to yogis and saints, without actually having experienced what they purport to describe, which bothers me
0
0
1
I wonder what this could mean, it sounds like sahaja samadhi to me but I'm probably wrong. having put so much faith in atman-as-brahman realization myself as the wannabe unachievable goal of my life it IRRITATES me that he says theres something better??;isnt realizing the Brahman within what leads to knowledge of the immanent AND transcendent God? or is this about nibanna vs samsara, more mahayana stuff? I will enquire further....
1
0
1
lowkey livetooting this book lol
1
0
3
huxley calls out Buddhism on the absurdity of some of its doctrines earlier in the book but more or less loudly espouses the idea that mahayanas are more enlightened than yogis/buddhas who dont reincarnate
1
0
2
huxley's distinction between the heights (nibbana) and the fullness (not preferring nibbana nor samsara, and thus effectively choosing samsara but also youre wholly enlightened apparently? dubious) of realizing the "Ground" is nonsensical. when someone dies in nibbana or mahasamadhi they become Brahman. Brahman is the height and the fullness, it is the transcendent Godhead and everything in samsara--purusha and prakriti. Huxley calls something else "the heights and the fullness", which I have yet to read. I'm sure it will annoy!
1
0
0
fucked up that quietism is talked about on wikipedia without mention of yoga.

imagine a hindu imprisoning another for lack of orthodoxy? suppressing an innocuous and even virtuous sect? unthinkable!
0
0
1
much of this buddhist shit I just dont understand yet I understand the hindu scripture here quite intuitively.
1
0
0
I hate this quotation so freakin much!! God wouldnt make a trap of samadhi.
0
0
0
kabir is so freakin based
1
0
0
Show older