Posts
72342
Following
417
Followers
2050
weclome to my website!!
$PAGE_VIEWS
blobcatnompeachblobcatautismblobcatgrimacing

georiga on telegram
georgia@trashserver.net on xmpp
(response times may vary)

debianxfcelineageos2fdroidraspberrypi

तत् त्वम् असि

I post silly cats sometimes
how can you wake up from the dream of separateness if you believe peoples souls are different? smdh
0
0
3
my main qualm with shankara is imo the material world is neither real nor non real, and both
0
0
1
honestly if you read the upanishads shankaras philosophy is close to the plain meaning of them. can't say the same about people like Madhva.
0
0
1
the ghatakasha is in at least one upanishad I can think of and may be in more, is the yoghurt and the milk? hmmm? gosh, now I realize why the materialist school doesnt except analogies as a path to knowledge...
0
0
1
tejobindu upanishad is goated too I forgot that one in my list.
0
0
0
why would the subtle body be detatched from in yoga and then a brahman body added after death? transcend nama-rupa...
0
0
0
the pancadhyaya is so freaking good man
0
0
0
I love george fox but quaker oats banana oatmeal is a war crime
0
0
1
the rasa lila chapters of the BP are almost perfect if not perfect. its the commentaries that have good and bad stuff, mostly good though
0
0
0
theres a more caitanya shit I could object to but I'll just leave it at this page. theres a lot of beauty in this sect but a lot I dont like, too.
1
0
0
I really dont understand why caitanyas are so concerned about "improperly mixed rasas" (devotional relationship attitudes towards God). like can't someone consider God their beloved, and their friend, and their Lord? why is this a problem? I really dont get it. maybe its because they want it to be without contradiction, allowing for complete absorption in the role? I just dont get it.
0
0
3
I think arcana will come back eventually
0
0
2
snow is so beautiful
1
1
1
I guess I'm annoying, oh well
3
0
1
smh guys God doesnt need ignorance to love infinitely and he isnt "controlled by" love for his bhaktas, he is the Lord of Love (among other qualities of saguna brahman). the whole element of the bhagavata purana where God describes himself as controlled like a puppet by his bhaktas is not literal sure, and maybe I dont understand divine love (I dont), but it bothers me. maybe God is just humble beyond my understanding.
0
0
1
english has its luminaries but its so confining...
0
0
0
tjs veggie soup dumplings are really disgusting while the chicken ones are heavenly what a crime
0
1
1
my hindu faves in no particular order:
-bhagavad gita
-isha upanishad
-taittiriya upanishad
-shvetashvatara upanishad
-tale of gajendra
-the rasa lila chapters
-naradas bhakti sutras
1
0
0
criticism of many vaishnavite sects
Show content
if serving God in goloka is the highest destination, then all will attain it one day. if oneness with God is superior, then all will attain it one day. why would God grant us chance after chance in life after life only to permanently confine someone to a lesser outcome in a judgment based on their last life?
0
0
1
you really lose a lot in translation it makes me sad
1
0
0
Show older