Posts
70315
Following
404
Followers
2029
weclome to my website!!
$PAGE_VIEWS
blobcatnompeachblobcatautismblobcatgrimacing

georiga on telegram
georgia@trashserver.net on xmpp
(response times may vary)

debianxfcelineageos2fdroidraspberrypi

तत् त्वम् असि

I post silly cats sometimes
where can a vaishnavite monist girlie find sridharas works in english
1
0
1
God is the exemplar of dharma but He is also beyond dharma and adharma, true.
0
0
0
must... attain the beloved...
0
0
1
repeated
all users of windows are suckers
5
5
5
oh my other qualm with shankara is I dont consider the Brahmans personality (ishvara) to be illusory or lower than brahman. although maybe shankara doesnt think the illusion part and its just suggested by his detractors?
0
0
2
it bothers me when people call shankara a buddhist, the buddha didnt believe in souls and didnt teach about a supreme deity.
0
0
3
I guess I criticize vaishavist vedantic and puranic thought so much because I want something thats perfect considering ive been called to vaishnavism. it would be easier to be a Kashmir shaivi as I initially wanted but God wanted me to be a vaishnavite.
1
0
2
how can you wake up from the dream of separateness if you believe peoples souls are different? smdh
0
0
3
my main qualm with shankara is imo the material world is neither real nor non real, and both
0
0
1
honestly if you read the upanishads shankaras philosophy is close to the plain meaning of them. can't say the same about people like Madhva.
0
0
1
the ghatakasha is in at least one upanishad I can think of and may be in more, is the yoghurt and the milk? hmmm? gosh, now I realize why the materialist school doesnt except analogies as a path to knowledge...
0
0
1
tejobindu upanishad is goated too I forgot that one in my list.
0
0
0
why would the subtle body be detatched from in yoga and then a brahman body added after death? transcend nama-rupa...
0
0
0
the pancadhyaya is so freaking good man
0
0
0
I love george fox but quaker oats banana oatmeal is a war crime
0
0
1
the rasa lila chapters of the BP are almost perfect if not perfect. its the commentaries that have good and bad stuff, mostly good though
0
0
0
theres a more caitanya shit I could object to but I'll just leave it at this page. theres a lot of beauty in this sect but a lot I dont like, too.
1
0
0
I really dont understand why caitanyas are so concerned about "improperly mixed rasas" (devotional relationship attitudes towards God). like can't someone consider God their beloved, and their friend, and their Lord? why is this a problem? I really dont get it. maybe its because they want it to be without contradiction, allowing for complete absorption in the role? I just dont get it.
0
0
3
I think arcana will come back eventually
0
0
2
snow is so beautiful
1
1
1
Show older