Posts
75142
Following
406
Followers
2071
weclome to my website!!
$PAGE_VIEWS
blobcatnompeachblobcatautismblobcatgrimacing

georiga on telegram
georgia@trashserver.net on xmpp
(response times may vary)

fedoradebiankdenewxfcesailfishoslineageos2fdroidraspberrypi

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि त्वं ब्रह्म असि अयम् आत्मा ब्रह्म सर्वं खल्विदं ब्रह्म
i really hope i'm not manic
2
0
0
monism is not shirk, it is tawhid
0
0
0
the greatest christian sermon ever composed was the sermon on the mount, but the greatest muslim sermon cannot be found in the quran
1
0
2
Ali was greater than Muhammad
1
0
0
for whatever reason three of my five senses are heightened at two or three times their normal peak. those being touch, smell, and taste. particularly touch and taste. its extremely distracting and applies to both desirable and noxious sensory stimuli. but the desirable reveals itself as noxious in many cases because of sheer overstimulation. honestly its very much like being sexually aroused with multiple senses, both pleasant and unpleasant, and very annoying. my entire body feels erogenous or painful or itchy, what the hell is wrong with me?
0
0
0
the vedantic monists say Brahman is passive, the tantric monists say Siva is active... but both passive and active imply duality! there is only Chit! this is why its best to just say God is non-dual and free. free means both free to and free from, which is the potency of dynamism and the detachment of passivity, which is also to say, God is both the ultimate agent and enjoyer and blissfully apart...
God is non-dual and free!
0
0
0
i already slept a little but not enough
0
0
0
time to attempt bed
0
0
0
lowkey kinda pisses me off that i can't figure out how to change my bio
0
0
1
i should eat oysters its fall
0
0
0
karma and transmigration is a great theodicy, but monism is the best theodicy
1
0
1
i'm just a cartoon cat
0
0
2
the vegetarian french onion soup from tjs makes me so happy
0
0
0
okay enough with the cattiness
0
0
0
in one part of his gita bhashya (i haven't read close to all of it, what a waste of time!) madhva glosses "Brahman" as "Lakshmi" if you want to know what he's like. there's no worse butcher of vedanta!
0
0
0
is there any greater hypocrite among hindus than one who denies the Self is God and then translates "atman" in vedantic texts as some name of God? it would be one thing if it were uncommon, but its extremely common.
1
0
0
if you call Brahman, the highest goal and purport of the upanishads, an "impersonal bodily effulgence" you have made an enemy of me
0
0
2
"Mahāvishnu, Garbhodakaśāyī Vishnu, Ksirodakaśāyī Vishnu" there is only one Vishnu and He doesn't need to "expand Himself" (hah! God is fullness itself!) to perform any function, being omnipotent and all-pervasive.
0
0
1
God is impartite but saying we are each a part of God attests to God's inexhaustability by us and the small role we have within the infinite lila of pure consciousness
0
0
0
oneness is the highest truth of the universe and beyond it. why say "or" when you can say "and"?
0
0
0
Show older