Conversation
georgia
georgia
>2/3 of republicans still think the election was rigged
this country deserves a civil war
this country deserves a civil war
0
0
2
@harblinger @dubh @pernia this is what i'm talking about, i never claimed 2016 was rigged. trump benefited from russian propaganda, sure, but there was no massive fraud that swung it to him.
1
0
0
@pernia @dubh you're just repeating what you've heard in trump media. it's absolute nonsense. every state uses vote counting software. vote tabulation machines have been used for over a century. you just want states that went for biden to be recounted, but not trump. how curious.
and name a single "dead person voting" that hasn't been since debunked. now name enough to swing the election. dumbass. you just repeat these meme words as if they mean something and aren't entirely hokum.
think about it. what is REALLY different about the 2020 election? it's that the crybaby who is pathologically incapable of admitting failure lost.
and name a single "dead person voting" that hasn't been since debunked. now name enough to swing the election. dumbass. you just repeat these meme words as if they mean something and aren't entirely hokum.
think about it. what is REALLY different about the 2020 election? it's that the crybaby who is pathologically incapable of admitting failure lost.
1
1
5
@pernia @dubh
name a single state that counts all its ballots by hand. you're just saying "wrong" without a shred of evidence.
as for "riots", what the fuck are you talking about? you're saying BLM stole the election? are you really that retarded?
your only remotely substantive point is mail-in ballots. because there was a fucking pandemic. yet still, in georgia when every mail-in ballot was rechecked TWICE, by hand, they did not find any fraud.
this is just a pathetic motte and bailey, where the bailey is that the landslide election was stolen with massive organized fraud, but the motte, "some dead people voted", "sharpies" is also bullshit.
name a single state that counts all its ballots by hand. you're just saying "wrong" without a shred of evidence.
as for "riots", what the fuck are you talking about? you're saying BLM stole the election? are you really that retarded?
your only remotely substantive point is mail-in ballots. because there was a fucking pandemic. yet still, in georgia when every mail-in ballot was rechecked TWICE, by hand, they did not find any fraud.
this is just a pathetic motte and bailey, where the bailey is that the landslide election was stolen with massive organized fraud, but the motte, "some dead people voted", "sharpies" is also bullshit.
2
0
1
@zemichi @dubh @pernia this is one of the most sophistic arguments i've heard on the internet and you need to accept two dubious premises for it to be remotely coherent. what you are saying is because democrats hate trump, and trump lost, the election was rigged, because who would let someone they hate win? and both of the people who liked your posts are abject morons.
1
0
0
@zemichi @dubh @pernia you missed my point. your entire argument rests on the premise that trump won, and that the only relevant question is whether or not democrats "let him" or not. trump was no less monstrous in 2016, and actually had less support among minorities, yet he won then. did he win because republicans thought the possibility of a hillary whitehouse was too horrible? i shouldn't be shocked that you think this constitutes evidence of massive malfeasance, yet somehow i am.
1
0
0
@pernia @dubh lmao i asked about a state that entirely counts by hand. your source affirms i was right, all the ones that hand count also tabulate by another method.
your other source is a deboonking of tards like yourselves, a tabulation error which was fixed.
and THE CAPITAL RIOTS WERE AFTER THE ELECTION! BY MONTHS! HOW COULD THEY INFLUENCE THE OUTCOME OF THE ELECTION!
holy shit you are dumb
your other source is a deboonking of tards like yourselves, a tabulation error which was fixed.
and THE CAPITAL RIOTS WERE AFTER THE ELECTION! BY MONTHS! HOW COULD THEY INFLUENCE THE OUTCOME OF THE ELECTION!
holy shit you are dumb
1
0
0
1
0
1
@zemichi @dubh @pernia my argument isn't that the election wasn't rigged because democrats are too scrupulous lol. it's that it wasn't rigged because there's no substantive evidence it was rigged. in response to me saying there's no evidence, you said "well they really hate him so why wouldn't they rig it". and now here we are.
0
0
0
@pernia @Kagekokoro @dubh @zemichi "sexually libertine isn't being liberal" is what you said, don't create sentences with deficient syntax and then complain when i "misinterpret them". you attributed to me a position i didn't say is what you did. i never said they are equivalent, that's a straw man wrought of whole cloth. i said liberals are sexually libertine. and cats are mammals. if you want to argue that liberals are in fact sexually puritanical, be my guest, but you will be, as in so many other things, wrong.
2
0
0
@pernia @Kagekokoro @dubh @zemichi "some liberals aren't libertine" no but the sexual revolution is a crown jewel of the modern progressive moment.
you're so pathetic. you couldn't prove bullshit election fraud claims, so now what? you've resorted to "your statement isn't axiomatic"? i hope that makes you feel like a big boy who hasn't been consistently eviscerated in every debate we've had.
you're so pathetic. you couldn't prove bullshit election fraud claims, so now what? you've resorted to "your statement isn't axiomatic"? i hope that makes you feel like a big boy who hasn't been consistently eviscerated in every debate we've had.
1
0
0
@zemichi @Kagekokoro @dubh @pernia wow, so your highly sophisticated take the average person isn't privy to really does amount to "why are liberals so ugly if they like sex LOL"
do average chinese women look like "ugly butch dykes"? no, they have highly rigid gender roles.
you really can't comprehend that "they don't want to please my pp >:(" doesn't equate to being anti-sex. they just want to expand the definition of fuckable, which is a liberal trait, or don't actually give a fuck, which is a radical trait.
do average chinese women look like "ugly butch dykes"? no, they have highly rigid gender roles.
you really can't comprehend that "they don't want to please my pp >:(" doesn't equate to being anti-sex. they just want to expand the definition of fuckable, which is a liberal trait, or don't actually give a fuck, which is a radical trait.
1
0
1