Corporate scum have wormed their way into all aspects of life. We need to bring back the guillotine.

https://www.zdnet.com/home-and-office/home-entertainment/your-roku-tv-will-be-unusable-if-you-dont-agree-to-the-companys-controversial-new-terms/

We need to stop tolerating this NOW

@alex
defective by design

@alex

Roku has been unusable since they killed of private channels.

@magicalthinking It's unacceptable that the ONLY TVs available these days are these stupid "smart" TVs. I hate everyone involved in this supply chain, including Costco, Walmart, Target, and every other idiot retailer. I hate the manufacturers who thought this was a good idea. And I hate the brain dead CONSOOMERS who vote with their wallet for convenience over freedom.

@magicalthinking "Enslave me, corporation daddy" - Average American

@magicalthinking @alex That sounds nice. I just got it like 4 months ago so didn't know about that

@alex @magicalthinking And who owns those companies, Alex? Most of the people at the top of their corporate ladders are jews or avowed zionists. They view us as cattle. Look into what Hitler did to the bankers and the international corporations when he took power. He stripped them of their resources and forced them to leave his country. Can anyone tell me they don't want to do the same at this point? The people responsible for these abusive corporations should either be tried for treason or exiled to some isolated hellhole.

@FRENZMagazine @magicalthinking Fat white man https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Wood_(businessman)

@FRENZMagazine @magicalthinking Mr White guy, can you please get through to Anthony Wood? He's one of "us" right? So he should get it.

@alex @magicalthinking Again, most corporate CEOs are jews or zionists. I didn't say "all." And you can bet most billionaires, zionists or not, are compromised. Ethnic jews control the banking system that they rely upon. Even billionaires, like Kanye West, can't speak out against them without severe punishments.

You can bet that, even if Anthony Wood himself isn't a zionist, he doesn't want to piss off the 6 companies that make most of the content he displays through his indoctrination boxes.

@FRENZMagazine @magicalthinking You have to jump through hoops for that conclusion. Mine is easier and correct.

@alex @magicalthinking What hoops do I have to jump through? These are three facts:

1. Ethnic jews control most of the media in our countries.
2. Ethnic jews control most of the financial system in our countries.
3. Billionaires who speak out against them have been publicly destroyed by a coordinated effort.

You haven't even disputed these facts, nor can you, as they're indisputably true.

@FRENZMagazine @alex

are we still talking about the Roku?

@magicalthinking @FRENZMagazine Apparently the white guy in charge of Roku is only exploiting his customers because of the Jews.

@magicalthinking @alex Indirectly. Roku's devices are a point of access. What are you accessing? Media made by subsidiaries of 6 different international conglomerates. These 6 conglomerates have formed a lockstep indoctrination machine that has allowed for the subversion of Western society. I'm merely pointing out the people who control these companies.

@alex @FRENZMagazine

I was talking about the private channels - which you didn't notice...
Private channels let you watch anything that was on the internet...

but you're fixated on...
and you're going to steer every conversation towards...
and burrowing into your skin...

@magicalthinking @alex Killing private channels was likely a move to help consolidate viewership onto their corporate channels. Do you disagree with that much?

@FRENZMagazine @alex

I have no proof of that beyond your conjecture.

@magicalthinking @alex I don't think there's much magical thinking required here. Forget about the political aspect, the people responsible, etc. What problems did private channels introduce for their operations? Here are some that come to mind:

Private channels could have presented content that they couldn't properly monitor, censor, or profit from. Perhaps some unsavory content got through, or content that they otherwise wanted to stop from spreading for ideological reasons. I'm 100% sure that some of the private channels allowed for piracy, as I witnessed people with such channels on their Roku TVs. Perhaps they didn't feel they were making enough money from the private channels.

I think these are reasonable presumptions, even if they aren't guaranteed to be the full picture. Forcing people to use their corporate channels is almost certainly more profitable than allowing for the use of private channels.

@FRENZMagazine @alex

I watched old skateboard videos and ufo abduction interviews.

@magicalthinking @FRENZMagazine I had never heard of this feature, but I don't see how it matters in their proprietary surveillance system anyway. There is no acceptable level of freedom under those terms.

@magicalthinking @alex I used to use private channels for similar content, including fringe paranormal stuff, UFOs, and other pretty innocuous entertainment, but that doesn't mean that's all that was available.

I see you're not convinced. Would you like another infographic? lol

@houseofosborne @alex @magicalthinking I'm not looking to harass the guy with infographics 😂 He seems to have similar sentiments towards large corporations to many of our guys, albeit for different reasons, so I couldn't help but chime in. I appreciate the civil discussion, even if he doesn't agree.

Dude. Step one, people hate the infographics, it makes you look like an insane person. HT can get away with it because he's intentionally ridiculous. Second, if you hadn't noticed, pretty sure Alex is an ethnic jew. So, getting him to hate his own people is not going to work for you.

@houseofosborne @FRENZMagazine @magicalthinking It's funny, when people argue against me they accuse me of being a Jew. Then when they argue for me I'm a fellow white man. So which is it? I am Persian mostly. Watching woke Nazis argue over whether or not I'm white is a fun introduction to far-right purity spiraling, exactly like leftists do.

@alex @houseofosborne @magicalthinking I didn't think about your race before engaging in discussion, if it matters. Our movement is for the betterment of our own folk (i.e. European people), which is why we gatekeep based on race, but I would be happy to see every other group start their own form of National Socialism, on their own land, to help their own people. Wanting the best for my people doesn't mean wanting harm on members of out groups--Hitler himself was very specific about that. In a sense, I'm advocating for the policies that I feel would be most beneficial to every group.

@FRENZMagazine @alex @houseofosborne @magicalthinking >Wanting the best for my people doesn't mean wanting harm on members of out groups
This is the thing I respect the most about Nazis, because I don't ever hear a similar thing from most groups. Libtards will say they want 'equity' and ignore the pain and damage their policies cause. National Socialists will say they want the best for their people and yours to have the same.

@houseofosborne @alex @magicalthinking Useful information. I might not have bothered if I'd known he was jewish. Regardless, public discussions are good to have. Someone might see it in passing and it might be the information they needed to get over the fence. I would also say that our magazine is somewhat over-the-top (while still being true), so I don't think distributing HT's material is off-brand for us.

Do whatever you like, just know the average person hates Nazis and that you are intentionally being provacative, which is a niche market.

@houseofosborne @alex @magicalthinking @FRENZMagazine If only the average person hated Communists as much as they've been propagandized over the past 70+ years to hate Nazi's.

Sure, but that world doesn't exist. You would have to win hearts and minds for anything to happen. And that will never happen if the Holocaust is never fully debunked. But it will never be debunked if you don't have the power to do so.

@houseofosborne @SurStromming @alex @magicalthinking @FRENZMagazine This is why I, as a NatSoc, am willing to drop the swastikas and jackboots in favor of creating the Fourth Reich. Keep the ideology, put the symbols in the museum, and thus the propagandized can focus on the tenets of the movement and not the imagery.

The issue, though, is that you will still lose. Who won WW2? Obviously the jews. You won't beat jews by acting like Nazis. I would think that would be obvious. The methods, the ideas of the Nazis totally failed and lost, for a reason. It's because those ideas don't win.

Christianity however? That took over the whole world, several times.

I'd say that's a winning strategy. And Christian leaders, like Martin Luther, wrote books about jewish power lol.
I would say if you're worried about jewish power, there are thousands of much more successful ways to go about it. England did it in 1290, for example. I'm not worried because I think Christ conquers all, and I think simple nations and simple, true Christianity will win, but if you are concerned specifically about jewish power, you're definitely not doing it right.

@houseofosborne @alex @SurStromming @magicalthinking @FRENZMagazine A military loss does not equate to ideological flaws. The only reason Germany lost is because the jews pulled strings and ganked them with tons of minions.
Furthermore, if you're going to bring up Christianity as some sort of salvation, then you have to address why so many pastors are promoting homosexual marriage, transgenderism, miscegenation, and open borders. You also have to address why so many people, over so many centuries, gladly left the church at the first opportunity.

So, Germany not planning on any of that happening was not an ideological flaw? I'd say it clearly was. Claiming that jews run the world and then seemingly intentionally provoking them would be a huge oversight. Second, you're not including the pastors the vehemently oppose gay marriage, of which those are the majority. Only in the Catholic church are they really required to support gay people, in other churches they are simply kicked out, and then those people go to gay "church".

@houseofosborne @Dagnar @alex @SurStromming @magicalthinking @FRENZMagazine Sweet baby White jesus.

Methodists, Presbyterians, Episcopal/Anglicans, Baptists, UCC, hell even the Mennonites full on love them some faggots. The Orthodox Church doesn't of course.

Non-denominational strip-mall churches are even less Christian than me, so they don't count.

You must not be around churches enough. Where I'm from, they preach openly against gay people.

@houseofosborne @alex @SurStromming @magicalthinking @Dagnar @FRENZMagazine Sure they do. Right after they speak out about women in the ministry.

lol. You're such a gay retard

Democrats are the real racist, obviously🙄

@alex alright fine you got my vote back im voting for you

@Tony @alex This guy doesn't know about Telegram pirates channels yet...

Cut yourself off from all streaming services - build/buy a NAS and stream your media from it.

@Tony @alex @Red_Hat

> 2TB NAS

Disk space is cheap and it sounds like ypu have only a sibgle disk in there.

#DataHordersAnonymous

SHHHHHHHHUUSH. DONT TELL TURBO THAT STORAGE IS CHEAP.

Anyways:
https://shucks.top/ - use this if you want to use the drives from "external" setups
https://diskprices.com/

@Tony @alex They have free spoofing number services. Only really need to use it once.

Telegram works over wifi as well.