I wouldn't say infosec is "bullshit." I'd say a lot of people in those fields are NOT developers, and they lack a true understanding of what security techniques are actually versus beneficial versus those that tick a box on a checklist (CrowdStrike was always a garbage security nightmare from the moment I saw it; and I constantly raised concerns and no one cared because "compliance.")
SHIELD certification was talked about a lot ~2012 and a lot of people in the security sector were against any type of certification, because it's just so pointless. There was a panel discussion about SHEILD form 2012, but Ruxcon pulled the video for some reason. I'd put it on catbox, but it's 950Mb.
One of the most iconic images I remember for a security conference was Travis Goodspeed's talk on packet-in-packet injection, because of the following image titled "Encapsulation."
Software is built on layers, and even security is designed in layers that are intended to create isolation as well as redundancy. The trouble is that very few people can describe, in any reasonable level of detail, everything that happens in a single HTTP request.
Modern security exploits are often a single strap in these layers. No matter how much everything else is locked in, one bad link could cause everything to come crashing out on the motorway.
Now that I don't do manual labor I have to work out and go hiking in my free time instead 🤷♀️
says they just hated Linux and they accepted the Windows CDs he made. I wasn't there.
"You Samoans are all the same. You have no faith in the basic decency of the white man's culture."
- https://the-mad-pirate-prints.teemill.com/
@ins0mniak @amerika @Tony @p @h4890 @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist I used to work in AV doing events. You could get anywhere with black shirt and a 2-way. Most of the time security passes weren't organised for us until like 30mins before doors. By which point it was too late anyway.
Dead
Fictional

People favor charismic psychopaths over sincere people, a new study suggests.
@p @amerika @skylar @ins0mniak @threalist @sj_zero @cjd @h4890 @billiam i dont know if this is an optical illusion or not but i saved it on the pictures folder anyway
- https://the-mad-pirate-prints.teemill.com/
@p @amerika @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist everyone in or seeking a position of power is acting out of malice, by definition.
@amerika @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist cooperation is a way to get things done.
power is a way to force others to do things that one wants.
another question is "beneficial" to whom? "the majority"? "oppressed minorities"?
that's how we end with conservatives/liberals/other-flavor-of-cronyism lamenting about how rigged and flawed things are until they are in power and suddenly it's democracy that need to be defended.
..it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.
The irony is that this perfectly describes every single person posting that paradox of tolerance comic on reddit.
I think about reciprocity often in the context of why human ethics don't extend to animals. I think this has a lot to do with why we put "pet" animals in a different ethical category than other animals. We have experience with pets reciprocating non-violence with us, but we have no such expectations of a cougar we cross paths with on a hike.
I don't know how you feel about homesteading as the origin of property, but certainly large numbers of libertarian/anarcho-capitalists seem to find it compelling. I don't see how under that framework for instance a beaver mixing their labor with natural resources doesn't give them private ownership over their dam and river. If there is a consciousness threshold for rights, that raises some uncomfortable questions about people with cognitive impairments / degeneration.