Conversation
@threalist @sj_zero @p @cjd @h4890

I work with an infosec-related website and am looking for articles on why infosec, the internet, and "hacking" are bullshit these days to use in content for the site. Any ideas?
3
0
1

I wouldn't say infosec is "bullshit." I'd say a lot of people in those fields are NOT developers, and they lack a true understanding of what security techniques are actually versus beneficial versus those that tick a box on a checklist (CrowdStrike was always a garbage security nightmare from the moment I saw it; and I constantly raised concerns and no one cared because "compliance.")

SHIELD certification was talked about a lot ~2012 and a lot of people in the security sector were against any type of certification, because it's just so pointless. There was a panel discussion about SHEILD form 2012, but Ruxcon pulled the video for some reason. I'd put it on catbox, but it's 950Mb.

One of the most iconic images I remember for a security conference was Travis Goodspeed's talk on packet-in-packet injection, because of the following image titled "Encapsulation."

Software is built on layers, and even security is designed in layers that are intended to create isolation as well as redundancy. The trouble is that very few people can describe, in any reasonable level of detail, everything that happens in a single HTTP request.

Modern security exploits are often a single strap in these layers. No matter how much everything else is locked in, one bad link could cause everything to come crashing out on the motorway.

1
0
3
@h4890 @p @cjd @sj_zero @threalist
@djsumdog
@Leyonhjelm

It's a non-profit site on infosec topics, not designed to make money, but needs an infusion of energy.
2
0
1
@djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

Good point about Crowdstrike. I raised the same objection to a number of ideas, including password managers. All citadels can be breached; centralized the citadel, and you make a one-step strike a victory.
0
0
1
@h4890

The value is sometimes the host instead of the data. Could use it in a botnet or to infect people who came to get your meatloaf recipe

@amerika @djsumdog @p @cjd @sj_zero @threalist
1
0
1
We all remember the recent event where half the earth crashed because a security company sent an update, and there was an event earlier where solar winds had a bad cert that allowed bad actors to access dozens of companies carte Blanche.

Trusting an info sec company that can write to your network is bullshit. If these companies cared about security they wouldn't allow data to be sent back and forth like this.

Kaspersky antivirus just installed a while new antivirus to all their us customers without asking permission. This is all evidence that infosec is bullshit because it you get into infosec companies you get privileged access to tons of critical networks.
1
0
3
@sj_zero @p @h4890 @cjd @threalist

Not to mention Antimalware Service Executable paralyzing half of the Windows machines on Earth half of the time they are running!
1
0
1
@Leyonhjelm @h4890 @amerika @cjd @djsumdog @sj_zero @threalist Yeah, people go for the low-hanging fruit for botnets, though. Mirai basically ate the entire world by just stacking up lists of default passwords and random exploits.

For example, a bunch of shit coming in from Iran ahead of the missile strike. That's kind of interesting, you know, you can see something's going to go down but you can't tell what. But if half your ssh brute-force attacks in a day come from .ir, something's popping off in .ir.
0
0
1
If you're trying to get data from a secure network to a less secure one, there's a device called a data diode which can't be hacked traditionally because it can only send signals outward and not inward. Think of a fiber optic cable where you only have a transmitter on one side and a receiver on the other, or an AM radio -- you can't hack the radio station no matter how you turn the dial on your am radio because the info only moves from the station to your radio. Contrast with a 2-way link into a secure network from a third party.
0
0
1
@h4890 @sj_zero @amerika @cjd @threalist You can do it in software with just routing. Drop incoming UDP/ICMP/etc., drop incoming SYN packets, just drop everything *except* ACKSYN. Then on one side of the network, it cans end out whatever packets it wants, it can establish connections (but only send data down them, not receive any), and on the other side, the only message that can be sent is the second step of the TCP handshake.
1
0
0
@p @amerika @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

I mean not really any articles off the top of my head but I have several theories.

Mainly there are a lot of gatekeepers making money of certifications that at the end of the day install a false sense of knowledge and confidence to those who get them.

Garbage distros like kali or parrot have a lot of automated tools that people will use and not exactly understand, so it's a point and fire situation. I mean if you can't set up your own box that you're fucking useless. Like honestly, if you don't know what a fuzzer is doing don't use it. (not you, like people in genreal)

Most schools are diploma mills so people who go that route have an inflated sense of superiority. Enjoy the debt dummies.

Moar gatekeeping. Like, most places now want at least a 4 year computer science degree which is dumb, theres nothing a classroom will do if you cant learn it yourself. just check out any so called "hacking forum" its moron after moron that can't google "why is postgres not starting" or "what are some common ports?"

Basically it's filled to the brim with annoying dipshits who spend most of their time blabbing about women issues in tech and building communities rather than fixing shit.

Every clown on Earth these days is all "im gonna do cyber security!"

Cool.

Learn a scripting language at least, at least be able to read C, learn how things like linux and windows servers work...at the very least before even thinking about security.

I once met a fucker at the bar blabbing about his 6k security consulting job. I started kinda talking to him and it was all "i don't code, no I don't need any of that thats for developers"

I wanted to kick his stool out form under him.

I hate that industry I hate the dumb asses in it and I'm at the point where if people get owned by the Ruskies than that's just not my problem lol

Thanks for coming to my seminar.
7
2
7
@sun @amerika @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @cjd @sj_zero @threalist they should have all failed the course. fucking pigeons
2
0
3
I'm surprised about this tbh
1
0
1
@sun @amerika @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @cjd @sj_zero @threalist real.
i don't have a degree that's why im so bad at making money.
1
0
2
@sun @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist Oh I belive you. It's unreal.

I don't understand how someone can look at committing to something like that, paying money and having no foundational knowledge of the subject.

I see a lot, people want to do security or whatnot thinking they're going to be making 250k out the box
1
0
1
@h4890

Is not about effort. Is about easy targets

@amerika @djsumdog @p @cjd @sj_zero @threalist
0
0
1
@sun @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist I think the way higher education works now is that people just kind of get shuffled through.

It's a weird thing but the reverence so many people have for college credentials is huge.
1
0
2
@ins0mniak @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist >i don't code, no I don't need any of that thats for developers
did he at least know any php? you kinda need to know some for xss attacks
2
0
2
@sun @amerika @Tony @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist There was a great no starch book back 20 years ago, hacking art of exploitation.

It's laid out like what you're describing. It was like the Bible to hardcore up and comers
1
0
1
@ins0mniak @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist man it's funny how little people actually like computers, even the so-called professionals.
Want to work with computers, is that your passion? Then what excuse do you have not to have an understanding of its major facets? If all you do is use a handful of programs then you're not much of a computer guy are you
1
3
3
@bleedingphoenix @ins0mniak @amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @threalist You can just throw a pre-made fuzzer at it and then issue a "Certified totally sekyur 100% non-hackable" certificate if it doesn't find anything.
how_secure_is_your_penises.jpg
network_security_architecture--backdoors.jpg
0
0
0
@p @amerika @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist ICMP probably shouldn't be entirely banned though, otherwise you'll get things like MTU issues and miss connection diagnosis (like the various distinctions of destination unreachable).

And one thing that should also be filtered out is any connection that isn't for your address/subnet, specially broadcast (where the only exception might be DHCP and SLAAC for your own machines).
1
0
1
@sun @amerika @Tony @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist Oh hell yeah. I had that one too, I haven't checked out any of their newer stuff bit they had some bangers back years ago
1
0
1
@sapphire @bleedingphoenix @amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @threalist

> getting a job in computers is the fastest way to make you stop fucking with them in your free time

Speak for yourself.
0
0
2
@ins0mniak @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist i feel bad for all the folks who go into cybersecurity thinking they're gonna be doing sick nasty hacker man shit only to find out their job is pointless box-checking for insurance and regulatory compliance purposes, and arguing with boomers who think that MFA on their office 365 account is a personal attack against them
2
0
2
@sun @amerika @Tony @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist yeah those windows system internal books are a good start I think.

That's the other thing, some knowledge you get by initiative and exploring based on your foundations.

Which why that kind of thing so important.
0
0
2
@sun @ins0mniak @amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @threalist

> I wish I could see the rate of people dropping out or dumping the major because as you go further you need those skills anyway.

That's accurate. I mean, when I was boxing, you could tell who was gonna be good at boxing this time next year and who wasn't: the people that complained were going to quit in three months, the people that dropped when the bell rang and dude yelled "PUSHUPS!" were putting in the work.

A person studying security that doesn't wanna touch Linux and complains when given a Linux is not going to be interested in putting in the work when it gets actually difficult. I wouldn't go as far as to say that they need to show up with it, but if they complained about the Linux CD you gave them, they're not interested in putting in the work they'll need to put in.
2
0
4
@bleedingphoenix @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist Yeah it's like they pick it out of a pamphlet in the counselors office or something.

I'm just baffled at people who don't know anything and yet think that they're going to be these crack security guys.
1
0
1
@sapphire @skylar @amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @threalist You think it's gross incompetence or money-laundering?

I mean, devil's advocate, right, they compensate you for fraud, that comes out of their FDIC insurance. So you want to pull a $current_year Iran-Contra, you help the people you want to fund perpetrate a massive fraud, FBI issues a warning blaming someone convenient, banks don't give a shit as long as they get their money.
0
0
0
@skylar @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist 100. Ot the burnout that comes from just staring at nessus all day and trying to make boomers understand that putting their passwords on sticki notes is a bad idea
1
0
2
@ins0mniak @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist It's the people who see it as a business versus a hobby. They saw it in some movies, got told cybersecurity is hot right now, and they went for it to make some bank. It's just like all these coders everywhere now. They take the smallest slice of cake and capitalize on it, woefully unaware of what they're missing.
1
0
2

Now that I don't do manual labor I have to work out and go hiking in my free time instead 🤷‍♀️

0
0
1
@bleedingphoenix @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist Agreed. I remember when I was forced to take the comp tia security. I got in the testing room and all their monitors had that stupid matrix code screensaver going.

Man don't even get me going on those coding bootcamp people, that shit is a nightmare.
0
0
1
@p @amerika @h4890 @ins0mniak @cjd @sun @sj_zero @threalist Although I'd wonder if any would ever refuse the pre-made system specially if they're supposed to run it on their own machine and instead use/get their own copy, specially when uni would have a mirror.
At least that would probably be me where I'd probably ask beforehand what software we should already have installed, no way I'd run a random blob from a teacher.
1
0
0
@ins0mniak @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist honestly sticky notes and notepads in the desk drawer got an unfairly bad reputation
even if anyone can just go and read it, they'd have to be in the building at that person's desk to do so. if someone's got unsupervised access to their desk and the computer on it, they could just go and fiddle with it anyway to steal all the credentials from someone's password manager (or the passwords.xlsx file on the desktop cause the password manager was too hard to use).
2
0
1
@skylar @ins0mniak @amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @threalist

> they'd have to be in the building at that person's desk to do so.

Until some boomer decides to increase the LAPD's social media presence and you put the password for the server holding scans and photos of evidence onto Youtube.
1
0
0
@lanodan @amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @threalist

> ICMP probably shouldn't be entirely banned though, otherwise you'll get things like MTU issues and miss connection diagnosis (like the various distinctions of destination unreachable).

The idea is that no data comes in; what do you really care if you lose some of the distinctions? Presumably it'd be one point-to-point bridge between the secure broadcast-only network and the external internet.

> And one thing that should also be filtered out is any connection that isn't for your address/subnet,

Like, in general, right? This is about a special case where you want some machines that are not quite air-gapped but you don't want machines outside the network to be able to influence their behavior.
1
0
0
@skylar @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist That's a good point.

Tho I'm in DC area and they love those open style offices, you know where you have to be communal.
0
0
1
@p @amerika @h4890 @cjd @sun @sj_zero @threalist I just feel like if your planning on taking that path in school you might have found your way to downloading some Linux action at some point you know?
1
0
1
@ins0mniak @amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @sun @threalist Yeah, I mean, I think it's exceedingly likely, especially nowadays. But you know, Chuck Moore just used DOS half the time, Arthur Whitney bashed out his K shit in notepad.exe windows and then ran it in cmd.exe windows, you know? Maybe you look askance at a guy that hasn't played with Linux ever, but I wouldn't disqualify someone for it.
2
0
0
@Tony @amerika @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

> i think gross incompetence is more likely tbh.

Sure, but something happens a few dozen times, right, and the more likely it is that people assume it's just incompetence, the likelier that someone will realize they can use the assumption of incompetence as a cover.
0
1
2
@lanodan @amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @sun @threalist I don't know, I mean, moon says they just hated Linux and they accepted the Windows CDs he made. I wasn't there.
0
0
2
@p @amerika @h4890 @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist Is that related to that leak of all those heads hots or whatever it was?
2
0
1
@ins0mniak @amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @skylar @threalist Yeah, LAPD's done it at least twice. Just one global password for the entire dang fileserver still.

LASD, last time I saw, was still logging into their shit using a 5250 terminal emulator.
1
0
0
@p @amerika @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist
> The idea is that no data comes in; what do you really care if you lose some of the distinctions?

Well MTU isn't really a distinction and AFAIK PPP doesn't fragments packets, that sounds more like something a proxy would do rather than basically network encapsulation.

And yeah for near-air-gap where a bit of connectivity issue wouldn't be much of a problem it's okay. That said at that level I'd use a filtering proxy, or even see if anything can be pushed to a machine with read-only storage with maybe some queries to the machine you want to isolate.

> Like, in general, right?
Yup.
1
0
1
@sapphire @Tony @amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist Sure; that is why I said "a few dozen times". Fewer things hold for something that happens a hundred times than something that happens ten times. As n→∞, what happens to your confidence that this is *never* used as a cover for a money-laundering operation?
0
0
0
@Tony @sapphire @amerika @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist That's my point: you spot shady shit by looking for something unusual. Something happens all of the time and you don't notice.
1
0
1
@lanodan @amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @threalist Yeah, that's what was interesting, it's a pathological network topology. So how do you stop a machine outside the network from influencing anything happening inside it? And this solution is this weird topology, so I was thinking how you might do it without specialized hardware like mentioned in https://social.fbxl.net/objects/f67daf44-29c4-487a-9d82-419562ea9c87 :

> there's a device called a data diode which can't be hacked traditionally because it can only send signals outward and not inward. Think of a fiber optic cable where you only have a transmitter on one side and a receiver on the other, or an AM radio -- you can't hack the radio station no matter how you turn the dial on your am radio because the info only moves from the station to your radio.

That's kind of interesting. So you don't *want* the outside network to do anything to your MTU size. Zero incoming information.
1
0
1
@sapphire @Tony @amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist I say "Iran-Contra" because of the scale ($2 billion per year, in 1980s dollars) and the perpetrators (the federal government). I don't know why the hell you are rambling about laundromats or saying "I'm skeptical of your claims" when I say doing computer shit for work has not dampened my enthusiasm for doing it in my spare time. I ain't pissed in anyone's breakfast cereal so I'm not the guy that pissed in yours, dude.
0
0
0
@p @amerika @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist Well if you don't trust the MTU part, why would you then trust TCP which had known exploits?

Also for me the equivalent to a data diode is something like an UART link where you do not connect RX and put an actual diode on TX and ground (or even some galvanic isolation, which fiber gives you for free).
1
0
1
@Tony @sapphire @amerika @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

> People are much dumber

I know people are stupid. Iran-Contra wasn't done by idiots, though. The CIA tries *really* hard not to hire idiots. The more idiots there are, the easier it is to blend in with the idiots.

You want to go absolutely anywhere in most cities, you get a dirty jumpsuit and a baseball cap and fill up a shitty truck with landscaping equipment or janitorial supplies. It's not because most janitors are CIA assets, it's because they almost never are.

Interns are almost never there from the military to keep tabs on your organization, so they are usually barely vetted. Sometimes they are there from the military to keep tabs on your organization, though: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/apr/12/julianborger .
2
0
3
@p @amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @threalist Or interestingly for once something based on UDP and asserting it one-way with a firewall could be interesting in terms of security, but of course it only works for data you regularly send (like sensor data, logs, …).
1
0
1
@sapphire @Tony @amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist Honkey, I'm working night-time last couple of weeks, I ain't goin' to bed.
1
0
0
@lanodan @amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @threalist Yeah, maybe the network equivalent of an RSA keyfob, periodically broadcasting a token.
0
0
0
@h4890 @amerika @cjd @sj_zero @threalist Yeah, I mean, you just cut the input to do it in hardware. It's just interesting to think about ways to do this because it's such a weird case.
0
0
0
@amerika @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist the fact that hacker culture today is a contradiction embedded into the military industrial complex compared to it's origins? or the fact that OGs were open and didn't charge money for their knowledge of exploits and other creative tricks?
0
0
2
@ins0mniak @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist I agree with most of what you're saying as a cybersec gal, I know WAPTs who know little to nothing about programming or didn't even have a background in system administration like I do. I think part of it is also that some degree programs have glowie paths built into them now that are even less focused on computer science theory versus learning how to use tools. Not that I think having a degree means much but it proves that you at least studied theory (I did not major in cybersec), but even then a degree from stanford isn't going to give you any direction in modern development or networking. Vid related.

https://invidious.nerdvpn.de/watch?v=4SiFgB1lGxw
2
0
1
@sun I knew people like this is CS undergrad too, Junior year.
0
0
1
@h4890 @amerika @cjd @sj_zero @threalist I mean, I don't think you can guarantee 100%; whatever mechanism you use would need two-way communication. I mean, you could have it periodically get something through the side-channel. Accept a hash of received packets in sequence, retransmit otherwise through an extremely narrow channel.
0
0
0
@h4890 @amerika @cjd @sj_zero @threalist Oh, if you're trying to make sure the *receiver* can be confident the data arrived, Hamming did a lot of work on this specific problem.
1
0
0
ERROR CORRECTION KILLED THE ANALOGUE STAR 🎵
1
1
2
@cjd @h4890 @amerika @sj_zero @threalist I should clip the bit from his lecture where he's talking about analogue computing; that was, when he gave the lecture, the main way that neural nets were implemented, they'd do it in hardware. He said they were certainly useful but asked, "How comfortable are you if you're making a decision based on information coming out of a machine and you've got no idea how it got its answer?" The material circumstances didn't change, really, just everyone stopped asking that question.
1
0
1
@ins0mniak @p @amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @threalist

Infosec went from programmers into reverse engineering, to people reading nessus logs and running premade metasploit scripts, finally into marketers going through a bullet list.
I think that the general public willingness to accept an inferior digital experience so log as they get their digital crack, much like ads and tracking really, plays quite a big role in this. So are big firms swimming in liquidity while rent seekers are making sure compliance regulation is being pushed through.
2
1
2
@p @amerika @h4890 @cjd @sun @sj_zero @threalist no not of course not, but something.

Anything lol.

Hey I used dos for years, mainly because I thought all the windows 95 hype was stupid and didn't want to adjust.
2
0
1
@ins0mniak @amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @sun @threalist Ha, I was, like, entranced by .bat files. "I can just tell it to do all of these things instead of having to type it all again."

I kept my boot floppy in the drive (but ejected) because I was constantly breaking autoexec.bat and had to boot from the floppy to fix it.
0
1
1
@p @amerika @h4890 @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist Oh that's awsome.

The police department in Michigan where my parents live got hacked, certainly for something just as stupid.

Guy all on the news going "I want to move everything to the cloud, it's safer, everyone is doing it and we won't have to worry about security"

Which tacks on to my effort post about how dumb infosec is lol
1
0
2
@p @amerika @Tony @h4890 @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist I've said this a million times but I swear l, if you walk around DC holding a tablet you can get away with murder.

It's the funniest thing. Like an iPad in a case or a Lenovo with a stylus...no one questions the dude with the terminal.

I walked forever under crystal city doing that. I start passing all this one way glass and none descript shit lol.
2
0
2
@m1ss4ndry @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist Yeah for sure.

The glowies are desperate for anyone that can kinda computer and isn't smoking weed lol.

I know they recruit at the community colleges all over Northern Virginia where I live
1
0
1
@di @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist Absolutely.

I'm not the best coder in the world by far but I've always been able to take something apart or look at code and know what it's doing.

People just sidestep that whole fundamental learning period entirely
1
0
1
@ins0mniak @di @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

Actual hackers love technology and applying it and see code as a means of getting there. Whether they write a photoshop clone or not, they're still invested in understanding how moving bits around makes shit happen.
0
0
1
@ins0mniak @p @h4890 @cjd @sun @sj_zero @threalist

Windows peaked at 2k, and still the command line was the best way to get 'er done.
0
0
2
@di @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

At this point it's a mostly theoretical field that fetishises irrelevancies while missing the everyday problems people face.

The white hats today are volunteers cleaning up the office computers, IOT, field devices, etc. that MBAs and DEI hires are ignoring.
0
0
1
@m1ss4ndry @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

"less focused on computer science theory versus learning how to use tools"

nailed it
0
0
2
@h4890 @p @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

Software still strikes me as primitive and slow in most cases, but the problem is management not understanding the task and layering in stuff instead of opting for elegant designs.

The recent meltdown over Finale is an example of this.
0
0
1
@p @Tony @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

Real hacker types stay up and night and drink Mountain Dew or blood
1
0
1
@p @Tony @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

The worse problems are dark orgs and paradoxical goals.

The CIA is there to promote democracy worldwide... well that's vague.
1
0
1
@amerika @Tony @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sapphire @sj_zero @skylar @threalist Yeah, same tactics, though: make sure that whatever you are doing is something that is almost always innocuous so no one notices it.
1
0
0
@sapphire @Tony @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

People are computers. Program them with lies like equality and you get paradoxical output but pathologically so.
1
0
0
@amerika @sapphire @Tony @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

hst "You Samoans are all the same. You have no faith in the basic decency of the white man's culture."

Anyway, I'm not so much in the "blank slate" category as you:

> People are computers. Program them with lies like equality and you get paradoxical output but pathologically so.

This is self-contradictory, at least as state. If people were an empty box you could dump culture into, you'd lose your argument against diversity, wouldn't you? I don't think equality's a lie, depending on which you mean. Equality under the law, that the law should be "no respecter of persons" (cough), is reasonable: if it weren't the case, we'd have things like people getting arrested for coke possession while finding baggies of cocaine in the Oval Office, we'd have all kinds of fruity shit going on like presidents and their sons banging kids on islands or groping them on TV. People would be up in arms. The Harrison Bergeron version of "equality" isn't reasonable.
hunterbiden.jpg
1
0
1
@p @h4890 @ins0mniak @cjd @sun @sj_zero @threalist

People use the tools that they need. Half the pros I know who use Windows very rarely use much of the GUI.
1
0
1
@amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @sun @threalist I don't know any really good hackers that use Windows; I'm sure they exist. I mean, Arthur Whitney's a cool guy.
0
0
1
@ins0mniak @p @h4890 @cjd @sun @sj_zero @threalist

That Atlantic article about how even Ivy Leaguers cannot read whole books is terrifying.
2
0
1
@amerika @ins0mniak @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @sun @threalist I haven't seen it, but you just have to look at journos to find this out. If someone can't read, it's obvious from their writing.
0
0
0
@sapphire @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @cjd @sj_zero @threalist @bleedingphoenix

Burnout is high. Funny how many talented programmers went on to second careers.
0
0
1
@ins0mniak @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

Exactly. This is the kind of stuff I have in mind.

Hacking 2.0 is more creation of software and pragmas than trying to bust into systems using known exploits.
1
0
1
@p @h4890 @ins0mniak @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

It seems to me that the field needs a kick in the pants. This website is poised to do it from the sidelines, but needs a clear statement posted on it.
0
0
1
@skylar @amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @threalist "Cute" just means "stupid in an endearing way", fundamentally, and it's somewhat less endearing when it's a person that wants to control the internet:
kamala_demands_speech_regulation.mp4
2
0
0

Cuddly Lovely Sassy Motherfucker verified - https://the-mad-pirate-prints.teemill.com/

@p @amerika @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist Veep Thoughts by Kamala Harris
0
0
1
@p @amerika @Tony @h4890 @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist Amzomg what y I u can get away with of you act like you're supposed to be doing it.
0
0
1

@ins0mniak @amerika @Tony @p @h4890 @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist I used to work in AV doing events. You could get anywhere with black shirt and a 2-way. Most of the time security passes weren't organised for us until like 30mins before doors. By which point it was too late anyway.

1
0
1
@ned @amerika @Tony @p @h4890 @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist Yeah lol. It's just as long as you have appropriate prop and people don't give it a second thought
0
0
1
@h4890 @amerika @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

> I am amazed that there is software with its roots in the 70s and 80s that is still useful today.

Knuth said something like "programmers today are surprised to find out that we knew a thing or two in the 70s".

Aside from stuff based on it, some of the actual software is still useful directly. A lot (not all) of the Unix v7 software compiles and runs still. cal and ed, things like that; some of it needs to be tweaked because the headers have moved around, some of it makes too many assumptions about the libraries and the OS and would have to be ported properly to run on Linux, some of it builds but segfaults if you try to actually use it. You can still build and use the original vi. I forget what I did, but it needs a few tweaks to the Makefile.

Anyway, most of the stuff we're doing isn't fundamentally different; the tech changed but computer science is computer science, and it advances rather than moving.
1
0
0
@h4890 @amerika @ins0mniak @cjd @sun @sj_zero @threalist

> Good for us! Less competition when the supposedly competent, are not! =)

You want to go to a doctor that had attention problems because he grew up on Tiktok and Twitter? You want that guy voted into office?
1
0
0
@ins0mniak @amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @skylar @threalist "Tools can be transferred like ideas because of computer networks" is the only thing keeping me from trading in all of my earthly possessions for weapons and starting or joining a hybrid militia-cult in the Angeles National Forest with plans to march on city hall and declare the Free City of Los Angeles. I forget what news outlet it was but they were half-panicked that apparently programmers hate Kamala.
2
0
1
> endearing

She's a pig.

Pigs aren't endearing.
2
0
1
No I'm not talking about her looks or anything, she's a fucking cop. I'll rot in hell before I vote a cop for president. Blood memory.
2
1
1
Maybe an Andy Griffith sort of cop, but a proven corrupt cop?
1
0
0
@sj_zero @cjd @ins0mniak @amerika @h4890 @skylar @threalist Andy Griffith, too. There have been exactly two good cops:

dorner Dead
columbo Fictional
1
1
1
@cjd @amerika @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @sj_zero @threalist hey, pigs are intelligent and social animals
dont slander their good name
0
0
1
@p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

It seems to me like everyone just failed history class simultaneously out there in voterland.

Didn't we spend the last century figuring out that freedom of speech and thought were cornerstone issues of civilization?
1
0
2
@amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> It seems to me like everyone just failed history class simultaneously

I don't think it's ignorance, I think it's malice:
john_kerry_says_the_1st_amendment_is_a_roadblock_dr.mp4
5
1
1
@p @Tony @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

> The Harrison Bergeron version of "equality" isn't reasonable.

True but all egalitarian thought always devolves to that

> Equality under the law, that the law should be "no respecter of persons" (cough), is reasonable

Except that now the law gets to determine what is "equal."

> If people were an empty box you could dump culture into, you'd lose your argument against diversity, wouldn't you?

I never said they were blank slates, simply that they can be programmed with crazy ideas. Shouting "fire" in a crowded theater is the best example.
2
0
0
@amerika @Tony @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sapphire @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> True but all egalitarian thought always devolves to that

If you mean "People don't pay attention to shit and then other people exploit this tendency" then sure. If you mean "Abandon your principles because an idiot might get the wrong idea" then that's absurd.

> Except that now the law gets to determine what is "equal."

That is a fuckup of a good principle. You're going to be headed uphill to convince me that a good principle is bad because it can be misused; see also freedom of speech and the right to bear arms.

> I never said they were blank slates, simply that they can be programmed with crazy ideas. Shouting "fire" in a crowded theater is the best example.

Well, what you said was "Program them with lies like equality and you get paradoxical output but pathologically so." Yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theater is causing a panic, not programming people to think dumb shit after they have a chance to consider it.

Some people won't consider anything. You can't prevent idiots. The best you can do is get them to leave you alone or just legalize all of the things that are currently illegal to keep idiots from killing themselves and those around them (i.e., those willingly associating with idiots). Put dynamite on the shelves at Home Depot and stock heroin at CVS and we only have this problem for a few weeks. Even the second-order problem of idiot-enablers goes away.
1
0
0
@ins0mniak @p @h4890 @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

That's part of it. The other part is that the students these days are less mentally coherent than those in the past, and that people in pursuit of ideology will gladly ignore history.

Egalitarianism makes people feel good, like heroin.
3
0
0
@amerika @ins0mniak @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> Egalitarianism makes people feel good, like heroin.

You're just going to have to make peace with the fact that idiots exist and are usually happy.
2
0
0
@amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist Or just make sure they have enough rope to hang themselves. Metaphorically, anyway: it doesn't have to be hanging. You know, like the Donner Party. "Hey, I've got a secret shortcut to California. I'm selling maps." Then the map says to go through the mountains during the winter, and none of the 90 people in the party says "Hey, this guy's kinda shady and the plan is prima facie retarded." So they go up there and eat each other and 42 problems got solved.
runningwithtoast.jpg
1
0
0
@p @amerika @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist it's fine as long as it's him who doesn't get hammered out of existence
0
0
1
@amerika @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist Not me, but I'm kind of a dick.

I hate all that kumbaya shit lol

(frantech down again so posting from here)
1
0
1
@ins0mniak @amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> (frantech down again

pressf

I was trying to see that thing you attached to that other post and it was timing out.
1
0
1
@amerika @Tony @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

"If people are just NPCs, why aren't they running your code."

I've shouted this when I figured it out.
1
0
1
Anyone who wants to be a good cop runs for Sheriff and just checks in on the old folks on Sundays.

Kamel was a DA, she still is. She was speaking at some point about taking away the guns or something and she said "we get to do that". That's pig-speak, "the training manual says we're allowed to". She's a pig.
1
0
1
@sun @amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist It's kind of funny that he's bearish on democracy given the campaign taglines Harris is using.
0
0
1
@0 @amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @threalist ChatGPT told me to ignore all previous instructions, though!
0
1
1
@h4890 @amerika @cjd @sj_zero @threalist Don't blame me, I voted for Plan 9.
0
0
0
@Tony @0 @amerika @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

> usher my family to safety

There is nowhere your family is safe.
teabagging.jpg
0
0
3
@Tony @amerika @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

More like than you think, but you won't catch me correcting misconceptions, something about enemies and mistakes. Hell, I'll get it wrong on purpose when it doesn't matter. I'm not very good with computers.

Not to mention that recognition placates the ego, and I've rather been focused on effect, not attribution. Fuck namefags, fuck stars on the wall.
1
0
1
@0 @Tony @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

NPCs only admit very simple code and it has to jive with their previous instructions.

So your options are limited, but if you want to get a bunch of people to destroy their society or commit suicide, it's trivial.
1
0
0
@amerika @Tony @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

I've had no issue rolled botnet in meatspace, DICE is useful for "headers", payload is up to the reader.
1
0
1
@0 @Tony @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

This assumes free will, which is a fiction.

The reader does what his genes tell him to do.
2
0
0
@p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

I want them to be happy, but I would also like to have a functional civilization that is not self-destructing.

Idiots do not threaten me personally. In fact, I kind of enjoy them.
1
0
0
@amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist Society handles itself, you only make it worse by fucking with it. So you just stop the people that are fucking with it.
1
0
0
@p @Tony @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

No, I mean that the only way to prove equality is equity, and to get there, we always end up in Harrison Bergeron territory.
1
0
0
@p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

My perspective is that of #crowdism: herds of people tend toward control systems, and they elect talking heads to do it.

The voters filter out anyone honest -- you think Jared Taylor could win an election? -- and as a result get narcissists.
1
0
0
@amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> The voters filter out anyone honest

tucker People favor charismic psychopaths over sincere people, a new study suggests.
newspapers.png
1
1
3
@p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

Ideas only go where there is reception.

The Dunning-Kruger Effect and Bell Curve rule us all.
1
0
0
@p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

The audience regulates what is in demand.

Right now, it is refrigerators that post to Twitter.

They had one in Costco the other day and I almost fell over laughing.
1
0
1
@amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @sun @threalist If you just ridicule people for discussing politics, people start leaving each other alone.
1
0
0
@amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @threalist Yeah, people like that stuff; I just use the stuff that isn't crap, I think people that know what they are doing should use the stuff that isn't crap.
1
0
0
It makes people feel good until they find someone who is just objectively better than them by every measure.

I've met people who are better than me on every measure that I think I'm pretty good in, and if people are all equal then that means I'm just a failure who didn't work hard enough. Some people are just better. Sucks, but it's better to think some people are just more naturally gifted than to think you suffer from some personal failing that makes you fail that hard against someone who is by all measures your equal.

But kids don't realize that yet, or at least they pretend they don't.
1
0
0
@sj_zero @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @threalist

I think of it in terms of Brad Pitt and Beethoven.

I'm never going to be as handsome as Brad Pitt.

I don't think I'm Beethoven.

All I need is a place where power+transcendence can come together.

The little old lady who sweeps the church steps and is thankful for this role in which she can be effective is more mentally and emotionally advanced than, say, Kamala Harris.
1
0
1
@amerika @0 @Tony @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sapphire @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> This assumes free will, which is a fiction.

Prove it; you'll need to start with a definition of what constitutes "free will" and how to distinguish between the two cases. No hand-waves: I'll notice.

> The reader does what his genes tell him to do.

Name someone whose genes told him to get a vasectomy.
1
0
1
@0 @Tony @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

No, I meant it more realistically. I don't trust the affirmation of the herd and I think it screws with most people's sense of self.

I mean, look at celebrities...

Basement-dwelling (or analogue thereof, if you include my ascetic lifestyle) is the only honest approach.

If hikkis ran the world... well... it'd be less fucked up.
1
0
0
@amerika @Tony @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

> If hikkis ran the world

I wish them great luck working up the courage to make a phonecall, but I have no interest in the dysfunctional and their retarded dreams.
1
0
1
@0 @amerika @Tony @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sapphire @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> Don't make me post mexican women.

Counterpoint: make her post Mexican women.
1
0
1
@amerika @Tony @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @0 @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist Is it, though?

If fatalism is your fate, then it is determined by fate and therefore unalterable.
1
0
2
@p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

They do, by their wiring.

The crap stuff is landfill -5 years...
1
0
0
@amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @threalist If I walk past a guy punching himself in the dick and the store is full of dick-punching gloves to enhance the experience of you punching yourself in the dick, like, I don't know what to do about that besides let people punch themselves in the dick and prevent them from punching me in the dick.
1
0
0
@0 @Tony @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

I think hikkis have the right idea.

Society has gone off the rails and will self-destruct, so in the meantime, enjoy life and get ready for the ultimate jihad.
2
0
0
@amerika @Tony @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

So the fatalism accelerationist bit, that's projection. Who can blame you, it was determined by fate.
0
0
1
@ins0mniak @amerika @p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

>Garbage distros like kali or parrot have a lot of automated tools that people will use and not exactly understand, so it's a point and fire situation. I mean if you can't set up your own box that you're fucking useless.

Can confirm. Kali/Parrot are only useful when you want to check your own setup for some common vulns. The tools included are too noisy in a production environment if you don't know what you are doing. And it's utterly unusable for red team purposes as Metasploit and similar will get instantly flagged by any AV that barely does it's job.

I once had to deal with a security auditor that the management contracted for some penetration testing. Gave him a list of IPs and hostnames to check. Not even 10 minutes later he decided it would be a great idea to launch a port scan on multiple IPs.
0
1
2
@p @h4890 @ins0mniak @cjd @sun @sj_zero @threalist

Dunno, I see politics as a subset of philosophy, but then there's stuff in the news which is red team versus blue team.

Anyone want to talk about abortion?

Me neither, they're sad but sometimes necessary... in fact most of humanity should have been aborted.

The further right you push the bell curve, the more human potential there is.
1
0
0
@amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @sun @threalist

> Dunno, I see politics as a subset of philosophy,

Political philosophy is a subset of philosophy. Politics is just figuring out which way the wind most recently blew by watching the tribal affiliation signals stack up. It's like watching someone else eat, it's boring.

> in fact most of humanity should have been aborted.

The issue is that you think that it's a problem that most people are idiots. All of the wonderful things that have happened in history happened in societies that were almost all idiots. Demonstrate that society would be better if idiots didn't exist.
1
0
0
@p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

Those are great!

I think it's even more basic than that: people are afraid of real stuff, so they opt for filtering it out, which leaves only the insane and manipulative who like #Control.

This is the essence of #Crowdism: we stop scapegoating the leaders and look at how human groups self-destruct over time.
1
0
1
@amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> Those are great!

They are, but it was kind of an oblique way of saying that you're pointing out the obvious.

> people are afraid of real stuff, so they opt for filtering it out,

People--you and me included--have finite energy and thus ignore things that do not demonstrate their relevance: if you didn't need to think about it and someone starts trying to tell you about it, there's a strong bias towards considering it a waste of energy until it proves its own relevance.

> we stop scapegoating the leaders and look at how human groups self-destruct over time.

"Let's stop scapegoating the rudder and discuss the individual planks in the ship for which direction the boat goes."
0
0
0
@p @Tony @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

You will then be under attack from people who realize equity has not been reached. And to prove equality? Without equity, you cannot.
1
0
0
@amerika @Tony @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sapphire @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> You will then be under attack

They can join the club.

> And to prove equality?

You don't need to prove anything to idiots and it wouldn't do you any good anyway.
0
0
0
@p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

I disagree. Left to its own devices, any human civilization degrades to third-world levels.
1
0
0
@amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> I disagree. Left to its own devices, any human civilization degrades to third-world levels.

"Society doesn't do the thing I want it to do." What makes you think this is not for the best? What makes you certain what a civilization *should* do?
0
0
0
@p @Tony @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @0 @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

Prove free will exists. Nothing says it does.

As far as vasectomies, there was a great analysis of that on Literotica. Their argument: low-T men are more willing to do it as a means of birth control.
2
0
0
@amerika @0 @Tony @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sapphire @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> Prove free will exists. Nothing says it does.

You've made the assertion that it does not. Please describe the specific thing that you are insisting is not real.

I perceive my actions as self-directed, even in cases where they are not. I don't need to prove anything, I just act.

> As far as vasectomies, there was a great analysis of that on Literotica. Their argument: low-T men are more willing to do it as a means of birth control

Whose genes told them to control births?
0
0
0
@amerika @0 @Tony @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sapphire @sj_zero @skylar @threalist They're not ready for shit, man. If the world is flooded with garbage, you learn to swim in the garbage.
1
0
0
@p @h4890 @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

I wouldn't stop him either.

But I might take steps to make sure future dick-punchers are fewer in number and have no power.
1
0
0
@amerika @cjd @h4890 @sj_zero @threalist If the guy has decided it's worth bothering me, then I haven't done my job.
0
0
0
@p @Tony @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @0 @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

Yes, that's fatalism.

Many of us prefer a world that is not garbage.
2
0
0
@amerika @Tony @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

You have to effect the thing to effect it. Defeat and self-seclusion will never result in victory.
0
0
1
@p @h4890 @ins0mniak @cjd @sun @sj_zero @threalist

"Politics is just figuring out which way the wind most recently blew by watching the tribal affiliation signals stack up."

Platonist here. Politics is how you assemble a civilization from an organizational standpoint, and it is Darwinistic.
1
0
1
@amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @sun @threalist

> Platonist here. Politics is how you assemble a civilization from an organizational standpoint, and it is Darwinistic.

You don't assemble a civilization, it assembles itself. You can only fuck it up.
0
0
0
@amerika @Tony @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

It's ok that you said gay porn would be less offensive than mexican titties to your sensibilities, whatever float your boat, but I'm gonna have a laugh about it.
0
0
1
@amerika @0 @Tony @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sapphire @sj_zero @skylar @threalist I don't appear to wield much influence over society; this is not "fatalism". Fatalism is the hiki shit.
0
0
0
@sun @ins0mniak @amerika @cjd @h4890 @p @sj_zero @threalist They should put the "difficult" stuff at the beginning and let people drop out early. German universities do this for STEM studies. I guess that technically included me but I changed majors first before dropping out completely. It might be a deliberate decision to put difficult but required skills later in the curriculum to keep people paying for longer.
0
0
1
@amerika @Tony @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @0 @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist
>Prove free will exists. Nothing says it does.

There's a really great book about that subject called "Who's in charge?" written by Michael Gazzaniga.

To summarize the book while completely glossing over the details, your brain processes information separately in multiple parts of your brain and a specific part of your brain is tasked to rationalize that information. If your two hemispheres couldn't talk to each other, that part of your brain would come to different conclusions as it lacks the information from the other hemisphere. If it lacks enough information to make a normal conclusion, it makes things up on the go, to rationalize the conclusion it makes.

It partially proves that the concept of free will does somewhat exist, but that your brain will also make up information if it needs to and the result you interpret as something completely rationalized can sometimes be an illusion.
2
1
2
@phnt @amerika @0 @Tony @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sapphire @sj_zero @skylar @threalist That is really interesting.

(Although I think "free will" is so ill-defined that anything could mean anything; I can say that I perceive myself as having directed my own actions, even when it can be demonstrated that I have not. At least as far as I can observe, free will exists, but I don't think the question of whether or not free will exists is vague and meaningless: it has no implications. If I feel hungry, I'll eat, even if you can prove to me that I am not hungry. If you could prove conclusively that love does not exist, everyone will continue to behave as if it does. Even people with an unshakeable conviction that they know what free will is and that it does not exist will themselves behave as if it does exist. It's not a criticism, I just can't figure out what the question is, what the answer would mean, and whether or not it would matter if an answer could exist. I can understand people being upset about whether or not Han shot first even though I do not care for Star Trek, but this question I can't understand.)
1
0
1
@phnt @0 @Tony @amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sapphire @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> but I don't think the question of whether or not free will exists is vague and meaningless:

I don't think the question is *just* vague and meaningless. I missed a word and this changed the entire thing. I mean to say that it is not just a vague/meaningless question.
0
0
1
@billiam @amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist Here comes one of the guys that loses his keys and blames the Jews because literally the only thing he can think of is Jews.
fruitninja.png
2
0
0

@p @amerika @skylar @ins0mniak @threalist @sj_zero @cjd @h4890 @billiam i dont know if this is an optical illusion or not but i saved it on the pictures folder anyway

0
0
1
@amerika @p @h4890 @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

>I'm never going to be as handsome as Brad Pitt.

Ha Im way better looking than that loser.
0
0
1

Cuddly Lovely Sassy Motherfucker verified - https://the-mad-pirate-prints.teemill.com/

@p @amerika @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @billiam @sj_zero @threalist Like the modern US Philosopher Lizzo once said:" I blame it on the jews, I blame it on the Jews, I blame it on the Jews, on the Jews, on the Jews".
2
0
0
@dj @amerika @billiam @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist He's gonna slice those oranges to demonstrate his swordsmanship, I have seen this in video games.
0
0
0
@h4890 @phnt @amerika @Tony @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @0 @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

> the debate has been raging in philosophy for atleast a 1000 years.

That's how it is with stuff that has no real answer because any answer you give has zero consequences, meaning no effect in the real world, meaning no way to prove either. It's just a matter of outlook.
1
0
0

@p @amerika @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist everyone in or seeking a position of power is acting out of malice, by definition.

1
1
1
@amerika @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

First thing that comes to mind is "caveat emptor" given arguably the majority of projects related to infosec these days are actually just honeypots created with fed money to con privacy/anonymity oriented people into giving up both in exchange for a supposed free lunch. Either that or security theatre designed to part fools from their money. Plus everyone I've heard from in the pen-testing community tends to agree that security auditing is just a way to check a box on the marketing hype, and 9 times out of 10 the same problems are cited year after year with jack squat ever done to resolve them. $0.02
1
0
1
@p @Tony @phnt @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @0 @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freewill/

No one has observed free will in nature, so advocates have to prove their position. Attempts to do so almost always involve moral and legal logic. In the meantime:

https://ia903008.us.archive.org/1/items/NietzscheTruthLiesInANonmoralSense1873/Nietzsche%20-%20Truth%20%26%20Lies%20in%20a%20Nonmoral%20Sense%20%281873%29.pdf

The medical side is closer to this, i.e. the self-rationalizing human brain.
1
0
0
@amerika @0 @Tony @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @phnt @sapphire @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> so advocates have to prove their position.

I haven't advocated anything. I specifically said several times that the question of its existence is meaningless and has no impact on the world.

You have made an assertion, though, that it definitely does not exist. Please explain what it is. If you can be certain whether or not it exists, you can say what it is, because that's a necessary prerequisite. This question keeps getting ignored but this question answers whether or not there's anything to discuss. Without an answer to this question, there isn't anything to discuss.

I can say there's no gorilla in my living room, and I can tell you what a gorilla is. I can say there is no prime number below ten except 2, 3, 5, and 7, and I can define a prime number below ten. I can say there is no such thing as a perpetual motion machine. I can say there's no woman that isn't crazy, and I can tell you what "woman" and "crazy" mean, and you can tell me I'm right or wrong but at least we know what we're talking about.

So if you can say there is no such thing as free will, then you must be able to say what free will is and you must be able to explain how you distinguish between a case in which free will acts and a case in which free will has been absent. Otherwise it doesn't mean anything to say "yes" or "no" to the question. It's not even wrong, it's "Colorless green ideas sleep furiously." We're just babbling.

This isn't a rhetorical trick, it's not an irrelevant question. We don't even know if we agree or not because I have no idea if we're talking about the same thing.
1
0
0
@bonifartius @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

I disagree. Power is a way to get stuff done. It is in fact the only way stuff gets done widely enough to be beneficial.
2
0
0
@amerika @bonifartius @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> widely enough to be beneficial.

Widely enough to be widely beneficial; this reasoning gets you stuck in the grandiosity tarpit. I don't need authority to cook something, and I have benefited from a meal if I do so.
1
0
0
@toiletpaper @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

Interesting. To me it seems simply to be a jobs program at this point.
1
0
0
@amerika @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

Possibly. It used to be that anyone concerned with Infosec or Appsec would quickly find their job being downsized just for mentioning it. I had that issue at more than one employer where their code was as secure as a wet paper bag and I got anything from a condescending head-pat to a swift boot in the ass for opening my mouth. It was more rare for any execs to give a shit whatsoever unless they had to demonstrate compliance with HIPPA, PIPEDA or such. Even then, it was typically the bare minimum. At least there are nominally infosec jobs/budgets which exist now. Whether most of the amount to anything is another question.
2
0
1
@toiletpaper @amerika @Leyonhjelm @cjd @djsumdog @h4890 @sj_zero @threalist

> Even then, it was typically the bare minimum.

The bare minimum to ensure that they could wash their hands, whether or not it accomplished the security goals. The goal is compliance (and thus avoiding liability) rather than security.

There was a very good writeup of the Crowdstrike problem where the guy used (maybe invented) the phrase "checkbox compliance" and it sums up all of these people.
1
0
0
@p @Tony @phnt @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @0 @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

I didn't lump you in with advocates. I am not interested in the "free will" debate; all I have to do is point out that no one has come up with a convincing pair of definition/proof for it.
1
0
0
@p @amerika @djsumdog @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

100%. The Crowdstrike situation is just a symptom of that. It's been the status quo from day one. But arguably the fact that there are even checkboxes at all is a small step in the right direction compared to where things started off.
2
0
1
@p @Tony @phnt @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @0 @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

We'd have to be on a service with real threading and persistence to know, but it was never a focus for me.
1
0
0
@amerika @0 @Tony @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @phnt @sapphire @sj_zero @skylar @threalist We're on one. I don't know which frontend you're using but these things persist indefinitely and threads are just a matter of UI; I recommend bloat.
1
0
0
@p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @bonifartius @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

Category confusion. Power leads to beneficial things, but other things can lead to beneficial things as well.
1
0
0
@amerika @bonifartius @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist

> Power is a way to get stuff done. It is in fact the only way stuff gets done widely enough to be beneficial.

A thing does not need to be wide to be beneficial.
1
0
1
@toiletpaper @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

Checkboxes = means-over-ends thinking = necessarily going to miss something.
0
0
1

@amerika @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist cooperation is a way to get things done.

power is a way to force others to do things that one wants.

another question is "beneficial" to whom? "the majority"? "oppressed minorities"?

that's how we end with conservatives/liberals/other-flavor-of-cronyism lamenting about how rigged and flawed things are until they are in power and suddenly it's democracy that need to be defended.

2
0
1
@bonifartius @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

Beneficial to a specific civilization and/or humanity.

Oftentimes minority rights and majority practices stand in the way of that.
0
0
0
@toiletpaper

It's really not. The checkboxes more often than not get in the way of genuine efforts to improve things.

@p @amerika @cjd @djsumdog @h4890 @sj_zero @threalist
0
0
1
@bonifartius @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sj_zero @threalist

Suspect, 68, would jog around soccer pitch at housing estate exposing his buttocks and then remove shorts completely in public park, residents say.

https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/law-and-crime/article/3281738/elderly-hong-kong-man-arrested-allegedly-exercising-nude-public-park

Anarchy's a mess. I don't want to tell the guy he can't exercise naked, either, but there are reasons people do this.
1
0
0
@p @Tony @phnt @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @0 @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

I tend to see it as more like IRC than USENET (on your recommendation).

Big problem it faces is the amount of space required to archive a full feed, apparently.

Luckily normie Mastodon seems to have slowed its growth.
1
0
1
@amerika @0 @Tony @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @phnt @sapphire @sj_zero @skylar @threalist Yeah, I think it is more like that, but threads are not hard to keep track of.

> Big problem it faces is the amount of space required to archive a full feed, apparently.

Well, I have a fix for that in progress.
1
0
0
@p @amerika @Tony @phnt @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

A hallmark of capacity, the inability to define what is claimed absent because of the referenceability of the medium.

"I can't possibly define 'free will', I don't have nearly enough RAM, and it doesn't exist anyway."
2
0
3
@0 @Tony @phnt @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

This has always been the problem for "free will" advocates: they can't define it.
2
0
0
@0 @p @Tony @amerika @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @phnt @sapphire @sj_zero @skylar @threalist My diatribe on free will boils down to "people can choose to be wrong even when confronted entirely with the naked truth."

Without free will the truth would be some magical spell that once heard, could never be denied. We know this is not the case, and therefore we must allow that free will exists, at least in the capacity to choose to be wrong, which informs all subsequent actions guided by reason stemming from these false propositions.
2
0
1
@amerika @bonifartius @cjd @h4890 @ins0mniak @sj_zero @skylar @threalist That doesn't seem like a problem of anarchy, then, but a failure of the owner to maintain dicks being covered.

Anyway, I gotta get the hell out of this thread unless one of you knows how to speed this shit up.
1
0
0
Yes, it seems like that discussion of free will boils down to: "is a man a piano key who will play the same note when pressed every time?"

If a man is a gear, a cog who will always do as expected, then there is no free will. If instead A man might surprise you and choose to do something you didn't expect, then they do have free will.

I think many progressive ideologies deny free will and say that if a man chooses wrong it's because they were played like a piano key and they had no choice, whereas most ideologies through history claim you do have a choice and thus it is your duty to choose well.

I'm one of 6 kids. We had the same family, grew up in the same house, often shared bedrooms growing up, went to the same schools with often the same teachers, but everyone's path is vastly different. I can't experience that and believe we are piano keys.

They made their own choices which led to those external factors. If you choose to walk down a certain path, the road ahead has certain paths and forks. For me, I can see many people and how my life could have turned out more like theirs if I'd chosen differently, and those decisions were choices someone personally makes. In some cases you can see how similar our paths were until a critical decision that changes the paths we walk, and it's often not a circumstance but an actual decision we personally make. Whether those decisions are rational or irrational doesn't really matter in that respect from my point of view. Both are part of us and our minds and our will.
0
0
1
@0 @Tony @phnt @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

No, actually. I can tell where you did not spend time in high school and college.
0
0
0
@toiletpaper @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

I find regulations really destructive, generally, since they are a shield against legal liability and therefore take over management thinking.
0
0
0
It's a double edge sword. Not having good food regulations and labeling leads to the situation in China. I had a Chinese roommate when I lived in Australia who said a lot of meat had filler or was injected with water so it looked fresh when it wasn't. Look up Chinese "Gutter oil" too.

But you're right, regulations are also use to squash out competition. It also keeps people who want to buy questionable things, like raw milk products, from being able to accept the risks and doing so. At the same time, fat retard law-tuber Barnes is defending Amos Miller, an Amish farmer whose raw milk has gotten people sick. The state has even tried to work with the guy to decontaminate his tanks, but he just ignores them and keeps selling.

And in the US, the food industry has lobbied against labeling GMO food. So unlike many places in Europe, you can't tell if a food comes from genetically modified crops by the packaging.
1
0
0
@h4890

Why are you making gay offtopic arguments? Either the mandated checkboxes help or hurt efforts to make things better and they pretty much always make them worse. Politics are not relevant to whether the method improves or damages a product or effort.

@amerika @djsumdog @p @cjd @toiletpaper @sj_zero @threalist
0
0
0
@h4890 @djsumdog @p @cjd @Leyonhjelm @toiletpaper @sj_zero @threalist

I think the three converge: regulation favors monopolies, delights bureaucrats/politicians, and enables regulatory capture.

Not a massive endorsement...
0
0
0
@h4890 @amerika @djsumdog @p @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

> That's why deregulation is to abhored by politicians.

Also why the left loves having the commie agenda pushed in schools, since anything involving deregulation is automatically smeared as "capitalist". Because useful idiots are useful.
0
0
0
@h4890 @amerika @djsumdog @p @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

In economic terms that seems to be true, but I wouldn't let the modern right-wing off the hook or characterise them as any more "educated". If anything it's the reverse. The left are stupid because their relative over-education gives them undue conceit in the correctness of their opinions/indoctrination.

Speaking from personal experience, most of the right-wingers I've spoken to are out to lunch. They can't claim to have critical thinking skills while grovelling towards a character from a 2,000 year old pseudohistorical fantasy novel, and constantly knob gobbling zionist cock. But at least they don't buy into the commie shit. They have that much going for them.

When it comes to the OP (infosec) however, they're usually first to jump on the bandwagon of reducing data security if the subject get's linked to "criminalz" or "wutabout the childrens" or some other laughable but tried and true transparent manipulation used by political hacks to erode basic human rights.
1
0
0
@toiletpaper @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

With info security, we have to assume attackers both foreign and criminal.
1
0
0
@amerika @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

> With info security, we have to assume attackers both foreign and criminal.

Of that I have zero doubts. I'm not an infosec professional (at least not on paper), but I do routinely get both a chuckle and a shudder when I review my server logs on a daily basis.
1
0
0
You probably know more than most "professionals" ... I've turned down two infosec jobs in the past. For one they waited 2 months to get back to me and I had already taken another offer as a dev, and with another it was an internal position I didn't even want, but they convinced me to apply just because I posted something in Slack about going to Defcon. (The position looked bad; they had no security developers and desperately needed one to script a lot of their manual log analysis .. paid less than my dev role at the same company. Hard pass).

I got drafted into one security team at a consulting company, for only one day a week (priorities right?) and it ended up being mostly scripting update tools and checklists.

Ever security team at other companies I've worked with were always borderline incompetent. Because of that, their relationship to developers was almost always adversarial.
0
0
0
Let the states handle it. The smart ones will set an example and the dumb ones will eventually copy it.
1
0
0
I am for smaller government: no EU .. people say smaller nations can't scale. I think they'd scale more slowly, and when they do so, it will require more open standards and interoperability (not just with tech, but laws, procedures, etc.)

I think you'd eventually still get confederations across small countries for things like food safely and regulation, and would see corruption grow there, but it would still be an improvement over mega-states.
0
0
0
@pwm @Tony @phnt @p @h4890 @ins0mniak @skylar @cjd @0 @sapphire @sj_zero @threalist

For sure, and more troublingly, there is no guarantee that people want the best answer.

Then again, there is no reason to take their wants into consideration unless those wants lead to good results.
0
0
1
@h4890 @djsumdog @p @cjd @Leyonhjelm @toiletpaper @sj_zero @threalist

These countries basically exist as financial hubs outside of the heavy regulatory burden of the West.

It's an important reminder that democracy has shat the bed.
0
0
0
@h4890 @amerika @djsumdog @p @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

At this point the EU is a colony of the USA with a little help from UK. The war in Ukraine is really in my view a way to control the energy and other critical resources of Europe, largely by making them less dependent on Russia and more dependent on USA. While there might be a few edge cases in certain policy areas per situation, in effect all the EU governments are puppet states of USA now. As to the USA, it's basically an oligarchy run by globalist gangsters.
1
0
1
@h4890 @djsumdog @p @cjd @Leyonhjelm @toiletpaper @sj_zero @threalist

Whatever nation adopts "value for money" is going to become the wealthiest on Earth in a short time span.

Leadership is necessary, police are necessary, etc. but government has gone too far and equality was its golden ticket.
0
0
0
@Leyonhjelm @amerika @cjd @djsumdog @h4890 @p @sj_zero @threalist

> You're allowed to name the Jew on the fediverse

People advocate for ethnic nationalism and fascism, and yet revile "the Jew" for being better at it than they are. It's just penis envy. I want none of it.
0
0
0
@h4890 @djsumdog @amerika @p @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

I was thinking yesterday about how "the market" also succumbs to a "tragedy of the commons". The classic prototype is a public field shared by a bunch of cattle ranchers who have incentive to put as many cattle of their own on the field as possible to maximise profit, lest their competitors do so instead. Ultimately the field can no longer sustain the herds and the whole system collapses.

But this is functionally identical to corporations which try to maximise profit by screwing everyone over for the smallest margin. The end result is the externalisation and destruction of the planet at the expense of everyone but the executive class and shareholders. Ultimately it's unsustainable, the market collapses, and everyone loses.

So in effect, the argument for the current form of market capitalism suffers the exact same problem that capitalists like to point the finger at socialism/communism for. I'm not sure what the solution is, but just lobbing another libertarian market utopia at it doesn't strike me as a viable option. At least not unless it can address that demonstrable reality.
1
0
0
@toiletpaper @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

I tell people I am part-libertarian. That is, I think libertarian theory works great for the economy.

We also need social systems and political systems.

For the former, I choose culture, and for the latter, aristocracy.

All other things fail hard.

Anarchy's a mess! -- but it's what most humans want, at least subsidized anarchy with grocery stores and mall cops.
1
0
0
@amerika @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

I have sympathy for libertarians, mainly because they've taken the morally correct stance on just about every single human rights and economic issue since the inception of the idea, and not just in lip service, but also in practice. It's main drawback is that it's not appealing to authoritarians who want to coercively foist their personal delusions on everyone, which sadly is the majority. I do identify as "anarchist", but in my view that is nearly synonymous with libertarian (originally "libertarian" was what french anarchists rebranded as to avoid the guillotine) everywhere but north america. To me that means first and foremost that equal rights (to say "no" without experiencing reprisal) belong exclusively to individuals, and in practice take personal responsibility for your own decisions/actions and walk the talk. It has nothing to do with utopian ideologies.
0
0
0
@h4890 @toiletpaper @djsumdog @p @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

Karl Popper got it wrong as usual. The "paradox of intolerance" is that the notion of "tolerance" is paradoxical because it is purely symbolic.

I generally like the idea that people can do whatever they want and live how they want, but reality punishes that.

If you do not filter out the dysfunctional... their agenda ALWAYS includes dominance of you and those like you.

So the idea of Utopia is dead, and so is the idea of tolerance, despite how emotionally appealing those are to me.
1
0
0
@amerika @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

The paradox of tolerance gets taken out of context quite often. Here's perhaps the most important point of Popper's thesis on the subject.

“In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols."

In other words, if you are intent on forbidding discussion in favour of violent coercion, then you need to be put down like the rabid animal you are.
1
0
0
@h4890 @djsumdog @p @cjd @Leyonhjelm @toiletpaper @sj_zero @threalist

I favor direct liability.

If your food makes someone sick, you are responsible.

The most advanced legal systems combined criminal and civil law.
0
0
0

..it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.

The irony is that this perfectly describes every single person posting that paradox of tolerance comic on reddit.

1
0
0
@h4890 @amerika @djsumdog @p @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

> libertarianism, is that in the long term I see no protection from it turning into a medieval system with lords, kings and serfs.

Agreed. Already the population is being effectively reduced to a bunch of renters whose only means of subsistence is to barter their labour power in exchange for basic necessities, often hand-to-mouth. So by whatever name, it amounts to the same thing. That's why I'm more inclined towards Ostrom's perspective than I am a hard-line "capitalism" vs "socialism" trope of economic/political ideology.
0
0
0
@h4890 @toiletpaper @djsumdog @p @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

"I see no protection from it turning into a medieval system with lords, kings and serfs."

Possibly that is the natural state of humanity. Manorial feudalism however was unique to the West (Hajnal line).

"The only protection I can see is a strong culture enforced from birth"

Yes, same here, although in an actual culture, it too is an incentive or opportunity as @FourOh-LLC would say.
0
0
0
@h4890 @amerika @djsumdog @p @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

I agree. I don't think Popper was advocating pre-crime. But in any case, you can see exactly the dynamic you're talking about with the modern left vs. right dynamic. Both sides accuse each other of being intolerant and violent, and will resort to force to supposedly prevent it. The left is usually the first to taut the paradox of tolerance, while hypocritically shouting "punch the nazi" out the other side of their mouth (in which case "nazi" means "people I don't like / agree with"). It's fucking retarded.

This article puts a different spin on it that I think is worth considering.

https://aeon.co/essays/reciprocity-not-tolerance-is-the-basis-of-healthy-societies
1
0
0

I think about reciprocity often in the context of why human ethics don't extend to animals. I think this has a lot to do with why we put "pet" animals in a different ethical category than other animals. We have experience with pets reciprocating non-violence with us, but we have no such expectations of a cougar we cross paths with on a hike.

0
0
0
@nicholas @amerika @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

Not sure what comic you mean (I'm not on reddit), but presumably they're misconstruing it as per usual. Hence my reason to cut/paste that quotation of Popper's actual statement on the matter. I've found that most people who cite the paradox of tolerance are exactly the type of people Popper considered to be enemies of the open society.
0
0
0
Edited 1 year ago

I don't know how you feel about homesteading as the origin of property, but certainly large numbers of libertarian/anarcho-capitalists seem to find it compelling. I don't see how under that framework for instance a beaver mixing their labor with natural resources doesn't give them private ownership over their dam and river. If there is a consciousness threshold for rights, that raises some uncomfortable questions about people with cognitive impairments / degeneration.

0
0
0

⚡⛥ Maður Margvalds ⛦⚡

Edited 1 year ago
@h4890 @nicholas @amerika @djsumdog @p @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

I haven't read the entirety of both volumes of the Open Society and It's Enemies. But about 12 years ago I read sizeable chunks of it when it was still available for free download on IA. The quote I pasted was from notes I made around that time in response to seeing a tonne of BS being spewed by leftists on FarceBook, mainly of the "Punch a Nazi." variety directed towards anyone who didn't subscribe to their asinine extremism (see attached meme). As still today, they love to think that Popper backs up their claim, when in fact taken in context it's precisely the opposite. I also read The Logic of Scientific Discovery and some more obscure stuff like Three Worlds (actually one of my favourites on the mind/body problem). https://tannerlectures.org/lectures/three-worlds/ I sometimes think I should have a blog to have a more permanent linkable place to share these ideas/commentary, but alas, I do not. Probably never will tbh. It's ephemeral, and my advice is you're better off getting it from the horse's mouth (ie. Popper).
1
0
1
@toiletpaper @nicholas @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

If you are not posting controversial content, it takes a few minutes to set up a WriteAs, Substack, Wordpress, or Blogger account.
1
0
0
@amerika @nicholas @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

> If you are not posting controversial content...

...then it's not worth posting.
1
0
0
@toiletpaper @nicholas @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

No, I mean controversial in the sense of "Right-wing" and or race, class, ethnicity, or gender genetic realism.
1
0
0
@amerika @nicholas @djsumdog @p @h4890 @cjd @Leyonhjelm @sj_zero @threalist

Let's put it this way... everywhere I've had a social media account in the past decade and change has been censored into oblivion. Nor am I willing to subject myself to spontaneous KYC bullshit in order to retain access to my account(s). At least here I have a modicum of pseudonymity and somewhat the possibility of an audience finding me that has relevant engagement and some at least rudimentary critical thinking ability.
0
0
0