Conversation
🔻 aetios 🇪🇺
aetios@sns.minovsky.space
@georgia google doesn't give a shit, they're in that to change the rules
0
0
6
Crystal Seth (Aryan Hypermunculus)
Seth_Wachhaltamittel@poa.st
@georgia Can I sue them for money?
1
0
0
SuperUmaFriend 
SuperSnekFriend@poa.st
@georgia
The rich rule of over the poor, and the lender rules over the borrower. W3C cannot do anything effective unless they want to rock the boat and risk funding loss.
The rich rule of over the poor, and the lender rules over the borrower. W3C cannot do anything effective unless they want to rock the boat and risk funding loss.
1
0
2
cool_boy_mew
coolboymew@shitposter.world
@SuperSnekFriend @georgia So another cucked completely worthless organization that just exists for very little reasons now?
1
0
3
W3C is like a weaker form of the IEEE, which in turn is a weaker form of the ISO.
So no, Google is just breaking a standardization. You're free to use the controlled alternative, though (which also sends data to Google).
So no, Google is just breaking a standardization. You're free to use the controlled alternative, though (which also sends data to Google).
1
1
0
Kevin Karhan 
kkarhan@infosec.space
@georgia when do #consumers and #cartel #regulators 'harrass' #Google into #compliance and bans #ValueRemoving bs like #ClownFlare and #JavaScript?
https://infosec.space/@kkarhan/113315145550212900
Also #plz add #LinkToSource...
0
0
0
@Marvelous7578 @georgia not necessarily...
See @torproject / #TorBrowser!
1
0
0
Yeah, of course.
I use Waterfox myself, which seems to me, to not send much metadata back.
But of course the Tor Browser is going to be the best at privacy.
I use Waterfox myself, which seems to me, to not send much metadata back.
But of course the Tor Browser is going to be the best at privacy.
0
0
0