Conversation
@scathach Theocratic Pagan, unfathomably based
1
0
1
@scathach I don't particularly know why it put me anti, I was most neutral.
0
0
0
@scathach Martin Luther and his consequences have been a disaster for the human race
Religious Values Test Neutral t…
0
0
2
@scathach my Judaism score would be way higher if it didn't gave questions implying an equivalency between Judaism and Zionazism
5
0
4
@sathariel @scathach Dumb shit, I should have got 100% anti on the first 5 and only didn't because several questions pitted Abrahamic monkey nonsense against each other (who gives a shit about some schism or heresy, into the trash it all goes) and because I didn't say that the adherents of these evil religions are evil themselves.

The Dharmic and Pagan sliders are accurate (I don't believe Samsara is le bad,) the Satanist one is a bullshit false dichotomy (the Christian Satan is not the antagonist of the true divine,) and the symbols and terms for anti-Judaism (the test was careful to differentiate between religion and race when it came to Judaism but used the racial misnomer "anti-Semitic", also being opposed to the Yahwic egregore does not make you a Nazi) and anti-Islam (opposing Islam means you are le Christian, also being opposed to something means you are afraid of it chuddy) piss me off.

Overall: Dumb test BUT it's based for giving me 100% Pagan. Thank you for reading my blog post.
3
0
4

@nyx@social.xenofem.me @scathach@stereophonic.space im pretty sure the only way you can get antisemitic is if you think jews deserve to die for being jewish meanwhile im extremely anti-catholic apparently for just thinking their religion is wrong

1
0
1
@sathariel @scathach LOL WAIT A MINUTE, THE PRO PAGAN SYMBOL IS MOLOCH, WOW
0
0
3
@nyx @scathach The questions feel like they were written by steeve bannon.
0
0
1
@anemone @nyx @scathach all these 50/50s are me saying things like "Judaism is an evil religion?: Agree" and then "Jewish theocracy is an ideal form of government?: Agree
3
0
1
@nyx @anemone @scathach yeah i wasn't expecting myself to be so pro-satanism, but theological satanism is actually based as fuck
0
0
0
@druid @scathach I never expect so much from these tests, they're only for a little fun and shitpost. Agree/disagree/neutral are very limited for knowing someone's views on anything.
1
0
2

@nyx @scathach we didnt bother taking it cause we figured it would do exactly that -_-

0
0
1
@salt @anemone @nyx @scathach these quizzes are generally dumb but there were a few questions that actually made me think for a sec.
3
0
1
@anemone @nyx @scathach @salt a lot of things about this quiz are highly questionable politics-wise lmao.
0
0
1
@scathach why is it asking me all this shit? palamite theology?? i dont have time for this bullshit. I just closed the tab.
0
0
2
@rowb1t @salt @nyx @scathach
Yet another westoid religious quizz full of weird biases, but i am amused at the synthesis of satanic buddhist paganism, kinda correct lol
0
0
3
@nyx @scathach yeah i gave up on this quiz i do not respect quizzes you know what after this shit let chinese AI algorithms do whatever they want with whats left of the world at this point honestly
0
0
0
@hidden @sathariel @scathach ONLY HALF ANTI-CHRISTIAN, NGMI IN THE PAGAN THEOCRACY
1
0
0
@druid @sathariel @scathach YEAH CUZ EVERY CHRISTIAN QUESTION IS JUST PITTING THE THREE CHRISTIANITIES AGAINST EACH OTHER. It's like bruhh... you can argue amongst yourselves...
1
1
3
@hidden @sathariel @scathach OK yeah, this is true. It's a permanent MONKEY FIGHT 🐒
0
0
0
@hidden @sathariel @druid @scathach Fun one despite the obvious flaws in the test
4
0
1
@nerthos @sathariel @druid @scathach Trying not to say "based" at the antisemitism number
2
0
3
@hidden @sathariel @druid @scathach I do unironically despise them, memes aside. Everything about their false broken faith is repulsive and fires up my evil detector.
1
1
4
@druid @hidden @sathariel @scathach Stabilizing force in the west, can't remove it right now or you'll just get the vacuum filled by something much worse like islam. Also deeply tied to culture.
2
0
1
@druid @hidden @sathariel @scathach Also, most of the christianity questions were not about christianity itself but just "which variant of it you like more"
Hence my results being mostly "you dislike protestantism more than the other two" than any true indication of adherence to it.
0
0
2

Maija (Happy Sperg Housewife Arc) 🇱🇻 blobcathearttrans niceblush

3
0
2

Maija (Happy Sperg Housewife Arc) 🇱🇻 blobcathearttrans niceblush

@nerthos @hidden @sathariel @druid @scathach i have a higher antisemetism score than your and i'm not even the racist one here
1
0
2

Maija (Happy Sperg Housewife Arc) 🇱🇻 blobcathearttrans niceblush

@hidden @sathariel @nerthos @druid @scathach it barely asked shit about islam i was reasonably negative on it, though not really much any moreso than christianity. that test was like half christian doctrines i swear
1
0
2

Maija (Happy Sperg Housewife Arc) 🇱🇻 blobcathearttrans niceblush

@hidden @sathariel @nerthos @druid @scathach yeah but it doesn't ask about shit like that but rather like, shoudl u worship kaaba (no) are they peaceful (somewhat?) is muhammed divine or whatever (no) idk why i came out as positive
0
0
1

@hidden @maija @sathariel @nerthos @scathach It is very sad, the way they make women fold up their minds and souls so small. Covered heads and downcast eyes. Nothing blossoms. Brothers in Islam, made slightly wrong. Nothing more.

Just the latest manifestation of Yahweh’s reduction of Asherah to an object in his hand.

0
0
3
@scathach I respect all Americans who want to put Prots on pikes
0
1
1
@maija @hidden @sathariel @nerthos @druid @scathach Hate Catholicism for bringing on western decadence, indifferent towards its schisms as there was nothing they could do to fix an inherently effeminate set of beliefs.
3
0
2

Dr. Ngandu 🇨🇳 | KILL ALL VIDEO GAMES blobcattableflip

Edited 11 months ago
@nerthos @maija @hidden @sathariel @druid @scathach Even our accents are jeet-like. Did an AI accent determination test and it came back as 70% jeet, 30% Spanish iirc.
2
0
2
@anemone @nyx @scathach >fundamentalist pagan

Based

Also, the quiz is very badly written. “Do you agree that Mohammad was a nonce” vs “What is your opinion on this specific theological aspect of the Orthodox faith?”
1
0
0

@arcana@fedi.layer02.net @nyx@social.xenofem.me @scathach@stereophonic.space I think it classified me as pagan mainly because I think animals are cool and based and am pro-polytheism

1
0
1

@arcana@fedi.layer02.net @nyx@social.xenofem.me @scathach@stereophonic.space idk if there are any shrimps cults but I know that eels are considered divine in a few cultures which is incredibly based

0
0
1
@maija @hidden @sathariel @nerthos @druid @scathach Don't you accuse me of such things! niggaangery
1
0
2

Maija (Happy Sperg Housewife Arc) 🇱🇻 blobcathearttrans niceblush

0
0
0

Maija (Happy Sperg Housewife Arc) 🇱🇻 blobcathearttrans niceblush

@Cyrillic @hidden @sathariel @nerthos @druid @scathach hey WOAH okay buddy you can shit on islam all you want but what do you have against fucking goats?
1
0
2
@maija @hidden @sathariel @nerthos @druid @scathach And yet it says I'm a jeet...
2
0
1
@nerthos @wowaname @hidden @sathariel @scathach Education, illumination, revelation - and absolutely no nostalgic apologia.
1
0
2
@nerthos @maija @hidden @sathariel @druid @scathach I don't see race, we are all of the same divine essence, advaita vedanta and shit. There is only varna that divides us.
0
0
2

Maija (Happy Sperg Housewife Arc) 🇱🇻 blobcathearttrans niceblush

@Cyrillic @hidden @sathariel @nerthos @druid @scathach sheep are cute yeah true
sheep girls and goat men
1
0
2
@maija @Cyrillic @hidden @sathariel @nerthos @druid @scathach Is goatfucking popular in Latvia?
1
0
1
@hidden @wowaname @sathariel @nerthos @druid @scathach That what will replace christianity is the respective ethnoreligions of said Europeans.

If one is Slavic they fall under the high divine command of Perun. If Baltic then they fall under the command of Perkūnas. If Anglo than it is Odin. If German than also Odin. if French it is still Odin. If Greek than Deus.
1
0
2
@wowaname @sathariel @nerthos @druid @scathach This has never been the spiritual directive of a society, and never will be, and probably never should be. Although personal spiritual experience is deeply important, the divine should penetrate every aspect of life, which necessitates communal ritual. And some people will naturally end up as spiritual leaders through sheer virtue. Personal connection is important ofc but our individuality is an ephemeral fact of circumstance which the divine tends to dissipate into dust
1
0
2
@wowaname @sathariel @nerthos @druid @scathach Well it isn't but we're talking about the future of society. Society may not be responsible for a spiritual dilemma, but I am responsible, and anyone else with wisdom is, and we are a part of society
0
0
2
@nerthos @wowaname @hidden @sathariel @scathach You don't need manpower to spread ideas. Christianisation only required manpower because it was a matter of conquest. Nobody WANTED to worship their devil.

>Four generations

I'd call that a generously quick estimate. Even if it were twenty generations, that's a fraction of the time Christianisation took.
2
0
0
@hidden @wowaname @sathariel @nerthos @scathach My unironic vote is neopaganism. The Celtic revival has been spectacularly healthy for those it has affected. Who cares if it's a LARP? Stories and characters are the best way of understanding the world and the human condition. People are only averse to it because they are used to the insane transcendental literalism of Abrahamism. Nobody in ancient Scandinavia "believed" (in the sense that atheists scorn and covet) that the world was licked from a block of ice by a cow, it's a koan.

Paganism is both ancestrally and locally focused (and much mistaken purity spiralling is engaged in by those who consider the two inseparable; migrants have always taken their gods with them, that's why Britain has Celtic and Germanic gods) and this is infinitely healthier and more relevant than trying to universalise, especially with religions from distant places and times. When I was very young I thought the story of the Christian nativity took place in its own little fictional world, like a cartoon. The alien outfits, names, terms and objects seemed like something made up.

What happens when two people from different pagan cultures marry? They keep their gods and draw syncretic lines. I worship the smith, you worship the mother. Oh, those are your names for them? That's interesting! Yeah, we have three sisters in charge of fate too. How did YOUR trickster kill the King's heir?
1
1
2
@druid @wowaname @sathariel @nerthos @scathach Thinking about it more, an unholy mishmash of astrology and angels and wiccan charms on the manifest level and subverted-psychology, quantum physics, and agnostic incarnate spiritualism on the higher level is slowly making its way into the mainstream as a sort of folk religion in the wake of the now dying science-and-progress worship that pretty much everyone is keenly aware is incomprehensible nonsense
1
1
2
@hidden @wowaname @sathariel @nerthos @scathach I agree and I'm glad to see it, neopaganism is in vogue, I've seen a lot more western Dharmists lately, and Gnosticism is now so mainstream that even people who don't give a fuck understand jokes like "when Sophia says it's time for a Yaldabath." I can literally say "the 'urge" to people and they know I mean the Demiurge. Glorious fucking chaos.

My only concern is the presence of mystique cultivating, cult grooming attention whores - usually they cultivate an exoteric presence on twitter and an esoteric presence on discord or similar. Every one of them has a nonsense postmodern manifesto full of ontological and philosophical word salad, and most of them focus on shit like xenofeminism, annihilationism or other dumb meme positions. I try very hard not to say "they should be rounded up and shot," but they should be rounded up and shot.
1
0
3
@wowaname @hidden @sathariel @nerthos @scathach You're thinking about it the wrong way around: society INFORMS the spiritual dilemma. This is why I focus so much on pagan pantheons, because they offer a pluralistic model of society. Is Odin or Loki the "good guy?"
1
0
2
@andreas @wowaname @hidden @sathariel @nerthos @scathach Hmm, the usurping god of magic, who knows all the secret runes and ascends from the dying world sure does and up with a conspicuously big slice of Europe there. think

(Consider it admiration, Thursatru is awesome)
0
0
1
@druid @wowaname @sathariel @nerthos @scathach 100% true, neo-Paganism isn't a larp at all. In the Dao De Jing 2500 years ago Lao Tzu refers to the Gods as "images." Hinduism and Vedicism plays a lot with the Gods as aspects and masks and visions and moods and natural forces, and while most European paganism has been lost I'm agree it would be the same with them. Petty-literalism is a Hebrew-Greek worldview. Pagans understood the Gods as manifestations, as the anthropomorphic personal element of the anima (Greek not Jung) within things (Kami, Ancestors, local gods) and within patterns or forces. Agni is as real as fire is real, Brahma as real as the me I see in you is, Vishnu as real as falling in love, and Shiva as real as the soil from which a flower blooms, no more and no less.
1
2
4
@scathach Unfortunately I don't know shit about any of this so I'm just spamming 'unsure'
1
0
0
@Merc @scathach Mercurial you'd make a wonderful Buddhist. We could start you out with Theravada and then ZOOM in comes the Mahayana pill to cleanse your heart
1
0
0
@hidden @scathach Do you really think that I would be someone to embrace nothingness, be entirely at inner peace? I'd think my buzzing brain completely anathema to that
1
0
0
@Merc @scathach It's not nothingness, it's emptiness.
1
0
0
@hidden @scathach I mean they're categorically isomorphic. I value my ego.
1
0
0
@hidden @wowaname @nerthos @druid @scathach this is exactly how I see it, I loved that you even used the word patterns.
1
0
1
@Merc @scathach Look out fellas we got an ego valuer heyah. What's next "I value my pizza" "I value my money" "I value my house" ??? Never ends with these guise
1
0
0
@hidden @scathach I am my computations, the layer I place above reality to act in. If I am one with reality, I am nothing, and I don't like that
1
0
0
@Merc @scathach Ehhh just try it budddyyy. Feels so good not to worry, not to fear, not to hurt. Just to love and act and be free
1
0
0
@hidden @scathach It's an abnegation of my responsibility as a sentient being to create an discover. It is wrong to be a passive observer
1
0
0
@hidden @wowaname @nerthos @druid @scathach energy, patterns, vibrations and of course the magick of perception (that is another form of these)
0
0
1
@Merc @scathach Why do you think you stop acting if you recognise you are the observer instead of the actor? You keep acting just as much. Really it becomes more meaningful when you realise the connection between you and all other things

Also, emptiness isn't "nothing." It's potentiality. The idea is that there was once emptiness, and then there was all of this that's around us, the universe which sprung from emptiness. The emptiness is our core from which everything else springs, a great well of potential which we can do what we want with. That is Buddhism.
1
0
0
@hidden @scathach If you are one with the universe, necessarily you are acting with all the information you could be, which removes the individuality of your own mental model, which I think is bad.

In terms of garbage math religion, I can't disagree with that definition of emptiness, but not sure I want to believe in it in general. I don't yet know if all humans come from the same place.
2
0
0
@hidden @scathach It's not that you stop acting, it's that there is no longer a human aspect to it.
0
0
0
@Merc @scathach >If you are one with the universe, necessarily you are acting with all the information you could be

No cuz the thing that is one is not your brain, which is a tool, but you, which is your existence
1
0
0
@hidden @scathach I think I understand what you're saying, that people will still act with meaningful individuality even without their ego, but it isn't obvious to me that that's true.
2
0
0
@hidden @scathach Like, I've come to the conclusion that the purpose of life is computation, to develop art and science to describe logic in meaningful and consistent ways, and I think the ego is a big part of that
1
0
0
@Merc @scathach It is true! Because I am still here acting with meaningful individuality!
1
0
1
@hidden @scathach How do I know that what's meaningful for you will be meaningful for me?
1
0
0
@Merc @scathach You will always be able to do that no matter what, it's impossible to lose that ability
1
0
0
@hidden @scathach Well sure but I don't know that it's better or worse to do that without an ego
2
0
0
@Merc @scathach Because what I retained was what is meaningful to me, and what you retain will be what is meaningful to you.
1
1
1
@hidden @scathach I'm probably just saying meaningless stuff right now I've no idea if it holds up or makes sense
1
0
0
@Merc @scathach yeah tbh i have no idea whats going on im just procrastinating going tot he store cuz its like -30 or whatevs
1
0
0
@hidden @scathach Bruh there's no way it's gonna be open too much later
1
0
0
@Merc @scathach Probably same. Life is better to do with less ego, or at least mastery of your ego which is same path
1
0
1
@hidden @scathach I don't understand why that would necessarily be the case? I'd think if one were to be truly in tune with the world, it would force them to change in ways they may not like, and force them to become good people in ways that aren't inherently meaningful to them.

I guess this assumes that there exist people who are just evil - or rather, disconnected from the world - to such a degree that becoming connected to it would give them pain. I don't know that this is necessarily wrong.
0
0
0
@hidden @scathach Bruh if it were framed as 'mastery of your ego' rather than removing it entirely that'd make things way easier
2
0
0
@hidden @scathach I apologize for my shallow, reactive comments
0
0
0
@Merc @scathach Oh then just frame it that way silly. That's all religious practice and meditation and everything else is about.
1
0
0
@hidden @scathach Like you're still acting as you, you're just doing so optimally because you're slowing down and absorbing everything
1
0
0
@Merc @scathach Yeah you stay the same person, but you're less reactive, more free. Emotions go from taking you over to you controlling them. Your thoughts go from a tidal wave to something you peacefully observe. Desire is no longer about filling a hole, but about pure enjoyment. Etc.
1
0
0
@hidden @scathach I like the framing better that you're building up something new than destroying what you are

Of course necessarily ya gotta destroy some bits to be a better person but you don't wanna nuke yourself entirely
1
0
0
@Merc @scathach There's no nuking at all. It's just gaining self control basically. Think of how when you drink alcohol you lose your inhibitions. Someone who has a lot of experience with these things, like me, can turn my inhibitions on and off at will, as if it were a switch on the wall, merely by having experience with that part of my mind. Same with my emotions and desires. It makes it easy to do work too, I can much more easily decide to focus on something, or tune something out, or forget about one of my worries.
1
0
3
@nerthos @hidden @druid @sathariel @scathach @wowaname that would require people taking responsibility over themselves instead of delegating it to authority
1
0
3
@snacks @scathach i was raised in a catholic family line but got heccin euphoric 🎩 when i was 14 and left the church. Still nowadays I have a fairly balanced view of catholicism.
Later I got drawn to LaVey and stuff.
Also Judaism is pretty based tbh because orthodox judaism is the only abrahamic religion without schisms and with an unsevered connection to ancient magic
0
0
0
@druid @wowaname @sathariel @nerthos @scathach Unfathomably based. I hope to be a force for good and capture the vulnerable and keep them safe from the cult weirdoes inshallah
1
0
1
@hidden @wowaname @sathariel @nerthos @scathach That is very obviously the case, you show a clear preference for taking the knowledge and perspective that you have gained from your substantial studies and bringing them back to the everyday world where they can be practically applied. You obviously value what is real and observable, what is obvious and elementary. I think you will make a very positive contribution towards helping many curious agnostics to discover that the tools of the spirit were always within them - they've just been taught to ignore them.
0
0
0
@hakui @wowaname @hidden @sathariel @nerthos @scathach While this is certainly true, I'd also argue that we are functionally talking about people with impaired cognition. I'm not saying "Abrahamists are stupid," I'm saying that Abrahamism breaks a person's cognitive tools on purpose. The fundamental idea is to pass simulacra off as the real thing: they instinctively know things about the world that we all know in our hearts, but are given convincing platitudes as explanations for them, and kept from transgression through a combination of the glamour of conformity and the fear of reprisal. (Islam is the worst for this, the pleasure of submission is very real.)

From a magical perspective, the clearest illustration of this is Kabbalah. Because Judaism is an intellectual religion, serious Jews do not get very far before realising that they are trapped by an (imagined) ancestral and blood pact with an evil impostor. (Hence why the initiatory piece of Jewish esotericism is the Transparent Illusion, a rumination on the impossibility of convincing yourself that Merkabah predates the primordial waters.) This is why "the Talmud is about deceiving Yahweh, not following him." Because Jews have to be able to navigate the magical world, they need an authorised simulacra: the Sephiroth.

Islam does the same thing, Allah is a kind of parasitic lens through which viewing Brahman is allowed.
0
0
2
@wowaname @hidden @sathariel @nerthos @scathach Personally I'd call secularism (and atheism) a reaction to Christianity, I don't think it's impossible but I do think it's stripping vital context from the human experience. All leaders in the West want now is stability and economic growth, so they foster the myth that religions are like strange personality quirks and that anyone coming to dispute over them is taking them too seriously somehow (they even openly state that fundamentalism is the problem.) It's kind of like how having a religion is "awwww you're so sweet" but claiming to hear God is "hello human resources?"

I'm not gonna say I think we lost our way with the Enlightenment - I think it was dramatically necessary.
1
0
3
@nerthos @wowaname @hidden @sathariel @scathach The best way to get rid of something altogether is to do it with soft power and constant sweet denials that you're even doing it, which is why white genocide is working but the holocaust failed 😏
2
0
1
@nerthos @hidden @sathariel @scathach @wowaname Okay, shitposting aside, I do actually believe that the path to dechristianisation lies in the carrot rather than the stick. Look how much success the non-religious have had with decreasing Christianity simply by saying "restrictions are le bad, if you stop being Christian you can take dicks in your ass." They offer no meaningful alternative - just a big gaping hole, and as you say, you can't replace religion with "nothing." And yet they have, to some level, at least to the level where I can express my opinion that Christians worship the Zoroastrian devil without being murdered by them. (Thanks, Martin Luther!)

Religions don't die when they are finally defeated, especially not religions with a tradition of martyrdom. They die when they fizzle out.
1
0
0
@nerthos @wowaname @hidden @sathariel @scathach I can say that Jesus was the anti-christ without legal repercussions but I can't question the holy noombers LOL
1
0
1
@nerthos @wowaname @hidden @sathariel @scathach I agree that the result is totally unsustainable and in fact already collapsing, as Hidden pointed out with the emergence of widespread and chaotic folk religion. I would also add that I think The Powers That Be have ABSOLUTELY fucked up by allowing the cultural victory they achieved in the 20th century to be undone by its own celebration. You win by looking reasonable and sane and letting your enemies look like the madmen, not by making constant exhibitionist display, endlessly taunting them, and trying to marginalise them. They turned everything highly visible into a gaudy drag show, and every mouthpiece into an overtly anti-white one, and now they have a huge mob of angry chuds. You reap what you sew!

Christianity won over the Roman Empire *because* it was persecuted. If Romans had continued to treat Christians like some small and irrelevant cult of idiots, to be mocked with the graffiti of children, Christianity probably would have fizzled out. But they fed people from THE martyr religion to lions. 🙄

IMO the only way to achieve purity by force is to stop the corruption before it even begins, hence why Ieyasu Tokugawa is so based. 🧎

(Also some petty clarification: I'm not afraid of the AI arms race, I'm a doomgawker who wants the AGI to destroy the status quo, not that it matters what I think because we'll develop it this year or next. Also, I'm pro dicks in asses, it's trad. The Jews invented homomisia.)
1
0
1
@druid @wowaname @hidden @nerthos @scathach I think atheism is the natural outcome of Christianity. Religion with few to none spirituality will eventually evolve into that. And more if we consider a religion that's usually calling heretic to anyone who tries to actually experience something. Similarly you can "talk to god" through praying but if you claim to hear God in a non figuratively form there's probably something wrong with you.

I can understand why people get tired of empty rites, of things that seems totally nonsense, of the obligation to believe in something that they can't feel, observe or experience in any way. But they don't liberate from it, they only react as you say, the control only becomes obfuscated. But come on, what do you expect from a god that first became nameless? Moving to abstraction isn't a problem for him.
1
1
3
@sathariel @wowaname @hidden @nerthos @scathach This is true, and it's why Catholicism has proved so resilient: as Varg Vikernes says, it's 90% Paganism.
0
0
2