Conversation
the amount of bloodthirsty purely tribalistic people is disgusting. literally subhuman by the definition of the word since i describe humans as people with morals or ethics.
6
2
10
@shibao would be funny to scroll back and see how they reacted to charlie kirk getting shot
3
0
2

@7666 @shibao don't tread on me im a good person who loves the president and ice I love america

get shot and dies

0
0
0
@shibao I’m right there too, just not with either of these two sides. Living in MN seems like I have a choice to make.
1
0
1
@awl @shibao Choose your loved ones and stay out of this garbage. There aren't any good guys here, and certainly no one that has your best interests at heart.
1
0
1
@mrsaturday easy to do till I go down there to work and I’m caught in a crowd-control situation and I’m forced to use force simply to get out. @shibao
1
0
0
@awl @shibao That's still choosing your loved ones. They want you to come home safely. I've seen enough from you to know you've got a good head on your shoulders. If your boss is trying to make you put yourself in danger by having you operate around the mob, bring the work back. It's not worth it.
0
0
1
@shibao damn no need to get anti semitic
0
0
1
@7666@comp.lain.la actual libertarians are still out here but they are dwarfed by the number of people who call themselves libertarians because they're right wingers who want to feel special
1
0
0
@shibao @7666 Let's be fair, two authoritarian factions killing eachother in open warfare is great for actual libertarians. Thins the enemy numbers and also creates a fertile ideological garden for real libertarian ideas on the survivors, if they're smart enough to realize where their previous ideas got them (and the usual fondness of people to go for a different thing when the last one exploded on them)

Libertarians as a faction do not have the resources and manpower to enforce the NAP, so encouraging opposite authoritarian factions to expend themselves is the best play with the available hand.
0
1
1
@shibao i'd personally have it the other way around, people are defined by having moral considerations, so instead of "subhuman" it's more like "unperson"
0
0
1
@snacks @shibao literal gang violence shit
0
0
0

@shibao people are bloodthirsty and tribal because that is what millennia of selection created, those who did not behave so died - peace, civility, and republic are an exceptional state which require a very narrow set of conditions

those conditions are gone and so we return to a more martial and violent norm

the left have done sufficient violence and murder their power represents a threat to survival, the browns are a foreign hostile population

your ethics may have been fine in decades past, but we are well past any kind of civil society or social contract and in a factional slow burn race war and civil war and a color revolution by foreigners

1
0
0
@brigrammer@poa.st who is getting shot in the streets right now. right now we're 2/2 white people. you can try to rationalize them away as liberals or commies or jews or whatever else but we're 2/2. albeit he had a sig but just buying a sig doesn't warrant an execution in the streets
1
0
0

@shibao the US is dying, like most Western countries, and this is on purpose - the collapse is intentional and has been going on for decades

and the current regime is fucking that up - they are breaking long standing systems and schemes and inflows of migration and suppression of White hiring and so on

and this person was fighting to keep those fraud rings, those illegal laborers, those vote harvesting operations, etc. going

and now that he is dead I don't care, because he was a belligerent for a hostile force (whether he understood this or not) and were the situation sufficiently dire I would have shot him myself

because the tragectory the West is on is complete demographic collapse and the extermination of the White race - effectively the end of the world and ruin of civilization

and I highly doubt you will think this way or believe anything I just said - I am sure it sounds crazy and ridiculous because you do not share my priors

but that is the conflict and why I view him as nothing more than an enemy solider in a war he probably wasn't even aware is going on

and no, I don't think the current regime is the "good guys" - I just think a chunk of them see the current trajectory of things means collapse and their self interest happens to align with mine (at least temporarily)

1
0
0
@brigrammer@poa.st >this person was fighting to keep those fraud rings, those illegal laborers, those vote harvesting operations, etc. going
no he isn't, he's against the trump organization doing lawless authoritarian actions against a state which has a minimal presence of illegals. I was born in texas, there are bajillion more illegals in texas if you wanted to commit a street-reign of terror, but he is in minnesota on a personal grudge. if he wanted to actually deal with the fraud problem, he would get his shit straight in the books and then commit nighttime raids against the people who have their shit poorly documented in legal documents. but instead he is going around pulling off anybody he can get his hands on in the street, which is not only incredibly inefficient and cruel, but against american principles of freedom, justice and civil rights. he is belligerent for good reason, he is meeting an attack by a corrupt pedophile organization (remember those epstein files?) against the american people to distract from his atrocities.

we DO NOT NEED this conflict, it is ineffective and resulting in casualties of good americans who followed the social contract, lawfully carrying firearms and exercising their constitutional rights. THAT is the conflict being warred, completely ignoring the immigration enforcement which I believe we should have because laws should be enforced, but this enforcement is merely incidental. even if the hotspot was the minnesotan government, you could target that, but instead we are targeting fellow working class americans in the streets.

if this was ww2 that guy would be a prime candidate for a draft, an outdoorsman who at least got a pistol with a red dot. I know this is the bottom of the barrel with a sig but this is the people being murdered when there are a bajillion people hopping the border in texas.

this is a campaign warred by a man who has shit that will absolutely come to light with the bleaching power of public inspection and doing all he can to distract from it until then. this is not the man or the campaign to die on a hill for
0
0
0
@snacks @shibao "erm yikeserino that's uhh heckin problematic to quote him maybe have some heckin empathy chud???"
0
0
0