Wiener's thesis represents what historians call the "Sonderweg" (special path) interpretation of German history—the idea that German history logically proceeded from Luther to Hitler.
Wiener's book doesn't actually prove the connection—he shows similarities between Luther's and Hitler's views but doesn't demonstrate causation.
The fact that many German Lutherans supported Hitler while many others did not weakens the direct causation
Gordon Rupp published a direct response titled "Martin Luther: Hitler's Cause—or Cure" through Lutterworth Press in 1945, specifically countering Wiener's book.
Wiener's interpretation was common in American scholarship in the mid-20th century but was almost universally rejected by German historians in the 1960s who argued that Nazism was simply one instance of totalitarianism that arose in various countries, not something uniquely rooted in German Protestant culture.
スプリットショックウイルス †
@georgia Agnostic writers with their mid takes on Christianity and ultimately free will.
スプリットショックウイルス †
I scanned the image and am being told it's written by Aldous Huxley
>It (Lutheranism) worships a God who is neither just nor merciful... The Law of Nature, which ought to be the
This reads like an edgy highschool student crying about life being unfair. Orthodox Church, Catholicism and Lutheranism worship the same God. Stating anything other is blatantly false or massively opinionated. It really kills everything else being stated.