I'm not calling it "polyamory" anymore, exclusively referring to it as polygamy from now on. sorry but you're all Mormons

@nyx -gamy is patriarchal though

@nyx call it polyvampyry or something

@nyx plus I'm not mormon I'm quaker

@patchuun hate to break this to you but all sex is patriarchal

@patchuun okay Mormon

@nyx only Kunti is free of sin

@nyx stop taxonomizing me fascist!!

@patchuun @nyx -gamy is patriarchal. and so are the people doing it. - Erato, unfortunate victim of this sacrificial practice

@nyx @patchuun nobody be mean to nyx on tonight 2/22 girlbesties. dont correct her on anything or put up an argument. today is the annual reunion of her Scythe Dogma Awakening. lets be nice tonight or god forbid we will all be blasted to the depths. if theres any night not to do this its today. - Erato

@catholick @nyx tell Rebecca to play Scythe 2 it kicks ass

@patchuun @nyx shes sleeping but im sure this message will get to her in some way shape or form. - Erato

@nyx I'm sorry vivvy that wasnt meant to be mean to you, only to nyxie

@patchuun @nyx i just thought it was a weaksauce remark about something that doesn't warrant getting at peoples gullets about. there was a discussion and the discussion ended and the discussion could be reopened but if it were to be reopened it should be srs and not weaksauce

@patchuun @nyx i'm not offended or anything i just like my feddy to be good and not petty

@corpsedoll @nyx tbh it was intended as 100% a shitpost and not to be taken seriously at all

@patchuun @nyx its true, you are a friend

@nyx soaking with the girlies

@nyx what about calling it free love?
… although kinda sounds like hippy stuff.

@lanodan @nyx GNU/love. gpl is the gay penis liecense

@jeff @nyx Ain't no such thing, it's still eunuchs.

@lanodan free love is conceptually based even if it was practiced in a very flawed way by the counterculture (largely because of unexamined patriarchal norms (one of the best things Andrea Dworkin ever wrote is her chapter on this in Right-Wing Women)) but very few people these days really get it and will assume it has to turn into a relationship so it's not something I feel able to engage in. the culture that it was formed in was one where the material conditions were much different and people really did have the freedom to just engage in all kinds of freewheeling romances with people while living a nomadic lifestyle out of hippie vans and hitchhiking across the country, but nowadays everyone is immiserated and constantly living on a razor's edge of destitution. in order to bring back any actually existing free love ideals there would need to be a revolutionary change in the material conditions

@lanodan I'd just like to interject for a moment. what you're referring to as "love" is actually Free/Love, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Libre+Love. love is not an emotion unto itself but rather another free component of a fully functioning socius made useful for our species-being by labor and the relations of production as defined by Marx. many subjects under modernity experience a modified form of love every day without realizing it. through a peculiar turn of events, the version of sex and romance which is widely experienced today in the confines of domestic life, the couple-form, and reproduction is often called "love", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically an alienated form of love that develops out of the interconnectedness of all life on earth. there really is a love, and these people are using a version of it, but the emotions they experience are just a degenerated version of it.

love is the law: love under will. love is an essential part of life, but it is useless by itself; it can only function in the context of the realization of one's true will. love is normally used in combination with will: the whole system is basically will with love added. all the so-called "sexualities" are really distributions of an indiscriminate will to power that seeks to maximize its power to be affected by other bodies and to affect those bodies in turn.

@nyx Reminds me of how I've sometimes wanted to refer to economically co-dependent relationships as paid love.