Conversation
My childhood nickelodeon crush is an antisemite 🥰
4
2
6
>My childhood nickelodeon crush
3
0
0
@Oughtism I dont think being a christian supremacist is necessarily antisemitic. its just being a christian supremacist which kinda makes you anti everyone whos not christian in general.
2
0
0
To be a Christian is to be antisemitic, because jews are the enemy of Christ.
3
1
4
@Oughtism God has no enmity that compares to human enmity. He hates evildoers but loves them infinitely more. even if Jews are enemies of Jesus which is dubious (he was Hebrew and came first for the lost sheep of Israel and all his early supporters were Jews), Jesus said to love your enemy, which means not being antisemitic or hateful towards anyone. amazing how christians so casually disobey Jesus their Lord.
7
0
5
@Oughtism @georgia u can be christian without being antisemitic u kno lol
1
0
0
Jesus whipped their ass out of the Temple and called them the synagogue of Satan. Kill yourself.
1
1
4
@Oughtism @georgia sorry but i am christian and lov the jews ✝️🫱🫲✡️
1
0
1
A jew follows the talmud, not the Old testament or the New. To claim Jesus was a jew in this context is to outright lie and to rely on a jewish AI is something a kike would do.
1
1
8
@Oughtism he threw the money-changers out of the temple who were desecrating it not the jewish laity. also good luck getting into heaven telling people to kill themselves and using racial slurs.
2
0
0
Edited 15 days ago
@georgia @Oughtism don’t forget Jesus referred to non Jews multiple times as swine and dogs.
1
0
1
@georgia @Oughtism “Let love be without dissimulation. Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good.”
‭‭Romans‬ ‭12‬:‭9‬ ‭KJV‬‬
1
2
3
@technolyze @Oughtism I can only think of one time where the woman said "doesnt a dog eat the scraps that fall from their masters table" to that effect. there may be more examples though
1
0
0
@john_darksoul @Oughtism youre really using a paul quote to abrogate a jesus quote? you can hate evil while loving evildoers.
2
0
0
I have a far better chance at getting into heaven as a repentant sinner than you get for being a tranny faggot
1
0
1
You're a Pharisee and you're going to burn in hell for eternity
2
1
2
@georgia @Oughtism If jews renounced their evil ways and turned into servants of Christ (servants), so many of them becoming imprisoned, executed, and the rest giving up their riches to live as servile to the peoples they harmed they could atone. As of now they serve evil and are to be destroyed as enemies of God.
1
0
4
@Oughtism you dont sound like a repentant sinner you sound like an antinomian. at a certain point its time to at least attempt to sin less and youre not even trying.
1
0
0
@Oughtism @john_darksoul no one suffers forever because God is infinitely merciful but whatever
0
0
0
Edited 15 days ago
@georgia @Oughtism it’s possible context of the original piece
“ Do not give dogs what is holy; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet and then turn and tear you to pieces.”
I suppose it would require a textual and cultural analysis to say he’s referring to gentiles here for sure
0
0
0
How are you defining antisemitism? Don't tons of Jews consider mere proselytizing to be antisemitic?
0
0
1
That's not bad at all for 50.
1
0
1
Average millennial woman niggapensivecowboy
1
1
1
I think she'd be Gen X.
0
0
1

Jesus Christ was/is a First Century Judean. At the time of His birth, the Israelites were comprised of both the sincere Faithful, and also that part of the tribes who would reject their Messiah - mostly the ruling class (Pharisees and Sadducees, especially). This is entirely comparable to other Tribes and Nations of the time - some nonzero part of whom would respond favorably to the Gospel, and become His followers & disciples from amongst the broader populace.

1
1
5
Christian love of enemy means if they are bleeding to death in front of you you have to help them, like the Good Samaritan. It doesn’t mean you have to sit there and let them destroy you.
2
1
3
@captainslow @georgia @Oughtism Don't like that idea at all, fuck 'em let 'em bleed better to let em perish and never bother me and mine again.
1
0
1
many armies throughout history would tend to the wounded of both sides after a battle.
4
0
3
Absolutely but after the battle was won. Many Christians also need reminding that tolerance is NOT a Christian virtue.
0
0
3
I will assist those who are worthy of mercy.
1
0
5
@captainslow @georgia @Oughtism This simply isn't that kind of fight, my foes hate us and wish us destroyed wholly, it's only right that way.
0
1
4
Well yeah. The elders of Zion still get the rope.
1
0
3
All indians too, their very existence pollutes God’s temples
1
0
2
Only if they leave India. And we should give them a return window. And cut the telecom cables.
2
0
2
I can tolerate letting niggers live in their nations, not indians who pollute the land sea and sky with their rot.
3
0
2
They basically never stop being a threat.
0
0
1
Indians exploit mercy as much as kikes and it is why they must be struck down. Blacks are far more likely to actually humble themselves while pajeets WILL bury that knife in your back.
1
0
2
God is not their enemy, they're enemies of God. That's well understood. Charity (Christian love) towards jews means stopping them from committing even more evil and praying that they repent and convert before they have their personal meeting with Christ at the moment of their deaths.
0
0
1
@HatkeshiatorTND @Oughtism there are people in this thread arguing for indian genocide yet youd rather mince christian love in the comments
0
0
0
You are confused. Rabbinic Judaism is a direct descendant of Pharisees. He did not hesitate to call them hypocrites. When we also call out these hypocrites we are called anti-semites by them.
0
0
2
Testosterone is what makes you understand and respect violence, something niggers can at the very least do. Jeets are low on testosterone and so are kikes but indians are low on IQ AND low on testosterone, that's the worst combination second only to jew low T + no empathy + decent midwit ish IQ.

Fags are also low on testosterone. Ditto with foid normies, naturally.

Correlation is my causation. ayaya_woke
0
0
2
@Oughtism Imagine letting your 6 year old kid hang out with jews
What the fuck
0
0
0
@georgia @Oughtism This rethoric is precisely why hatred grows. It's the whole "your religion commands you to give me all these benefits! what, me? no I do not practice nor believe in your faith, and am not beholden to your rules, but you should still do as I say" situation.

Jesus said to love your enemy, not to let your enemy operate unimpeded among you. It was also said at a time when enemies were people who were fighting you a few battles a year in previously chosen battlegrounds over who was the king of the land and you paid taxes to, with little difference in day to day life otherwise. Not at a time of systemic poisoning of leviathan governments and institutions, not at a time of racial erasure.

Jews have never accepted any of the nice and loving solutions to incompatibility of goals, culture and religion. With the exception of ultra-orthodox walled communities, even when given a whole country to do as they please in, they refuse to simply leave Christians be and do as they please in their own nations. There would be no hatred at all if we all self-segregated and engaged in trade with other nations.

There's also a refusal to acknowledge "I want to live with my own people" as a valid opinion, as anything short of "die for israel while praising it" is branded "antisemitism", so equating """antisemitism""" with actual hatred is ridiculous. But it might as well be a "thief judges everyone by their own condition" thing as far as I know, perhaps they genuinely believe that, it doesn't matter in practice, you don't psychoanalize the fox in your henhouse while it eats your family's livelihood.

Even if you love someone, there can come a point when you need to use violence against them in preservation of everyone else you love. It's like having an addict or rapist family member. It doesn't matter if you love or hate them, they're an unfixable threat to everyone else in your family and you gotta shoot them dead, tears or no tears. If you love them, it might be an even more pressing need to do so, because it's both stopping the harm to others and the harm to themselves. And this is a position the threat puts itself in, it's not a position the victims put themselves in.
1
0
0
@john_darksoul @Oughtism Pointing this out is antisemitic, bad goy
No don't look at the convert saints goy! renouncing satan is not an option! it's another shoah oi vey!
0
0
0
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @georgia @Oughtism @david @voltrina Very good post. Modern talmudic jews will always try to fool people with this lie because their legitimacy and thus the massive money and manpower support they get from evangelical "christians" hinge completely on it.
2
0
2
@captainslow @georgia @William_The_Dragonborn @Oughtism @Witch_Hunter_Siegfried I agree with just letting them do their thing in India, but with a strict warning of "no more throwing shit (literal and figurative) into the rivers and seas, no more exterminating the animals and plants" and pre-industrial level of technology.

As long as you can smell India several days before touching port when traveling by boat, nuclear cleansing should be on the table.
0
0
0
@nerthos @Oughtism I believe in jesus much more than the average racist does. "everyone keep to themselves, kill your enemies" was not said by jesus. helping the weak and loving your enemies was preached by him. jews were gheottized like the haredi you claim not to be bothered by for literally thousands of years and they were still massacred and forcibly converted. you act like history between jews and christians isnt one of the jew being oppressed and is one of jewish usurpation which was only even possible after the napoleonic emancipation.
1
0
1
@georgia @Oughtism
>"everyone keep to themselves, kill your enemies" was not said by jesus.

"Invite your enemies into your homes and coexist with them" wasn't said by him either. And I already explained how "love your enemy" does not mean "let them act unimpeded"

>you act like history between jews and christians isnt one of the jew being oppressed and is one of jewish usurpation which was only even possible after the napoleonic emancipation.

Jews got literal papal bulls given to their protection. I haven't seen any head rabbi go "you are excommunicated if you hurt a gentile"
There was no big scale (though there was funding and support of the British and Dutch to carry out piracy, propaganda, massacres and colonization of Catholics and other gentiles since the protestant split) jewish oppression of Christians in between Hadrian and Napoleon simply because the ancestors of the jews tried to genocide Rome at its peak, and unlike the USA that's happy to have its teenagers killed by Israel and jail anyone who calls it out, Rome responded reasonably with increased violence at the successive attacks and revolts until Iudea was destroyed by Rome's self defense. (Simon bar Kokhba has to be the most retarded proto-jew in history honestly, to think that militarizing the entire population against the most powerful empire of an age would result in anything other than their destruction. And for some reason modern jews, instead of saying "yeah this was a big mistake our ancestors made and we gotta own it" instead go "rome bad, we victims!1!")
As soon as they had any meaningful military power again, jews started trying to ethnically cleanse everyone around their fiefs.

Christians were sometimes overzealous in the middle ages when jews were not a real threat, and that's why there were papal bulls about it, it was something recognized as bad by the church of Rome. Big steps were taken to correct overzealous violence. I don't claim that Christian kingdoms were always perfect in their behaviour, I claim that in modern times, it is necessary for Christians to defend and separate themselves from non-Christians. I don't want "payment" for what the wars of the Roman era or the middle ages caused, of which every participant is long dead, like some that still complain about the Pharaohs. I want the safety, physical and cultural, of my people.
1
0
1
@nerthos @Oughtism jesus said that people regardless of ancestry (whether jew or samaritan) should provide accomodation for their wounded neighbors at their local inn after binding their wounds and lending them their animal to ride on. thats pretty close to "invite people you dont like into your home out of christian love". and what's the point of the papal protections on jews when they were only in response to and barely mitigated persecutory excesses, which were the official state policy of many countries like Spain? furthermore you state that jewish rabbis have never ruled on protecting christians but welcoming the stranger who sojourns among you is in the torah so I find that incredibly dubious. just because youve only heard of the egregious halakhic rulings doesnt mean the good ones dont exist.
4
0
0
@nerthos @Oughtism as far as the safety of your people goes I hope you find it but if it involves the genocide of another people I can't support it as you know
2
0
0
@georgia @Oughtism Christians do not turn down wounded patients at their clinics for being jewish or whatever other faith (though jews sometimes refuse to let Christian doctors look after their sick and wounded, I have a family member working at a hospital near a jewish village and she has grown to dislike them for this over the years) nor leave people abandoned on the streets.

But taking care of a wounded person and sending them back to their home once they are in good enough shape for the trek is VASTLY different from allowing an enemy to have influence in core aspects of your country, like finance, politics or media. You keep constantly mixing both, as well as personal charity with civilization-scale emnity.

The papal protections were a direct response to excesses during the crusades, and it's the highest level that anyone got in the era. You can argue you don't like how life was in the middle ages, but you can't argue that "If you try to kill or forcefully convert these people you're excommunicated" wasn't the highest level of protection Christianity could offer.

The policy of Spain wasn't "persecutory excess", it was "this is a Christian kingdom, and any who wish to convert to our faith may stay and live as one of us, while any that do not wish to commit to Christ has a grace period to get their things and go in peace" after /800 fucking years of religious war for survival/, anyone else would have simply exterminated every leftover non-christian at that point, but Spain didn't because they were extremely Catholic and wouldn't go against Christ's teachings.
Enough infidels abused the good will of this and became fake converts that Spain had to create an inquisition to investigate it (which was so good at its job that people would, when accused of a heresy, demand they be investigated by the inquisition and not by laymen courts), but of course the caught fake converts would conspire with the enemies of Spain to lie about it and demonize them.
1
0
1
@georgia @Oughtism There is no need to genocide anyone if they just leave and agree genuinely not to fuck with us, but they seem determined to fight tooth and nail for every inch of influence in our nations. If the choice an enemy presents is "kill us or we kill you, no other options" I will gladly do the killing.
1
0
2
@nerthos @Oughtism jews had lived in Spain for many many generations at the time. I'd understand not allowing muslims who conquered them to live in Spain but not jews. youre right that the inquisition is blown hugely out of proportion in protestant historiography, but I'd say that burning someone alive is never warranted.
2
0
1
@nerthos @Oughtism jewish elites being just as divorced from the jewish laymen as gentile elites are from the christian laybeliever is something few in this thread would care to admit. the average person in both groups wants to perpetuate their ideology and themselves and doesnt want violence. this distinction may not persist though
1
0
1
@georgia @Oughtism Pagans had also lived for many generations but they converted or left or died fighting. Jews didn't get a particularly worse treatment than anyone else did, and were not native to Iberia. Unlike muslims, the armies of the King and Queen didn't chase them out of the land, they were given the choice to leave peacefully. They were also pretty unhappy with the idea of living in a Christian theocracy and would have complained eternally that society was dogmatically catholic, so leaving was genuinely the best option. It's the thing with being a minority that refuses to assimilate into the culture and faith of the land they live in, sooner or later there's an unsolvable friction that requires either one group leaves or a war. This is why generally minority ethnic groups simply assimilate and become part of the core population.
1
0
0
@nerthos @Oughtism most jews probably chose to stay which is why there were so many conversos. some were not genuine but some great saints were quite genuine.
1
0
1
@georgia @Oughtism That may be true, but it's not something that matters much in a state of war, in the same way that to the average jew there's little distinction between a wehrmacht infantryman and an ss officer. Jewish laymen however do not seem particularly bothered by shit like AIPAC or the ADL, overrepresentation in media, the whole "antisemitism" circus and so on. And new elites pop up if the existing ones are removed. So it still comes down to "each their own way or we gotta fight"
1
0
1
@georgia @Oughtism And I have absolutely no issues with the genuine converts. Neither did Spain or the church of Rome. That's one of the core differences: Christianity accepts those who want to convert genuinely, with no bloodline distinctions.
0
0
0
@nerthos @Oughtism youre comparing the average jew to a wermacht infantryman when the proper comparison is to a german civilian. I'm totally opposed to AIPACs influence and the influence of the israel lobby.
1
0
0
@georgia @Oughtism The average infantryman didn't give a shit about the politics though, he was fighting against the very real threat of communism, but sure, let's go with civilians, which were targeted by several extermination plans that thankfully were stopped.
You're a hinduist convert though. A minority within minorities.
1
0
0
@nerthos @Oughtism the next generation of american jews will be either entirely reform or reconstructionist or atheist apart from a few enclaves, at least half will intermarry. whitenats talk about survival of their people but dont realize that the jewish people will not survive outside of Israel and a few ghettoes in other countries. ironically the only thing that could stop the process of assimilation is a persecution.
2
0
0

A slew of accounts I’ve seen in recent years have really hammered on the “Dead-Kike-on-a-Stick” narrative; really losing sight of the fact that most White Europeans‘ ancestry is comprised of people whose own ancestors not only converted willingly to Christianity - but also thought of themselves as Literally Israel in absolute keeping with Traditional Ecclesiology.

In other words, if you’re a White person of European stock, most of your Medieval and Ancient ancestors for over a thousand years almost certainly saw zero ontological difference between themselves, and “Israel” from the Old Testament — as this is part-and-parcel of the Traditional Christian worldview. Even up to as recently as the 1860s, it never even occurred to most Protestants to think any differently.

Contemporary jewish claims of identity with Ancient Israelites were never even heard of amongst White People, until after that whole mid-19th Century “Plymouth Bretheren” thing with John Nelson Darby. A good piece of evidence for this is that Mormons even thought of themselves as literally Israel, all the way up through to Utah Statehood and beyond. This was the normal, default view of the vast majority of the White people of the world for a very, very long time.

1
0
3
my only gripe is the jew that rejected Christ is still depicted as a chad.
0
0
1
@georgia @Oughtism While this might be the case, the survival of their ethnic group is of little importance to white nationalists. We only care about them no longer being a factor within our nations, a stop of infinity browns and race mixing, and preventing our own people from being prey to epstein types by yesterday, not in a few generations. "Kill every jew" is a burden by necessity not a sport, we would all rather be grillin' at home than kicking sand trying to find tunnels under tel aviv in 42ºC sandstorms to throw grenades into. This is why I say we're forced to it because they just won't leave.
1
0
3
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @georgia @Oughtism @david @voltrina Oh I agree with this. The traditional Christian self-perception is that they are the heirs of the blessing of Abraham through the spiritual and sometimes blood inheritance of the evangelizers that came during the time of Rome.
1
0
0
@nerthos @Oughtism you can't seriously present yourself as a person of sober reason let alone a christian if your position is the same as hitlers. if youre merely being rhetorical I apologize, otherwise this thread isnt worth my time.
2
0
0
@georgia @Oughtism My position is "path of least resistance to the safety, survival and sovereignty of my people", and that's a decision that the enemy makes. It can be as simple as "we do this treaty of mutual non-interventionism and stick to our own sides of the fence" or as annyoing and costly as Rome's defeat of Carthage. Obviously the simplest, cheapest, least involved solution is always the ideal one but one can only define the stance and conditions of their own side, not the opponent's.

For example, I'm not opposed to immigration, I'm only opposed to immigration that doesn't share a blood or cultural or religious bond with my people. If an Italian, Spainard, German, Irishman, Pole or Frenchman wants to come and live in the house next to mine that's perfectly good and they're welcome. If an Igbo that doesn't even speak a word of my language and can't tell Christ from Mary wants to come live next to me, I'll tell him "no, this is not your place"
1
0
1
@nerthos @Oughtism what about an Ethiopian christian, or a Copt, or a lebanese Maronite?
2
0
0
@georgia @Oughtism They're fine, I like the Ethiopians in particular.
1
0
0

To the present day, this is affirmed constantly in the Services, Hymnography, and Homiletics of the Orthodox Church - and we didn’t just make it up. It’s reiterated over and over again in the tattered dog-eared books and beat up old cardboard boxes from which the Reader and Choir Director put together the Service according to the Typikon for any given day. We inherited it from the last ones, just like everyone in the same position prior has done since time immemorial. lex orandi, lex credendi.

1
0
1
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @Oughtism @nerthos @david @voltrina I understand why christians think theyre tru israel but I think by caring about who is and isnt an Israelite you miss the universality of christ
3
2
2

Traditional Ecclesiology is what it is and has ever been; Christ is God Almighty and Undisputed Ruler over all Creation. Not sure what’d be missing, in there.

1
0
1

Seems pretty darn comprehensive to me 😆

0
0
0
The universality of Christ is why Christians are Israel.
0
0
1
@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz @KingOfWhiteAmerica@poa.st @Oughtism@shin.mugicha.club @nerthos@shitposter.world @david@voidposter.club @voltrina@voidposter.club

more to the point, i think that "we da real jooz" narrative is super cringe when do it and even more cringe when literate white men do it, who ought to know better
3
0
2
@kuteboicoder @voltrina @david @nerthos @KingOfWhiteAmerica @Oughtism @georgia Ha those guys are awesome. They hang out by the subway and scream "WHITE DEVILS" at the tourists.
0
0
0
@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz @KingOfWhiteAmerica@poa.st @Oughtism@shin.mugicha.club @nerthos@shitposter.world @david@voidposter.club @voltrina@voidposter.club

come to think of it, "we da real jooz" is super cringe coming from the 1st century church itself. Christ was an anarchic jew, as wrote.

When the apostle Stephen denounced the Pharisees as a "stiff necked people", that is precisely the sort of thing that a stiff necked jew would say.

it's jewish neurosis all the way down.
2
0
0
@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz @KingOfWhiteAmerica@poa.st @Oughtism@shin.mugicha.club @nerthos@shitposter.world @david@voidposter.club @voltrina@voidposter.club

so why has that memetic capture been so effective?

obviously, the evangelical narrative itself has a certain hero's-journey first person adventure arc; the born-again alcoholic trope. "jesus saved my soul" and all that.

it's not just a satisfying fairy tale however. ancient jewry, to their credit, attempted to record their history as far back as possible; and then they reached back even further to the dawn of time.

the stories in genesis, of ancestors with lifespans of literally centuries, they're trying as hard as they can to backfill in the gaps in the record, to the time at which the world supposedly began.

there's no other ancient historiography in the Western world that goes back that far, in that much biographical detail for its key characters. we know about King David's love life, but we know nothing about the baby momma drama of the Teutonic or Britannic warlords of that same time period.
2
0
0

As I doubt you’re under your parents legal guardianship, anymore, Church membership is entirely at your own discretion. As we’re now in the US yoked under a pluralistic State, you’re not even under broad societal compulsion to participate. It’s Traditionally believed to have eternal consequences about which I’m sure you’re informed - but I’m equally sure no Inquisition is hounding you about it in any event 😆

0
0
2
@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz @KingOfWhiteAmerica@poa.st @Oughtism@shin.mugicha.club @nerthos@shitposter.world @david@voidposter.club @voltrina@voidposter.club

thus, anybody in the West who was genuinely curious about the origins of human civilization itself would have no choice but to consult with jewish records. it's why the Hebrew prophets were retconned as Islamic prophets, during Mohammad's time, and why pre-Islamic Arabian civilization is known as the "period of ignorance".

that's all fine and good as matter of intellectual curiosity. but those historical records have some pretty heavy-handed bias about israel's ancient enemies that a reasonable goy should take heed of.
2
0
0

It’s interesting seeing how those Outside the Faith wrestle with the reality of the situation.

0
0
1

Of very great interest to me, personally, are those Universal pre-historic events about which cultures from around the world have shared mythological commonality. The Fall of Man; the Great Flood; the Tower of Babel; Nations warring against Giants in order to secure ancestral homelands; the undisputed existence of the Underworld - about whom virtually everybody the world over has the same basic things to say; the characters of the various Pantheons etc etc. This long suggested to me an older global proto-Culture, as the coincidences are far too numerous to have arisen stochastically.

2
0
4
@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz @KingOfWhiteAmerica@poa.st @Oughtism@shin.mugicha.club @nerthos@shitposter.world @david@voidposter.club @voltrina@voidposter.club

... and notice I repeatedly hedge by noted that the jewish scriptures that had been compiled by the Second Temple period were arguably superior to anything that Western civilization had written by that time

Persian, Chinese, and Indus civilizations had written histories and mythologies about the origins of their civilizations which were arguably just as ancient, just as detailed and just as accurate about their own histories. Also Hindu civilization had already perfected base-10 arithmetic by that time

it wasn't until the 19th century that the natural, zoological emergence of humankind came into vogue in British academia
0
0
1
@georgia@netzsphaere.xyz @KingOfWhiteAmerica@poa.st @Oughtism@shin.mugicha.club @nerthos@shitposter.world @david@voidposter.club @voltrina@voidposter.club

overfitting

all civilizations have a first recorded flood because all primitive agrarian settlements were placed in low-lying deltas near freshwater sources

Yu the Great - the first king of proto-Chinese civilization - was famous for "taming the flood waters" - obviously those flood waters were local floods in Western China

There was never a worldwide flood that covered the mountaintops - absurd on its face - and there was never a single flood-surviving family that became the sole ancestors of mankind
1
0
0

My man, I think the Earth is Concave. The fact of a singular Global Flood just isn’t especially weird

1
0
0

Basically an exact geometric inverse of the current prevailing cosmogony - which is why “global” doesn’t bother me a bit

1
0
0

It’s obviously a lot more intentional than Spaceballs suggests; which is one of its best features imo

0
0
0
who were the children of the nephilim?
1
0
0

Well they’re called ”Elioud” in Enoch

1
0
0
But Jews really are vermin parasites.
1
0
1

I think; it occurs to me they might just be referenced in other books referencing Enoch

1
0
0

In any event, Enoch deals with the antediluvian world; it’s only Scripture to Ethiopians

Nevertheless it was broadly considered a sincere attempt at history in Ancient times.

0
0
0

When enough Christians remember this, we win.

If only all the Christian-bashers would use their energy on spreading this fact. IDK if they are agnostic, atheist, pagan, whatever - the goal at-hand is defeating the jewish-mob rulers, who are the enemy of all White people.

0
0
0

I didn't know Blavatsky was JQ aware. Interesting.

0
0
0

More ironic that they use the Pharisee / Baal / Saturn-god 6-pointed star. They didn't even root their ideology in the original Hebrew faith.

0
0
0

The "Good Samaritan" is the original NAxALT story - teaching about dealing with individuals vs dealing with groups.
If only more people could simply understand the difference, rather than trying to conflate these two very different contexts.

0
0
0

When two White people fight, usually the White victor will stop when the opponent "stays down" - is no longer a threat. And, other Whites will stop him if he starts putting the boots to the loser.

Other racial groups - blacks come to mind - do not behave this way. Just another example of why "treat everyone as individuals" doesn't work in a "multi-cultural" situation. If we want to live with dignity and honor, we must live separately from members of groups who are incapable of doing so.

0
0
1

Blacks would too, if they could manage a plastic factory. Just tell the indians if they don't stop the plastic-pollution, we missile-strike their plastic factories. Then, they will stop.

The same with air-pollution which carries beyond their territory - though that would also include the Chinese; we inhale the mercury from their coal-plants all the way across the Pacific, in the USA.

0
0
2

Spain - which had been taken by the Moors with jewish collaboration? Golly, why would the Spanish "persecute" jews, after that? And, don't forget the jews' well-poisoning, child-sacrifices, usury-practices = why they were "persecuted."

But then, the Spanish FOOLISHLY allowed "conversion" as an option - not thinking that the so-called "jews" were Babylonian-Occult / Baal worshiping fake "conversos" to Hebrewism - so their "conversions" would not be sincere?

The so-called "jews" are no more practicing the original Hebrew faith, than Hatian Santerians are practicing Catholicism, as they mask their African gods behind the faces of Saints, for cover.

The Turks made the same mistake - allowing "conversion" to Islam by the "jews" in their lands. Even centuries later, that cancer became the "Young Turks" who genocided Armenians, and created the "secular" Turkish govt. Erdogan pretended to roll this back a bit, but I see no evidence of sincerity, as he continues shipping oil to israhell.

0
0
2

the next generation of american jews will be either entirely reform or reconstructionist or atheist

Oh, the ones who spread LGBTPedo-disease, and mass-3rd-world immigration, anti-White historical narratives, and a generally nihilist POV?

No thanks on that option. It is far more genocidal to our people than the zio-jew wars. Persecution it is, then.

0
0
1
Your neighbors are your race, it wouldn't make sense to invite savages from the third world to murder your family.
0
0
3

I wish them well in their homelands. They don't belong in ours, and we don't belong in theirs.

Why? Because, their DNA codes for different brains and hormone-levels - hence behavior - than European DNA. Both groups are better-off with systems of govt which accommodate their different natures.

0
0
2
Hitler was trying to save people from the machinations of the Jews. The Jews are monsters. They are of their father, Satan.
0
0
4

Yes. One of the "features" of their history was a breeding-program to select for the most evil, disgusting attributes known to man. The side-effects of inbreeding became a part of it.

This is why I fervently oppose an "assimilationist" position with jews, in particular. We DO NOT WANT their genes "mixed" with ours, or in our homelands at all.

0
0
0
@PopulistRight @georgia @Oughtism The heirs of Pelagius will never forget what was done, thank you for sharing this.
0
0
1