Conversation

Lucy [hiatus era] 𒌋𒁯

waow there's a better llm and it's available to the public (not just as a service, but the actual model?).
the world is healing, a little bit in a strange way.
4
5
9
@lucy and you still need like 400 tb of vram to use it
1
0
0
@lucy Tbh I don't know enough to assess the malware probability here
1
0
1
@druid there's billions of devices and software you should be more concerned about tbqh
1
0
1
@lucy Lol I suppose that is true. Being on fedi has given me paranoia by osmosis.
0
0
0
@kirby not even close lol
1
0
1

Lucy [hiatus era] 𒌋𒁯

@snacks @kirby dare i say... the researches were POVERTYBRAINED mindblown cc @meso
1
3
3
@lucy yea i know i just like exaggerating because it's funny
0
0
0

Cinerion Amator Meridiationis

Edited 10 months ago
@lucy @kirby @snacks @meso Proof researchers should be given less, not more, and even be caged during their research with freedom as their prize thinkbird
1
1
3
@meso @lucy China ran while the rest of us walked. blobfoxgooglytrash
0
0
0
@cine @kirby @snacks @meso i miss the lab of my old employer it's such a vibe and amazing work environment
0
0
2
@snacks @kirby @lucy WOAH, ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT, NOT THROWING RESOURCES AT THE PROBLEM?
0
0
1
@lucy it’s not actually better imo
2
0
0
@mischievoustomato @lucy your mileage may vary but for actual productive uses I don’t find it better at all. Feels like it’s a rip off of o1 let alone o3. It’s cool it’s open source and we’ve added it to the archives but practically it remains limited imo
1
0
1
@arcana @lucy odd that people call it much better than chatgpt
1
0
1
@mischievoustomato @lucy a lot of that is coming from people who don’t pay a subscription and so haven’t played with the reasoning models, or who haven’t actually played around with either extensively
1
0
1
@arcana @lucy hmm, got it. Now, if the FOSS community could get to improve this, it'd be great, not really holding my breath though.
0
0
1