most confusing syntactic construct to ever exist and you NEST THEM ???? REALLY ???

@coolbean ternary

@chjara trust me i know i wouldnt

@coolbean yea but its always so jarring to see amd it never flows cleanly to me idk

@coolbean im so glad rust doesnt have ternaries . good choice ngl

@fiore Yeah i would

@kimapr bad kimapr

@coolbean yep no ternaries .

@coolbean idk i can appreciate a bold choice like this . also all blocks evaluate to smth so that make things much nicer than other similar languages like c sometimes .

@chjara @coolbean no its better

@chjara @coolbean @fiore Yeah they’re even funnier i’d say

@chjara @coolbean @fiore including LISP?

@coolbean @chjara @fiore no but i’ve seen GNU Guile

and GNU Guix with its “gex pressions”

@chjara @coolbean @fiore it has coroutines/fibers and OOP and multithreading and and

@chjara @coolbean @fiore YES you can have data races in GNU Guile

@chjara @coolbean @fiore heh, almost if foo; then bar; else baz; fi

@chjara @coolbean @fiore to be fair guile’s thing probably predates that. kind of like the commonjs vs es6 modules thing

@kimapr @chjara @coolbean gnu moment

@chjara @coolbean @kimapr js is my favorite scheme

@fiore @chjara @coolbean TRUE

@fiore @coolbean it’s either that or if (shit) shart() else piss();

@kirby @coolbean way better

@coolbean @chjara @kimapr true