Posts
70248
Following
404
Followers
2029
weclome to my website!!
$PAGE_VIEWS
blobcatnompeachblobcatautismblobcatgrimacing

georiga on telegram
georgia@trashserver.net on xmpp
(response times may vary)

debianxfcelineageos2fdroidraspberrypi

तत् त्वम् असि

I post silly cats sometimes
@meeper you apologize for the pajeet stereotype way too much smh. india will have its day as a great civilization again, no need for apologies.
1
0
1
actually kinda bothers me when lefties who dont give a fuck about God try to say jesus was a left-wing anarchist. jesus was dharmic and that means he hated mammon but he also hated violence which means he wouldnt be left or right wing (because the left supports abortion and "assisted suicide" and the right supports gun violence and selfish imperialist wars). jesus hung out with sex workers yeah, that doesnt mean he supported prostitution. he told the woman caught in adultery to sin no more.
and the right-wing xenophobes who say jesus would have been an american patriot are just as delusional...
0
0
3
@meeper I need to learn classical sanskrit so bad bro
0
0
1
@meeper in hinduism its nirguna and saguna
2
0
0
repeated
unbothered. moisturized. happy. in my lane. focused. flourishing.
1
7
8
grrrrrr.... cloudflare make me mad!!! georgia smash!!!
0
0
11
@nerthos @anemone @lizzie and God being exempt from dharma isnt a paradox. all unattached free beings are exempt from dharma.
1
0
0
@nerthos @lizzie @anemone I'm not a pantheist I'm a panentheist. God doesnt have humanlike thoughts. the mind is just a faculty like the senses, when you go beyond mind, intellect, and ego, there is Brahman.
1
0
1
peeposmoke yea baby
1
2
0
@nerthos @lizzie @anemone I see them both as being true and important. when Brahman is called "sat" that means that God is eternal truth, existence, and goodness. of course nothing truly exists but the good! yet, Brahman is also called "asat", but this means that Brahman is both being and non-being, and collapses/transcends the dual of both
1
0
1
nighttime potato time?
0
0
1
@lizzie @anemone @nerthos I very much agree that dharma is divine, little p perfect, but perfect in the "perfect example of what it is" way that a saint can be perfected, not Perfect like God who is the absolute truth, all encompassing and infinite beyond all fathoming is. its a basic hindu tenet at least as far as I know that while God upholds dharma He/She is totally above it. So God may lie for instance in a place where a human can't (like to an evil person for the purpose of delivering the fruit of that persons karma, or to a good person with a greater plan in mind), not just because sin can't touch God who is unattached and harbors no malice, but because God is genuinely Good beyond the pre/proscriptions of dharma. for instance its pretty obvious that while God can kill a child with an infectious disease based on that child's karma, a human who is not Perfect and unattached like God cannot infect a child with a disease like God can while incurring no sin. its more than it being Gods station to kill as He/She sees fit, God is genuinely transcendently Good beyond common notions of good and evil. God is also nirguna (without the human notions of attributes) but thats another can of worms. its so hard to describe that thing from which all words turn back...
1
0
2
@Lux even if I'm pure evil inside I dont act evil in my discoursing with others. you, on the contrary, are quick to judge and quicker to anger.
0
0
0
@nerthos @anemone this is true for the Supreme Lord who is above dharma and adharma and all human laws and proscriptions, but the devas follow dharma like the dharma humans are meant to follow or they wouldnt be devas. manifestations of the divine, devas or amsas/kalas, that appear fearsome or disgusting are actually quite beautiful and benign to the eye and heart of a yogi.
2
0
2
@nerthos @anemone sometimes agree with the latter but not the former. if the lofty station of deva (or even lower celestials like gandharvas) were not higher than a human in almost every way, these beings would not be given such power and would not be worthy of sacrifices and other worship.
1
0
0
Show older