@technolyze like what

could be christian influence but im not a fan of the hindu description of God as being posessed of opulence. majesty and auspiciousness yes, but not opulence. the Lord possesses the worlds wealth but i would never say it defines Him as an attribute (if youre into saguna brahman).

@technolyze not much I read sometimes though. theres one show I wanna watch cause I caught my mom watching it and it seems good

better to incessantly talk about God than about the media I consume I would say

water is really an impressive substance

@patchuun states are silly things period tbh. they take themselves way too seriously. states are the gender of nations

@patchuun I get why you'd say that but jews are an ancient diaspora people oppressed and historically ghettoized and subject to disabilities for being such, for belonging to different and foreign ethnic (and often cultural) mores, especially racial antisemitism and the drefyfus affair motivated immigration to israel. these were not merely people of a different ideological strain or economic opportunists. and even loyal assimilated jews were treated like the "palestinians among us" (as kant said) hence dreyfus. you honestly really can diminish the experiences of stateless peoples (which include the Palestinians more or less, and obviously Kurds and Tibetans and such) by saying the british, dutch, french, people who moved to america were of that likeness. the british, dutch, french, people who immigrated all spoke the same tongue and worshipped the same or a very similar God as the nations they came from. I'm curious though, what's your take on the american revolutionaries? I always found it queer how we celebrate people who literally tarred and feathered (a fucked up torture method).

I think that saying things like linux master race disempowers actual racism instead of supporting

@sathariel oh shit

@patchuun almost no jews in israel have any roots in the UK and the UK flip flopped constantly on supporting zionism. the simple answer is that jews were a stateless people, not a true colony of any nation, though they were obviously settlers. also, both jews and palestinians are indigenous to palestine, but calling either the "indigenous people" is frankly individous of true indigenous peoples like the samaritans. as usual leftist rhetoric on Israel/palestine is oversimplified and falsely casts the jewish nation and all middle eastern nations in western terms

youll never catch me saying Supreme Personality of Godhead

@georgia
why are amerikkkan leftists so hung up on this issue?
The imperial war machine blows apart the middle east or south america every two months but performing the anti-war populist only finds any mass base when directed at the jewish nation.
Is it the issues with budget or the lobbyism, jewish antizionists, academic anti-colonial ideology that make this such a popcultural phenomenon?
Especially with radlibs they are 10000x more likely to get drafted to defend ukraine than israel at any given moment yet they will emphasize how they "won't die for Israel" while they shill the Zelensky regime 24/7. I don't even know if the IDF would take US soldiers as qualified combatants

@patchuun agree on most accounts but what country is israel a colony of

I can't seem to get the hamilplex (pedoplex) out of my follow requests because we defedded their instance

people suprise you. I recently argued with a desi who casually talks about the importance of the jewish question and also recently several muslims have followed me despite my being hindu

just the dush, man

I have eaten so much pork lately especially of the chinese and italian variety. my ancestors do not smile on me.

basically I would argue that the Knower-Knowledge-Known is All-Knowing, because it is All-Knowledge

sometimes the left is quite silly with regard to israel although I agree with them in many cases. "no hebrew, dont go to the place where you have religious, ethnic, and cultural roots, you would displace the palestinians. instead, move to america, where we already displaced the native population". its paternalistic and misguided.

theres a lot I like about Advaita vedanta although I dont consider myself an advaita vedantin anymore, just a monist. one difference is I think its silly that they don't think Para Brahman knows Itself because its the only substance. I think its possible to say that Brahman is knower-knowledge-known and also all-knowing, I just think its a different definition of all-knowing thats not "knowing other different things", thats non-dual and thus even more all- encompassing.