Posts
74952
Following
405
Followers
2069
weclome to my website!!
$PAGE_VIEWS
blobcatnompeachblobcatautismblobcatgrimacing

georiga on telegram
georgia@trashserver.net on xmpp
(response times may vary)

fedoradebiankdenewxfcesailfishoslineageos2fdroidraspberrypi

अहं ब्रह्मास्मि त्वं ब्रह्म असि अयम् आत्मा ब्रह्म सर्वं खल्विदं ब्रह्म
@meso @dagda @yomiel and you cant say you love God while viewing every religion as inherently corrupt and while viewing me reading divine revelation as a waste of time and not "true learning"
0
0
1
@meso @dagda @yomiel God literally does tell me things i wouldnt lie about that because i know people are just going to think im schizophrenic. im being completely serious.
0
0
1
did dishes now back to reading
0
0
0
@meso @dagda @yomiel >doesnt understand it
>therefore it must be false
1
0
0
i <3 angiosperms
2
5
5
@meso @dagda @yomiel the notion that religion is primarily about control is a western reformation era belief. religion is about love of God when done correctly. you can be content to reject all religions while ill be content to have my own religious beliefs from things God has told me :)
1
0
0
@yomiel @dagda @meso what has convinced me is my religious experiences and undeniable miracles in my life
1
0
1
the essence of God is not even separable from maya, for maya is Gods greatest power and a direct result of Gods perfect freedom. maya makes the impossible possible, causing God to "forget Himself" if He wants to, creating the bound jivas and all that seems to be unlike God.
0
0
1
sat and chit are not "powers" of God but are descriptions of Gods perfect essence and existence. Being is inherently Conscious, Self-Knowledge is inherently Truth.
1
1
0
my nana said she wants to live :)
0
0
1
many hear illusion and think fake, but the early advaita vedantins were much more nuanced than this. in fact the view of sankara was likely that the world is real because its based on brahman, but that it is transient. this is very similar to my understanding of the world as real but dreamlike in its transience and lack of universality.
1
0
2
mithya originally meant neither essentially real nor essentially unreal, but transient like an illusion, not "totally unreal"
1
0
1
you cant make this shit up
0
1
0
lol aurobindo just touched on the ocean wave metaphor too thats so funny
1
1
0
(while actually being nothing but ocean)
0
0
1
reading about ramakrishnas visions of Kali Maa as a boundless ocean of luminous consciousness with waves, that corresponds to my understanding of God and the world as pure consciousness with the world being the movement of this consciousness so well. it synergizes the vedantic and the tantric... God is non-dual self-luminous self-awareness, but He vibrates to produce "waves", or spandas, that appear limited and manifold and discrete
1
0
3
God taught me that God transcends passive and dynamic, because both imply duality
0
0
1
alright ill stop boring you with the livetooting
0
0
1
aurobindo being a vedantic agrees with me that Para Brahman is unmoving being as it doesnt change and is beyond time. ive said and thought this! however, the tantrics are right that Brahman CAN move, this movement is the universe of becoming.
0
0
0
just read a translation of this verse which has the standing still part other translators omit but it translates apah as waters
0
0
0
Show older