*May I have your attention please*

This Red Squirrel built a fort DIRECTLY BELOW THE BIRD FEEDER.

#Squirrels

adult krishna of the bhagavata purana is frankly a huge disappointment for those looking for more of the God we found in the Bhagavad Gita. he simply doesnt reflect the true character of God. God is above dharma and adharma but He should also be the highest example to follow in his avataras, even if not always literally. but Krishna in this purana is quick to anger, easily appeased by praise, and munificent first and foremost to those who are born well (or are his devotees, which does make sense). krishna shows mercy onto some of those he kills by granting them liberation, but this is depicted more as a reflection of either the purity of his body which touches them or of the potency of absorption on God, even if it takes the form of enmity with God. this is an interesting message but I dont think it truly reflects Gods infinite mercy, also because the kinds of liberation they receive are typically "inferior" forms.

the story of paundraka is so silly. I don't like how Siva is portrayed in much of this purana...

Not A Fan of balaramas visit back home to vraj and him terrorizing the river while drunk either

the story of nriga sucks ass. he didnt deserve to be reborn as a lizard. he just made a mistake which was tiny compared to his good deeds but the writers of the purana want to instill fear of crossing the brahmanas so they had him punished so even though he tried to remedy the situation. its messed up.

the bhagavata purana kinda sucks after krishna leaves vraj to kill kamsa. its not worthy of keshava.

somehow I really doubt this

need one of these signs around my neck that says “thank you for not feeding me burger”

NOT a fan of krishna and balarama killing all those wrestlers even though they are servants of kamsa. just kill kamsa guys. stop killing humans stick to demons. smdh

I need a haircut

not a fan of krishna killing the arrogant clothes dyer. he should really stick to demons. but, I dont consider much of this text to be divine in origin. and this my friends illustrates why.

tfw amazon changes its time of delivery estimate to another timespan and then another and then gives up and says "still arriving today"

the murti wiki article really downplays the belief which is widespread in hindu bhakti in my understanding that the murti is a literal form of incarnation of the deity, hence its often just called "the deity". it seems to be a response to criticism of idol worship. instead the article seems to pretend that a catholic like belief exists in regard to images of the divine. maybe the sources I'm reading are too traditional though? in one part of the article it says that its understood that brahman has no form, but many believe that the brahman has both no form and infinite forms/manifestations. I wonder what the Hindi, Tamil, etc versions of the article have to say!

youre addicted to weed I'm addicted to seaweed. I ate 42 snack packs in 2 days.

I want seaweed so bad

its so funny how many cows are given to the brahmanas in sanskrit hindu literature as an act of thanksgiving. absolutely absurd numbers.

"we come from God and unto God we return". yet so many religions have qualms with the second part, or interpret it loosely...

slept for 17 hours today what the actual fuck

wizards of the coast sells for cheap some 4e and older materials up to the TSR on drivethrurpg which is a print on demand site. pretty cool